Suppr超能文献

关于嗅觉功能障碍的立场文件。

Position paper on olfactory dysfunction.

作者信息

Hummel T, Whitcroft K L, Andrews P, Altundag A, Cinghi C, Costanzo R M, Damm M, Frasnelli J, Gudziol H, Gupta N, Haehne A, Holbrook E, Hong S C, Hornung D, Hüttenbrink K B, Kamel R, Kobayashi M, Konstantinidis I, Landis B N, Leopold D A, Macchi A, Miwa T, Moesges R, Mullol J, Mueller C A, Ottaviano G, Passali G C, Philpott C, Pinto J M, Ramakrishnan V J, Rombaux P, Roth Y, Schlosser R A, Shu B, Soler G, Stjärne P, Stuck B A, Vodicka J, Welge-Luessen A

出版信息

Rhinol Suppl. 2017 Mar;54(26):1-30. doi: 10.4193/Rhino16.248.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Olfactory dysfunction is an increasingly recognised condition, associated with reduced quality of life and major health outcomes such as neurodegeneration and death. However, translational research in this field is limited by heterogeneity in methodological approach, including definitions of impairment, improvement and appropriate assessment techniques. Accordingly, effective treatments for smell loss are limited. In an effort to encourage high quality and comparable work in this field, among others, we propose the following ideas and recommendations. Whilst the full set of recommendations are outlined in the main document, points include the following: • Patients with suspected olfactory loss should undergo a full examination of the head and neck, including rigid nasal endoscopy with small diameter endoscopes. • Subjective olfactory assessment should not be undertaken in isolation, given its poor reliability. • Psychophysical assessment tools used in clinical and research settings should include reliable and validated tests of odour threshold, and/or one of odour identification or discrimination. • Comprehensive chemosensory assessment should include gustatory screening. • Smell training can be helpful in patients with olfactory loss of several aetiologies.

CONCLUSIONS

We hope the current manuscript will encourage clinicians and researchers to adopt a common language, and in so doing, increase the methodological quality, consistency and generalisability of work in this field.

摘要

背景

嗅觉功能障碍是一种日益受到认可的病症,与生活质量下降以及神经退行性变和死亡等重大健康后果相关。然而,该领域的转化研究受到方法学方法异质性的限制,包括损伤、改善的定义以及适当的评估技术。因此,嗅觉丧失的有效治疗方法有限。为鼓励该领域及其他领域开展高质量且具有可比性的研究,我们提出以下想法和建议。虽然完整的建议在主文档中列出,但要点如下:

• 疑似嗅觉丧失的患者应接受全面的头颈部检查,包括使用小直径内窥镜进行硬性鼻内镜检查。

• 鉴于主观嗅觉评估可靠性较差,不应单独进行。

• 临床和研究环境中使用的心理物理学评估工具应包括可靠且经过验证的气味阈值测试,和/或气味识别或辨别测试之一。

• 全面的化学感觉评估应包括味觉筛查。

• 嗅觉训练对多种病因导致嗅觉丧失的患者可能有帮助。

结论

我们希望当前的稿件能鼓励临床医生和研究人员采用共同的语言,从而提高该领域研究的方法学质量、一致性和可推广性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验