Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Center on Aging and Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018 Apr 17;73(5):668-675. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly029.
Physical activity (PA) prevents disease and promotes longevity; yet, few older adults meet the recommended daily guidelines. Wearable PA and heart rate monitors provide the opportunity to define age-related differences in the absolute and relative intensity of daily activities, and provide insight into the underlying factors influencing PA in older adults.
Participants in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (n = 440, 52% male, aged 31 to 88 years) completed a clinical assessment and wore an Actiheart monitor in the free-living environment. The association between age and minutes per day in sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous PA was assessed using relative intensity, as defined by heart rate reserve, and absolute intensity using activity count thresholds.
In cross-sectional analyses, time spent in sedentary and light activities as defined by relative intensity did not differ across age (p > 0.05), whereas time spent in moderate and vigorous relative PA was higher for each 1 year increase in age (p < .01). Using absolute intensity PA thresholds, older adults registered fewer activity counts per day with more sedentary time and lesser amounts of light, moderate, and vigorous PA (p < .05). Persons with higher relative and lower absolute PA intensity had poorer functional performance and higher subclinical disease indicators.
These findings suggest that time spent in moderate or higher intensity activities may not be lower with age after considering changes in physiology, functional ability, and subclinical disease burden and highlight the need for more age- and ability-specific PA research to inform future interventions and public health guidelines.
身体活动(PA)可预防疾病并延长寿命;然而,很少有老年人达到推荐的每日活动量标准。可穿戴式 PA 和心率监测器提供了一个机会,可以定义与年龄相关的日常活动绝对和相对强度的差异,并深入了解影响老年人 PA 的潜在因素。
巴尔的摩老龄化纵向研究(Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging,BLSA)的参与者(n = 440,52%为男性,年龄 31 至 88 岁)完成了临床评估,并在自由活动环境中佩戴 Actiheart 监测器。使用心率储备定义的相对强度以及使用活动计数阈值定义的绝对强度,评估年龄与每天久坐、低强度、中强度和高强度 PA 分钟数之间的关系。
在横断面分析中,以相对强度定义的久坐和低强度活动时间在不同年龄组之间没有差异(p > 0.05),而随着年龄每增加 1 岁,中强度和高强度相对 PA 时间增加(p <.01)。使用绝对强度 PA 阈值,老年人每天的活动计数较少,久坐时间较长,低强度、中强度和高强度 PA 较少(p <.05)。具有较高相对和较低绝对 PA 强度的人功能表现较差,亚临床疾病指标较高。
这些发现表明,在考虑生理变化、功能能力和亚临床疾病负担后,中高强度活动的时间可能不会随着年龄的增长而减少,这强调了需要进行更多针对年龄和能力的 PA 研究,为未来的干预措施和公共卫生指南提供信息。