• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年代久远的系统发生关系表明汉藏语系起源于新石器时代早期。

Dated phylogeny suggests early Neolithic origin of Sino-Tibetan languages.

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University College London, London, WC1H 0BW, UK.

Key Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Conservation Biology, Centre for Computational and Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 27;10(1):20792. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77404-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-77404-4
PMID:33247154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7695722/
Abstract

An accurate reconstruction of Sino-Tibetan language evolution would greatly advance our understanding of East Asian population history. Two recent phylogenetic studies attempted to do so but several of their conclusions are different from each other. Here we reconstruct the phylogeny of the Sino-Tibetan language family, using Bayesian computational methods applied to a larger and linguistically more diverse sample. Our results confirm previous work in finding that the ancestral Sino-Tibetans first split into Sinitic and Tibeto-Burman clades, and support the existence of key internal relationships. But we find that the initial divergence of this group occurred earlier than previously suggested, at approximately 8000 years before the present, coinciding with the onset of millet-based agriculture and significant environmental changes in the Yellow River region. Our findings illustrate that key aspects of phylogenetic history can be replicated in this complex language family, and calls for a more nuanced understanding of the first Sino-Tibetan speakers in relation to the "early farming dispersal" theory of language evolution.

摘要

对汉藏语系语言演化进行准确重构,将极大地促进我们对东亚人口历史的理解。最近的两项系统发生学研究试图实现这一目标,但它们的一些结论彼此不同。在这里,我们使用贝叶斯计算方法,对更大、更具语言多样性的样本进行分析,重建了汉藏语系的系统发生关系。我们的研究结果证实了先前的工作,即汉藏语系的祖先首先分裂为汉和藏缅两个分支,并支持关键内部关系的存在。但我们发现,这一组的最初分化发生在更早的时期,大约在 8000 年前,与黄河流域小米农业的出现和重大环境变化同时发生。我们的研究结果表明,在这个复杂的语系中,系统发生历史的关键方面可以得到复制,并呼吁对最初的汉藏语使用者与语言演化的“早期农业扩散”理论之间的关系有更细致的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c474/7695722/65c7b5db594d/41598_2020_77404_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c474/7695722/73fd786e65a3/41598_2020_77404_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c474/7695722/65c7b5db594d/41598_2020_77404_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c474/7695722/73fd786e65a3/41598_2020_77404_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c474/7695722/65c7b5db594d/41598_2020_77404_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Dated phylogeny suggests early Neolithic origin of Sino-Tibetan languages.年代久远的系统发生关系表明汉藏语系起源于新石器时代早期。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 27;10(1):20792. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77404-4.
2
Phylogenetic evidence for Sino-Tibetan origin in northern China in the Late Neolithic.中国北方新石器时代晚期藏汉同源的进化证据。
Nature. 2019 May;569(7754):112-115. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1153-z. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
3
Peopling History of the Tibetan Plateau and Multiple Waves of Admixture of Tibetans Inferred From Both Ancient and Modern Genome-Wide Data.基于古代和现代全基因组数据推断的青藏高原人类定居历史及藏族的多次混合事件
Front Genet. 2021 Sep 3;12:725243. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.725243. eCollection 2021.
4
Archaeological evidence for initial migration of Neolithic Proto Sino-Tibetan speakers from Yellow River valley to Tibetan Plateau.新石器时代原始汉藏语族群从黄河流域向青藏高原的初步迁徙的考古证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Dec 20;119(51):e2212006119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2212006119. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
5
Genomic formation of Tibeto-Burman speaking populations in Guizhou, Southwest China.中国西南贵州地区说藏缅语族群的基因组形成。
BMC Genomics. 2023 Nov 7;24(1):672. doi: 10.1186/s12864-023-09767-7.
6
Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tibetan.年代语言谱系揭示了汉藏语系的起源。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 21;116(21):10317-10322. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817972116. Epub 2019 May 6.
7
The genomic history of southwestern Chinese populations demonstrated massive population migration and admixture among proto-Hmong-Mien speakers and incoming migrants.中国西南人群的基因组历史表明,在原孟-高棉语族群和外来移民之间发生了大规模的人口迁移和混合。
Mol Genet Genomics. 2022 Jan;297(1):241-262. doi: 10.1007/s00438-021-01837-3. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
8
Reconstruction of Y-chromosome phylogeny reveals two neolithic expansions of Tibeto-Burman populations.重建 Y 染色体系统发育揭示了藏缅族群的两次新石器时代扩张。
Mol Genet Genomics. 2018 Oct;293(5):1293-1300. doi: 10.1007/s00438-018-1461-2. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
9
Genomic history and forensic characteristics of Sherpa highlanders on the Tibetan Plateau inferred from high-resolution InDel panel and genome-wide SNPs.基于高分辨率 InDel 面板和全基因组 SNPs 推断的青藏高原夏尔巴高原人的基因组历史和法医特征。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2022 Jan;56:102633. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102633. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
10
