• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项医师领导力项目的长期随访。

A long-term follow-up of a physician leadership program.

作者信息

Fassiotto Magali, Maldonado Yvonne, Hopkins Joseph

机构信息

Office of Faculty Development and Diversity, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

J Health Organ Manag. 2018 Mar 19;32(1):56-68. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-08-2017-0208. Epub 2017 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1108/JHOM-08-2017-0208
PMID:29508671
Abstract

Purpose Physician leadership programs serve to develop individual capabilities and to affect organizational outcomes. Evaluations of such programs often focus solely on short-term increases in individual capabilities. The purpose of this paper is to assess long-term individual and organizational outcomes of the Stanford Leadership Development Program. Design/methodology/approach There are three data sources for this mixed-methods study: a follow-up survey in 2013-2014 of program participants ( n=131) and matched (control) non-participants ( n=82) from the 2006 to 2011 program years; promotion and retention data; and qualitative in-person interview data. The authors analyzed survey data across leadership knowledge, skills, and attitudes as well as leadership titles held, following program participation using Pearson's χ test of independence. Using logistic regression, the authors analyzed promotion and retention among participants and non-participants. Finally, the authors applied both a grounded theory approach and qualitative content analysis to analyze interview data. Findings Program participants rated higher than non-participants across 25 of 30 items measuring leadership knowledge, skills, and attitudes, and were more likely to hold regional/national leadership titles and to have gained in leadership since program participation. Asian program participants were significantly more likely than Asian non-participants to have been promoted, and women participants were less likely to have left the institution than non-participants. Finally, qualitative interviews revealed the long-term impact of leadership learning and networking, as well as the enduring, sustained impact on the organization of projects undertaken during the program. Originality/value This study is unique in its long-term and comprehensive mixed-methods nature of evaluation to assess individual and organizational impact of a physician leadership program.

摘要

目的 医师领导力项目旨在培养个人能力并影响组织成果。对此类项目的评估往往仅关注个人能力的短期提升。本文的目的是评估斯坦福领导力发展项目的长期个人和组织成果。 设计/方法/途径 这项混合方法研究有三个数据来源:对2006年至2011年项目期间的项目参与者(n = 131)以及匹配的(对照)非参与者(n = 82)在2013 - 2014年进行的后续调查;晋升和留任数据;以及定性的面对面访谈数据。作者使用Pearson独立性χ检验分析了项目参与后在领导知识、技能和态度以及所担任的领导职位方面的调查数据。作者使用逻辑回归分析了参与者和非参与者的晋升和留任情况。最后,作者应用扎根理论方法和定性内容分析来分析访谈数据。 发现 在衡量领导知识、技能和态度的30项指标中的25项上,项目参与者的评分高于非参与者,并且更有可能担任地区/国家领导职位,且自参与项目以来在领导力方面有所提升。亚洲项目参与者比亚洲非参与者晋升的可能性显著更高,女性参与者比非参与者离开该机构的可能性更小。最后,定性访谈揭示了领导力学习和建立人际关系的长期影响,以及该项目期间所开展项目对组织的持久、持续影响。 原创性/价值 本研究的独特之处在于其长期且全面的混合方法评估性质,以评估医师领导力项目对个人和组织的影响。

