Reproducibility of research: Issues and proposed remedies.
作者信息
Allison David B, Shiffrin Richard M, Stodden Victoria
机构信息
Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405;
出版信息
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2561-2562. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802324115. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reproducibility of research: Issues and proposed remedies.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2561-2562. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802324115. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
2
The use of herbal remedies by adolescents with eating disorders.
Int J Eat Disord. 2004 Mar;35(2):223-8. doi: 10.1002/eat.10248.
4
Gas discharge visualization evaluation of ultramolecular doses of homeopathic medicines under blinded, controlled conditions.
J Altern Complement Med. 2003 Feb;9(1):25-38. doi: 10.1089/107555303321222928.
5
Do Bach flower remedies have a role to play in pain control? A critical analysis investigating therapeutic value beyond the placebo effect, and the potential of Bach flower remedies as a psychological method of pain relief.
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2007 Aug;13(3):174-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2007.03.001. Epub 2007 Apr 23.
6
Reproducibility of results with homeopathic remedies.
CMAJ. 1999 Apr 20;160(8):1128-9.
7
Rat models of acute inflammation: a randomized controlled study on the effects of homeopathic remedies.
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2007 Jan 17;7:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-7-1.
8
9
The use and the user of herbal remedies during pregnancy.
J Altern Complement Med. 2009 Jul;15(7):787-92. doi: 10.1089/acm.2008.0467.
10
The scorpion in Spanish folk medicine: a review of traditional remedies for stings and its use as a therapeutic resource.
J Ethnopharmacol. 2013 Mar 7;146(1):62-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2012.12.033. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
引用本文的文献
1
Dialogues about the practice of science.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Feb 4;122(5):e2423782122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2423782122. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
2
Assessing fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized controlled trials assessing pharmacological therapies for opioid use disorders: a systematic review.
Trials. 2024 Apr 27;25(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08104-x.
3
Unacceptable use of substandard metrics in policy decisions which mandate large reductions in animal-source foods.
NPJ Sci Food. 2024 Feb 5;8(1):10. doi: 10.1038/s41538-024-00249-y.
4
Review of the Electrospinning Process and the Electro-Conversion of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) into Added-Value Chemicals.
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jun 19;15(12):4336. doi: 10.3390/ma15124336.
5
Performance-Based Screening of Porous Materials for Carbon Capture.
Chem Rev. 2021 Sep 8;121(17):10666-10741. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01266. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
6
Dated phylogeny suggests early Neolithic origin of Sino-Tibetan languages.
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 27;10(1):20792. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77404-4.
7
The Rigor and Transparency Index Quality Metric for Assessing Biological and Medical Science Methods.
iScience. 2020 Oct 20;23(11):101698. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101698. eCollection 2020 Nov 20.
8
Better together: Elements of successful scientific software development in a distributed collaborative community.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 May 4;16(5):e1007507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007507. eCollection 2020 May.
9
Setting the basis of best practices and standards for curation and annotation of logical models in biology-highlights of the [BC]2 2019 CoLoMoTo/SysMod Workshop.
Brief Bioinform. 2021 Mar 22;22(2):1848-1859. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaa046.
10
Does repeat synthesis in materials chemistry obey a power law?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jan 14;117(2):877-882. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1918484117. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
本文引用的文献
1
Scientific progress despite irreproducibility: A seeming paradox.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2632-2639. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711786114.
2
Metastudies for robust tests of theory.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2607-2612. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708285114. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
3
The preregistration revolution.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2600-2606. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708274114.
4
Standards for design and measurement would make clinical research reproducible and usable.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2590-2594. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708273114.
5
Issues with data and analyses: Errors, underlying themes, and potential solutions.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2563-2570. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708279115.
6
Crisis or self-correction: Rethinking media narratives about the well-being of science.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2620-2627. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708276114.
7
Training replicable predictors in multiple studies.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2578-2583. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708283115. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
8
Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2628-2631. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708272114.
9
An empirical analysis of journal policy effectiveness for computational reproducibility.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2584-2589. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708290115. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
10
Enhancing primary reports of randomized controlled trials: Three most common challenges and suggested solutions.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2595-2599. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708286114. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
Zotero 插件