Caudwell Kim M, Hagger Martin S
Health Psychology and Behavioural Medicine Research Group, School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, 6530, Australia,
J Behav Med. 2014 Dec;37(6):1252-62. doi: 10.1007/s10865-014-9573-6. Epub 2014 May 27.
The present study investigated how pre-drinking could be explained using a model based on dual-systems theory, incorporating measures of explicit and implicit constructs. Undergraduate students (N = 144; 44 male; 100 female; M age = 20.1 years), completed an online survey comprising measures of pre-drinking motives, a measure of pre-drinking cost motives, and an alcohol identity implicit association test. Variance-based structural equation modelling revealed that the predictors explained 34.8% of the variance in typical pre-drinking alcohol consumption and 25% of the variance in alcohol-related harm. Cost, interpersonal enhancement, and barriers to consumption motives predicted higher typical pre-drinking alcohol consumption and greater alcohol-related harm. Higher situational control scores predicted lower typical pre-drinking alcohol consumption, and lower alcohol-related harm. Positive implicit alcohol identity predicted alcohol-related harm, but not typical alcohol consumption. Results indicate that a dual-systems approach to pre-drinking has utility in predicting alcohol-related harm and may inform interventions to reduce excessive alcohol consumption and associated harm.
本研究探讨了如何使用基于双系统理论的模型来解释预饮酒行为,该模型纳入了显性和隐性结构的测量指标。本科生(N = 144;44名男性;100名女性;平均年龄 = 20.1岁)完成了一项在线调查,其中包括预饮酒动机测量、预饮酒成本动机测量以及酒精身份隐性联想测试。基于方差的结构方程模型显示,预测因素解释了典型预饮酒量中34.8%的方差以及与酒精相关危害中25%的方差。成本、人际增强和消费动机障碍预测了更高的典型预饮酒量和更大的与酒精相关的危害。更高的情境控制得分预测了更低的典型预饮酒量和更低的与酒精相关的危害。积极的隐性酒精身份预测了与酒精相关的危害,但未预测典型饮酒量。结果表明,双系统方法在预测与酒精相关的危害方面具有实用性,并且可能为减少过度饮酒及相关危害的干预措施提供信息。