• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Exploring the motivations of patients with type 2 diabetes to participate in clinical trials: a qualitative analysis.探索2型糖尿病患者参与临床试验的动机:一项定性分析。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Dec 12;2:34. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0050-y. eCollection 2016.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
4
Involving South Asian patients in clinical trials.让南亚患者参与临床试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Oct;8(42):iii, 1-109. doi: 10.3310/hta8420.
5
Accessing health services through the back door: a qualitative interview study investigating reasons why people participate in health research in Canada.走后门获取医疗服务:一项定性访谈研究,旨在调查加拿大民众参与健康研究的原因。
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Oct 12;14:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-40.
6
Understanding practice-based research participation: The differing motivations of engaged vs. non-engaged clinicians in pragmatic clinical trials.理解基于实践的研究参与:务实临床试验中参与和未参与的临床医生的不同动机。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Aug 23;4:136-140. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.08.003. eCollection 2016 Dec 15.
7
Patients' motivations and interest in research: characteristics of volunteers for patient-led projects on PatientsLikeMe.患者参与研究的动机和兴趣:PatientsLikeMe上患者主导项目的志愿者特征。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Dec 9;2:33. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0047-6. eCollection 2016.
8
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
9
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
10
South Asian patients' views and experiences of clinical trial participation.南亚患者对参与临床试验的看法和经历。
Fam Pract. 2004 Dec;21(6):636-42. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh611. Epub 2004 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Caregiver and Youth Characteristics That Influence Trust in Digital Health Platforms in Pediatric Care: Mixed Methods Study.照顾者和青少年特征对儿科护理中数字健康平台信任的影响:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 28;26:e53657. doi: 10.2196/53657.
2
Exploring the Motivational Drivers of Young Adults with Diabetes for Participation in Kidney Research.探索糖尿病青年成人参与肾脏研究的动机驱动因素。
J Patient Exp. 2022 Nov 13;9:23743735221138236. doi: 10.1177/23743735221138236. eCollection 2022.
3
Facilitating participation in cardiovascular preventive initiatives among people with diabetes: a qualitative study.促进糖尿病患者参与心血管疾病预防倡议:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 22;21(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10172-6.
4
Public views regarding the responsibility of patients, clinicians, and institutions to participate in research in the United States.美国公众对患者、临床医生和机构参与研究的责任的看法。
Clin Trials. 2019 Dec;16(6):574-579. doi: 10.1177/1740774519858917. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
5
Perceptions of the uses of routine general practice data beyond individual care in England: a qualitative study.英国对超出个体医疗范畴的常规全科医疗数据用途的认知:一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 8;8(1):e019378. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019378.

本文引用的文献

1
Why do patients decline surgical trials? Findings from a qualitative interview study embedded in the Cancer Research UK BOLERO trial (Bladder cancer: Open versus Lapararoscopic or RObotic cystectomy).患者为何拒绝参与手术试验?嵌入英国癌症研究中心BOLERO试验(膀胱癌:开放手术与腹腔镜或机器人膀胱切除术对比)的定性访谈研究结果
Trials. 2016 Jan 19;17:35. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1173-z.
2
Placebo in clinical trials.临床试验中的安慰剂
Perspect Clin Res. 2013 Jan;4(1):49-52. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.106383.
3
Estimating the current and future costs of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes in the UK, including direct health costs and indirect societal and productivity costs.估算英国 1 型和 2 型糖尿病的当前和未来成本,包括直接健康成本以及间接的社会和生产力成本。
Diabet Med. 2012 Jul;29(7):855-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03698.x.
4
Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas.患者参与作为对话:设定研究议程。
Health Expect. 2010 Jun;13(2):160-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00549.x.
5
From information processing to behavioral intentions: exploring cancer patients' motivations for clinical trial enrollment.从信息处理到行为意向:探索癌症患者参与临床试验的动机。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 May;79(2):231-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.08.010. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
6
Outcomes of patients who participate in randomized controlled trials compared to similar patients receiving similar interventions who do not participate.参与随机对照试验的患者与接受类似干预但未参与试验的类似患者的结局比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):MR000009. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000009.pub4.
7
Why patients continue to participate in clinical research.患者为何继续参与临床研究。
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jun 23;168(12):1294-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.12.1294.
8
Patient/Caregiver influences for declining participation in supportive oncology trials.患者/照顾者拒绝参与支持性肿瘤学试验的影响因素。
J Support Oncol. 2008 Apr;6(4):168-74.
9
Assessment of the benefits of user involvement in health research from the Warwick Diabetes Care Research User Group: a qualitative case study.沃里克糖尿病护理研究用户组对用户参与健康研究益处的评估:一项定性案例研究。
Health Expect. 2007 Sep;10(3):268-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00451.x.
10
Identifying motivations and barriers to patient participation in clinical trials.确定患者参与临床试验的动机和障碍。
J Cancer Educ. 2006 Winter;21(4):237-42. doi: 10.1080/08858190701347838.

探索2型糖尿病患者参与临床试验的动机:一项定性分析。

Exploring the motivations of patients with type 2 diabetes to participate in clinical trials: a qualitative analysis.

