• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过课堂座位安排提高有外化问题儿童的社会融入度:一项随机对照试验

Enhancing Social Inclusion of Children With Externalizing Problems Through Classroom Seating Arrangements: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

van den Berg Y H M, Stoltz S

机构信息

Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Emot Behav Disord. 2018 Mar;26(1):31-41. doi: 10.1177/1063426617740561. Epub 2018 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1177/1063426617740561
PMID:29503518
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5815425/
Abstract

Inclusive education has brought new challenges for teachers, including the search for a suitable place in the classroom for children with externalizing problems. In the current study, we examined whether a careful rearrangement of the classroom seats could promote social acceptance and more prosocial behaviors for children with externalizing problems, and limit the potential negative consequences for classmates sitting next to them. The sample of this randomized controlled trial consisted of 64 classrooms with 221 fourth- to sixth-grade children selected by their teachers because of elevated levels of externalizing behavior. Results showed that over time children with externalizing behavior were better liked by their seatmates and showed fewer externalizing problems according to the teacher. This was particularly the case when students sat next to a well-liked and prosocial buddy, or when they were initially disliked. Classmates who sat next to a child with externalizing problems did not become more aggressive or less prosocial over time. Yet their social status did decrease slightly over time as a result of the rearrangement. We discuss implications and future directions for research on classroom seating arrangements to support children with externalizing problems.

摘要

全纳教育给教师带来了新的挑战,包括为有外化问题的儿童在教室里寻找合适的位置。在本研究中,我们考察了精心重新安排教室座位是否能促进有外化问题儿童的社会接纳度和更多亲社会行为,并限制坐在他们旁边的同学可能受到的负面影响。这项随机对照试验的样本包括64个班级的221名四至六年级学生,这些学生因外化行为水平较高而被他们的老师选中。结果表明,随着时间的推移,有外化行为的儿童更受同桌喜欢,并且根据老师的评价,他们的外化问题也更少。当学生坐在一个受欢迎且亲社会的伙伴旁边时,或者当他们最初不受欢迎时,情况尤其如此。坐在有外化问题儿童旁边的同学并没有随着时间的推移变得更具攻击性或亲社会性更低。然而,由于座位重新安排,他们的社会地位确实随着时间的推移略有下降。我们讨论了教室座位安排研究的意义和未来方向,以支持有外化问题的儿童。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1461/5815425/5242f69ff9c2/10.1177_1063426617740561-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1461/5815425/5242f69ff9c2/10.1177_1063426617740561-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1461/5815425/5242f69ff9c2/10.1177_1063426617740561-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Enhancing Social Inclusion of Children With Externalizing Problems Through Classroom Seating Arrangements: A Randomized Controlled Trial.通过课堂座位安排提高有外化问题儿童的社会融入度:一项随机对照试验
J Emot Behav Disord. 2018 Mar;26(1):31-41. doi: 10.1177/1063426617740561. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
2
Peer status and classroom seating arrangements: a social relations analysis.同伴地位与课堂座位安排:一项社会关系分析。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Feb;130:19-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
3
Classroom risks and resources: Teacher burnout, classroom quality and children's adjustment in high needs elementary schools.课堂风险与资源:高需求小学教师职业倦怠、课堂质量与儿童适应情况
J Sch Psychol. 2015 Oct;53(5):337-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
4
Effects of a seating chart intervention for target and nontarget students.座位图表干预对目标学生和非目标学生的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Mar;191:104742. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104742. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
5
Teacher practices as predictors of children's classroom social preference.教师实践是儿童课堂社会偏好的预测因素。
J Sch Psychol. 2012 Feb;50(1):95-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Aug 28.
6
Peer status and behaviors of maltreated children and their classmates in the early years of school.受虐儿童及其同学在入学初期的同伴地位和行为
Child Abuse Negl. 2007 Sep;31(9):971-91. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.04.004. Epub 2007 Sep 17.
7
Transactional associations among teacher support, peer social preference, and child externalizing behavior: a four-wave longitudinal study.师生支持、同伴社交偏好与儿童外化行为的关系:一项四波纵向研究。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2011;40(1):87-99. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2011.533409.
8
Does the Incredible Years Teacher Classroom Management Training programme have positive effects for young children exhibiting severe externalizing problems in school?: a quasi-experimental pre-post study.“难以置信的岁月教师课堂管理培训计划” 对在学校表现出严重外化问题的幼儿有积极影响吗?一项准实验前后研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Oct 26;16(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1077-1.
9
Classroom-level adversity: Associations with children's internalizing and externalizing behaviors across elementary school.课堂层面的逆境:与小学阶段儿童内化和外化行为的关联
Dev Psychol. 2017 Mar;53(3):497-510. doi: 10.1037/dev0000268. Epub 2017 Jan 2.
10
Classroom climate and the mental health of primary school children.课堂氛围与小学生的心理健康
Nord J Psychiatry. 2002;56(4):285-90. doi: 10.1080/08039480260242787.

