Hoogsteder Larissa M, Stams Geert-Jan J M, Schippers Eveline E, Bonnes Daphne
1 de Waag Forensic Outpatient Treatment Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
2 University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 Oct;62(14):4403-4424. doi: 10.1177/0306624X18761267. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
This article describes a quasi-experimental study of the effectiveness of Responsive Aggression Regulation Therapy (Re-ART) in terms of recidivism for 16- to 21-year-old juveniles with aggression problems and high risk of recidivism. In a Dutch juvenile justice institution, an experimental group received Re-ART ( n = 63, Re-ART group) and a waitlist control group received Treatment as Usual ( n = 28, TAU group). Results indicated that Re-ART is significantly more effective than TAU in reducing the juveniles' recidivism risk for violent offending. Compared with the TAU group, the Re-ART group showed significantly less violent crimes after 2 and 3 years, less property crimes after 2 years, and less general recidivism after 2 and 3 years. There was no significant difference between groups in recidivism of property crimes with violence. Ethnicity, mild intellectual disabilities, substance abuse, and age did not moderate the effects on recidivism outcome, which indicates that Re-ART was equally effective for various groups.
本文描述了一项关于反应性攻击调节疗法（Re-ART）对有攻击问题且再犯风险高的16至21岁青少年再犯率有效性的准实验研究。在一家荷兰青少年司法机构中，一个实验组接受了Re-ART（n = 63，Re-ART组），一个候补控制组接受常规治疗（n = 28，TAU组）。结果表明，在降低青少年暴力犯罪的再犯风险方面，Re-ART比TAU显著更有效。与TAU组相比，Re-ART组在2年和3年后暴力犯罪显著减少，2年后财产犯罪减少，2年和3年后总体再犯率降低。在伴有暴力行为的财产犯罪再犯方面，两组之间没有显著差异。种族、轻度智力残疾、药物滥用和年龄并未调节对再犯结果的影响，这表明Re-ART对各个群体同样有效。