作者信息

Estcourt Stephanie, Epton Jill, Epton Tom, Vaidya Bijay, Daly Mark

机构信息

1Department of Research & Development, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, G9 Child Health Building, Barrack Road, Exeter, EX2 5DW UK.

Patient Public Involvement Group Representatives, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Dec 12;2:34. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0050-y. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-016-0050-y
PMID:29507768
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5831891/
Abstract

PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY

Certain patient groups are reluctant to engage with clinical research and consequently findings are not always truly representative of the wider population. With the emphasis on evidence-based clinical practice, clinical research as a core activity for the National Health Service (NHS) and the rising prevalence of diabetes within the United Kingdom (UK) it is important to understand what motivates people to volunteer for research in diabetes and identify the barriers to this involvement. This research interviewed 12 people with type 2 diabetes who had previously taken part in diabetes clinical trials. The transcripts of these interviews were analysed to identify themes that informed the study findings.There were wide ranging reasons for participating in clinical trials. Both altruistic and self-interest motivation were universally expressed. The thought of helping others was a powerful experience but for some there was a sense of duty to volunteer especially if they had benefited from NHS care. Participating was empowering, with extra access to healthcare professionals, practical information and support for their condition. Coping with the logistics of being in a trial relied upon a strong network of family and friends. Some felt anxious at the end of the trial having been supported during the research and appreciating the camaraderie of belonging to a group or team.This study provides insights into the motivations and barriers to involvement in clinical research in type 2 diabetes helping researchers to encourage and support more volunteers in clinical trials.

ABSTRACT

Certain patient groups are reluctant to engage with clinical research and consequently findings of the research are not always truly representative of the wider population. This, together with a growing prominence of evidence-based clinical practice, an increasing emphasis of clinical research as a core activity for the NHS and the rising prevalence of diabetes within the UK population, requires an understanding of motivations and barriers for patients consenting to participate in diabetes clinical trials. To understand patients' motivations for participating in clinical trials in type 2 diabetes. We conducted a qualitative study involving 12 participants with type 2 diabetes with previous involvement in clinical trials. Individual, tape-recorded, semi structured interviews were conducted to explore motivations and experiences of the participants. We carried out thematic content analysis to identify themes, from which theoretical interpretations were formed. There were wide ranging reasons for participating in clinical trials. We identified 3 key themes: (1) Motivations ranged from altruism to self-interest; (2) participation in clinical trials was an empowering experience; and (3) key to participation was a strong network of support. Patients are motivated to participate in clinical trials by a sense of altruism coupled with self-interest. This self-interest centres on the belief that participation would be an informative and empowering experience with increased access to healthcare professionals. However the ability to cope with the logistics of being in clinical trials relies upon an extensive and reliable network of support from family, friends, work colleagues and employers, together with a collaborative approach to their care from the researchers and their usual healthcare providers.

摘要

通俗易懂的总结

某些患者群体不愿参与临床研究,因此研究结果并不总是能真正代表更广泛的人群。鉴于强调循证临床实践、临床研究作为英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的核心活动日益重要,以及英国糖尿病患病率不断上升,了解促使人们自愿参与糖尿病研究的因素并找出参与的障碍至关重要。本研究采访了12名曾参与糖尿病临床试验的2型糖尿病患者。对这些访谈的文字记录进行分析,以确定形成研究结果的主题。参与临床试验的原因多种多样。利他动机和自身利益动机都普遍存在。帮助他人的想法是一种有力的体验,但对一些人来说,有自愿参与的责任感,特别是如果他们从NHS护理中受益。参与能赋予力量,可额外接触医疗保健专业人员、获取实用信息并获得针对其病情的支持。应对试验中的各种事务依赖于强大的家人和朋友网络。一些人在试验结束时感到焦虑,因为在研究过程中得到了支持,并且体会到了属于一个群体或团队的情谊。这项研究深入了解了参与2型糖尿病临床研究的动机和障碍,有助于研究人员鼓励和支持更多志愿者参与临床试验。

摘要

某些患者群体不愿参与临床研究,因此研究结果并不总是能真正代表更广泛的人群。这一点,再加上循证临床实践日益突出、临床研究作为NHS的核心活动越来越受到重视以及英国人群中糖尿病患病率不断上升,需要了解患者同意参与糖尿病临床试验的动机和障碍。为了解2型糖尿病患者参与临床试验的动机。我们进行了一项定性研究,涉及12名曾参与临床试验的2型糖尿病患者。进行了单独的、录音的、半结构化访谈,以探讨参与者的动机和经历。我们进行了主题内容分析以确定主题,并据此形成理论解释。参与临床试验的原因多种多样。我们确定了3个关键主题:(1)动机范围从利他主义到自身利益;(2)参与临床试验是一种赋予力量的体验;(3)参与的关键是强大的支持网络。患者参与临床试验的动机是利他主义感与自身利益相结合。这种自身利益集中在这样一种信念上,即参与将是一次有收获且能赋予力量的体验,能增加接触医疗保健专业人员的机会。然而,应对临床试验各种事务的能力依赖于来自家人、朋友、同事和雇主的广泛而可靠的支持网络,以及研究人员和其常规医疗保健提供者对其护理的协作方式。