引用本文的文献

1
Social Preference of Children at Risk for ADHD in Schools: Do They Have Limited Social Resources and can Friends Protect Against Peer Rejection?学校中患注意缺陷多动障碍风险儿童的社交偏好:他们的社交资源有限吗?朋友能防止他们被同伴拒绝吗?
J Atten Disord. 2025 Aug;29(10):896-907. doi: 10.1177/10870547251349244. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
2
Relationship Between Direct Aggression and Prosocial Behavior: The Role of Attention and Intelligence Among Children at Risk for Behavioral Problems.直接攻击行为与亲社会行为之间的关系:注意力和智力在有行为问题风险儿童中的作用
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Aug 16. doi: 10.1007/s10578-024-01738-7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Peer status and classroom seating arrangements: a social relations analysis.同伴地位与课堂座位安排:一项社会关系分析。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Feb;130:19-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
2
The effects of young children's affiliations with prosocial peers on subsequent emotionality in peer interactions.幼儿与亲社会同伴的关系对随后同伴互动中的情绪性的影响。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2012 Nov;30(Pt 4):569-85. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02073.x. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
3
Effectiveness of an individual school-based intervention for children with aggressive behaviour: a randomized controlled trial.
Do Adolescents Adopt the Prosocial Behaviors of the Classmates They Like? A Social Network Analysis on Prosocial Contagion.
青少年会效仿他们喜欢的同学的亲社会行为吗?一项关于亲社会行为传播的社会网络分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Jan;54(1):17-31. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02037-z. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
4
Reconsidering the failure model: Using a genetically controlled design to assess the spread of problems from reactive aggression to internalizing symptoms through peer rejection across the primary school years.重新思考失败模式:使用基因控制设计,评估从反应性攻击到同伴拒绝导致内化症状的问题在整个小学阶段的传播。
Child Dev. 2024 Jan-Feb;95(1):261-275. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13994. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
5
Social Network Methods for Assigning Students to Teams.社交网络方法在学生分组中的应用。
Prev Sci. 2022 Nov;23(8):1359-1369. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01402-3. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
6
Classroom Seat Proximity Predicts Friendship Formation.教室座位距离可预测友谊的形成。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 3;13:796002. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.796002. eCollection 2022.
7
What is the impact of structural and cultural factors and interventions within educational settings on promoting positive mental health and preventing poor mental health: a systematic review.教育环境中的结构和文化因素及干预措施对促进心理健康和预防心理健康不良的影响:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 17;22(1):524. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12894-7.
个体学校干预对具有攻击性行为儿童的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2013 Oct;41(5):525-48. doi: 10.1017/S1352465812000525. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
4
Changing peer perceptions and victimization through classroom arrangements: a field experiment.通过课堂安排改变同伴看法和受害情况:一项现场实验。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2012 Apr;40(3):403-12. doi: 10.1007/s10802-011-9567-6.
5
Antecedents and correlates of the popular-aggressive phenomenon in elementary school.小学中受欢迎-攻击性现象的前因和相关性。
Child Dev. 2010 May-Jun;81(3):837-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01437.x.
6
Peer deviancy training and peer coercion: dual processes associated with early-onset conduct problems.同伴偏差行为训练与同伴胁迫:与早发性行为问题相关的双重过程。
Child Dev. 2008 Mar-Apr;79(2):252-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01124.x.
7
School-based interventions for aggressive and disruptive behavior: update of a meta-analysis.针对攻击性行为和破坏性行为的校本干预措施:一项荟萃分析的更新
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Aug;33(2 Suppl):S130-43. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.04.011.
8
A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.群体间接触理论的元分析检验。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 May;90(5):751-83. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.
9
Disruptive behavior, peer association, and conduct disorder: testing the developmental links through early intervention.破坏性行为、同伴交往与品行障碍:通过早期干预检验发展关联。
Dev Psychopathol. 1999 Spring;11(2):287-304. doi: 10.1017/s0954579499002060.
10
A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys.同伴关系过程中的性别差异综述:对女孩和男孩情感与行为发展的潜在权衡。
Psychol Bull. 2006 Jan;132(1):98-131. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98.