Neolithic millet farmers contributed to the permanent settlement of the Tibetan Plateau by adopting barley agriculture.新石器时代的粟农通过采用大麦种植,促进了青藏高原的永久定居。
Natl Sci Rev. 2019 Oct;6(5):1005-1013. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwz080. Epub 2019 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The Indo-European Cognate Relationships dataset.印欧语同源关系数据集。
Sci Data. 2025 Sep 2;12(1):1541. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-05445-3.
2
A macroevolutionary analysis of European Late Upper Palaeolithic stone tool shape using a Bayesian phylodynamic framework.使用贝叶斯系统发育动力学框架对欧洲旧石器时代晚期石器形状进行宏观进化分析。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Aug 14;11(8):240321. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240321. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Investigating environmental effects on phonology using diachronic models.运用历时模型研究环境对音系学的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Neolithic millet farmers contributed to the permanent settlement of the Tibetan Plateau by adopting barley agriculture.新石器时代的粟农通过采用大麦种植,促进了青藏高原的永久定居。
Natl Sci Rev. 2019 Oct;6(5):1005-1013. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwz080. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
2
Ancient DNA indicates human population shifts and admixture in northern and southern China.古 DNA 表明中国北方和南方的人口迁移和混合。
Science. 2020 Jul 17;369(6501):282-288. doi: 10.1126/science.aba0909. Epub 2020 May 14.
3
What is replication?复制是什么?
Evol Hum Sci. 2024 Jan 3;6:e8. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2023.33. eCollection 2024.
4
Inferring language dispersal patterns with velocity field estimation.利用速度场估计推断语言扩散模式。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jan 2;15(1):190. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44430-5.
5
Whole mitochondrial genome analysis in highland Tibetans: further matrilineal genetic structure exploration.藏族高原人群线粒体全基因组分析:母系遗传结构的进一步探索
Front Genet. 2023 Nov 14;14:1221388. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1221388. eCollection 2023.
6
Cultural extinction in evolutionary perspective.进化视角下的文化灭绝
Evol Hum Sci. 2021 Apr 23;3:e30. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.25. eCollection 2021.
7
Phylogenetic insight into the origin of tones.声调起源的系统发育研究
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Jul 12;290(2002):20230606. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0606. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
8
Archaeological evidence for initial migration of Neolithic Proto Sino-Tibetan speakers from Yellow River valley to Tibetan Plateau.新石器时代原始汉藏语族群从黄河流域向青藏高原的初步迁徙的考古证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Dec 20;119(51):e2212006119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2212006119. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
9
Impact of cultural and genetic structure on food choices along the Silk Road.丝绸之路沿线文化和遗传结构对食物选择的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov 22;119(47):e2209311119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2209311119. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
10
Triangulation supports agricultural spread of the Transeurasian languages.三角测量法支持了泛欧亚语系在农业上的传播。
Nature. 2021 Nov;599(7886):616-621. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04108-8. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
PLoS Biol. 2020 Mar 27;18(3):e3000691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691. eCollection 2020 Mar.
4
Discontinuous spread of millet agriculture in eastern Asia and prehistoric population dynamics.东亚小米农业的不连续传播和史前人口动态。
Sci Adv. 2019 Sep 25;5(9):eaax6225. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax6225. eCollection 2019 Sep.
5
Sedentism and plant cultivation in northeast China emerged during affluent conditions.中国东北地区的定居和植物栽培是在富足的条件下出现的。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 18;14(7):e0218751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218751. eCollection 2019.
6
Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tibetan.年代语言谱系揭示了汉藏语系的起源。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 21;116(21):10317-10322. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817972116. Epub 2019 May 6.
7
Phylogenetic evidence for Sino-Tibetan origin in northern China in the Late Neolithic.中国北方新石器时代晚期藏汉同源的进化证据。
Nature. 2019 May;569(7754):112-115. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1153-z. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
8
Reconstruction of Y-chromosome phylogeny reveals two neolithic expansions of Tibeto-Burman populations.重建 Y 染色体系统发育揭示了藏缅族群的两次新石器时代扩张。
Mol Genet Genomics. 2018 Oct;293(5):1293-1300. doi: 10.1007/s00438-018-1461-2. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
9
Reproducibility of research: Issues and proposed remedies.研究的可重复性:问题与建议的补救措施。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2561-2562. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802324115. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
10
Ancestral Origins and Genetic History of Tibetan Highlanders.藏族高地人的祖先起源与遗传史
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Sep 1;99(3):580-594. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Aug 25.