相似文献

1
A long-term follow-up of a physician leadership program.一项医师领导力项目的长期随访。
J Health Organ Manag. 2018 Mar 19;32(1):56-68. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-08-2017-0208. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
2
Evaluating a physician leadership development program - a mixed methods approach.评估一个医师领导力发展项目——一种混合方法研究路径
J Health Organ Manag. 2016 May 16;30(3):390-407. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-11-2014-0187.
3
Designing a physician leadership development program based on effective models of physician education.基于有效的医师教育模式设计医师领导力发展项目。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2018 Oct/Dec;43(4):293-302. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000146.
4
Immersive Leadership Training for Physicians: Comparing Retrospective Pre- and Post-Test Virtual vs in-Person 6-Month Follow-Up of Learning.针对医生的沉浸式领导力培训:比较回顾性前后测试中虚拟培训与面对面培训6个月学习随访情况。
J Healthc Leadersh. 2024 Jun 24;16:235-254. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S455105. eCollection 2024.
5
First and foremost, physicians: the clinical versus leadership identities of physician leaders.首先也是最重要的,医生们:医生领导者的临床身份与领导身份。
J Health Organ Manag. 2016 Jun 20;30(4):711-28. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-05-2015-0079.
6
An evaluation of a leadership development coaching and mentoring programme.一项领导力发展辅导与指导计划的评估
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2017 Jul 3;30(3):309-329. doi: 10.1108/LHS-07-2016-0030.
7
Developing the master educator: cross disciplinary teaching scholars program for human and veterinary medical faculty.培养主教育者:面向人类医学和兽医学教师的跨学科教学学者项目
Acad Psychiatry. 2007 Nov-Dec;31(6):452-64. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.31.6.452.
8
Misprescribing controlled substances: An evaluation of a professional development program.受控物质的处方不当:一项专业发展计划的评估
Subst Abus. 2016 Jul-Sep;37(3):412-418. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2015.1096318. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
9
Studer Group® ' s evidence-based leadership initiatives.施图德集团基于证据的领导力倡议。
J Health Organ Manag. 2015;29(6):684-700. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-10-2013-0211.
10
Integrative medicine: implementation and evaluation of a professional development program using experiential learning and conceptual change teaching approaches.整合医学:一项运用体验式学习和概念转变教学方法的专业发展计划的实施与评估
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jul;62(1):5-12. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.03.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Sustained Impact of an Intramural Faculty Leadership Training Program at an Academic Medical Center.学术医疗中心内部教员领导力培训项目的持续影响
J Healthc Leadersh. 2025 Jul 31;17:343-354. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S525705. eCollection 2025.
2
Gold standard research and evidence applied: The Inspire Nursing Leadership Program.金标准研究和证据应用:Inspire 护理领导力计划。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2024 May;37(3):141-150. doi: 10.1177/08404704241236908. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
3
Comparing Virtual vs In-Person Immersive Leadership Training for Physicians.
比较针对医生的虚拟沉浸式领导力培训与面对面沉浸式领导力培训
J Healthc Leadersh. 2023 Aug 11;15:139-152. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S411091. eCollection 2023.
4
Linking leadership development programs for physicians with organization-level outcomes: a realist review.将医师领导力发展计划与组织层面结果联系起来:一个现实主义的综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 21;23(1):783. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09811-y.
5
Using a Modified Delphi Approach and Nominal Group Technique for Organisational Priority Setting of Evidence-Based Interventions That Advance Women in Healthcare Leadership.采用改良德尔菲法和名义群体技术对促进女性医疗保健领导力的循证干预措施进行组织优先级排序。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 17;19(22):15202. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215202.
6
Moving beyond 'think leadership, think white male': the contents and contexts of equity, diversity and inclusion in physician leadership programmes.超越“思考领导力,想到白人男性”:医生领导力项目中公平、多样性和包容性的内容与背景。
BMJ Lead. 2022 Jun;6(2):146-157. doi: 10.1136/leader-2021-000542. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
7
Gender Equity in Radiation Oncology: Culture Change Is a Marathon, Not a Sprint.放射肿瘤学中的性别平等:文化变革是一场马拉松,而非短跑。
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022 Mar 9;7(4):100937. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100937. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug.
8
Advancing women in healthcare leadership: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of multi-sector evidence on organisational interventions.提升女性在医疗保健领域的领导力:关于组织干预措施的多部门证据的系统评价与元综合分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Aug 12;39:101084. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101084. eCollection 2021 Sep.
9
What Women Need: a Study of Institutional Factors and Women Faculty's Intent to Remain in Academic Medicine.女性的需求:制度因素与女性教职员工留在学术医学领域意愿的研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):2039-2047. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06771-z. Epub 2021 May 10.
10
A Qualitative Analysis of Maternal and Child Health Public Health Leadership Institute (MCH PHLI) Leaders: Assessing the Application of Leadership Skills at the "Others" and "Wider Community" Levels of the MCH Leadership Competencies 4.0.对孕产妇和儿童健康公共卫生领导力学院(MCH PHLI)领导者的定性分析:评估领导力技能在 MCH 领导力能力 4.0 的“他人”和“更广泛社区”层面的应用。
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Sep;25(9):1437-1446. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03134-2. Epub 2021 May 5.