Suppr超能文献

利用粪便、直肠拭子和黏膜样本评估肠道微生物群落的种间和个体间变异性。

Inter-niche and inter-individual variation in gut microbial community assessment using stool, rectal swab, and mucosal samples.

机构信息

Department of Bioinformatics and Genomics, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA.

Department of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 7;8(1):4139. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22408-4.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate similarities and differences in gut bacterial measurements and stability in the microbial communities of three different types of samples that could be used to assess different niches of the gut microbiome: rectal swab, stool, and normal rectal mucosa samples. In swab-stool comparisons, there were substantial taxa differences with some taxa varying largely by sample type (e.g. Thermaceae), inter-individual subject variation (e.g. Desulfovibrionaceae), or by both sample type and participant (e.g. Enterobacteriaceae). Comparing all three sample types with whole-genome metagenome shotgun sequencing, swab samples were much closer to stool samples than mucosa samples although all KEGG functional Level 1 and Level 2 pathways were significantly different across all sample types (e.g. transcription and environmental adaptation). However, the individual signature of participants was also observed and was largely stable between two time points. Thus, we found that while the distribution of some taxa was associated with these different sampling techniques, other taxa largely reflected individual differences in the microbial community that were insensitive to sampling technique. There is substantial variability in the assessment of the gut microbial community according to the type of sample.

摘要

本研究旨在评估三种不同类型的样本中肠道细菌测量值和微生物群落稳定性的相似性和差异,这些样本可用于评估肠道微生物组的不同生态位:直肠拭子、粪便和正常直肠黏膜样本。在拭子-粪便比较中,存在大量的分类群差异,一些分类群在样本类型上有很大差异(例如 Thermaceae),个体间的变化(例如 Desulfovibrionaceae),或受样本类型和参与者的共同影响(例如 Enterobacteriaceae)。将所有三种样本类型与全基因组宏基因组鸟枪法测序进行比较,尽管所有样本类型的所有 KEGG 功能水平 1 和水平 2 途径均存在显著差异(例如转录和环境适应),但拭子样本与粪便样本更为接近,而与黏膜样本的差异较大。然而,也观察到了参与者的个体特征,并且在两个时间点之间基本稳定。因此,我们发现,尽管某些分类群的分布与这些不同的采样技术有关,但其他分类群在很大程度上反映了微生物群落的个体差异,而这些差异对采样技术不敏感。根据样本类型,对肠道微生物群落的评估存在很大的变异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56b5/5841359/728b133022fc/41598_2018_22408_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验