Occupational Hygiene Department, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Occupational Hygiene Engineering, Esfarayen Faculty of Medical Sciences, Esfarayen, Iran.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2018 Jul;91(5):537-545. doi: 10.1007/s00420-018-1301-z. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
This study aimed to investigate the effect of whole-body vibration and ambient lighting, as well as their combined effect on human discomfort, heart rate, and reaction time in laboratory conditions.
44 men were recruited with an average age of 25.4 ± 1.9 years. Each participant was subjected to 12 experimental steps, each step lasting five minutes for four different vibration accelerations in X, Y, and Z axes at a fixed frequency; three different lighting intensities of 50, 500, and 1000 lx were also considered. At each step, a visual computerized reaction test was taken from subjects and their heart rate recorded by pulse oximeter. In addition, the discomfort rate of subjects was measured using Borg scale.
Increasing vibration acceleration significantly increased the discomfort rate and heart beat but not the reaction time. Lack of lighting caused more discomfort in the subjects, but there was no significant correlation between lighting intensity with heart rate and reaction time. The results also showed that the combined effect of vibration and lighting had no significant effect on any of the discomfort, heart rate, and reaction time variables.
Whole-body vibration is an important factor in the development of human subjective and physiological reactions compared to lighting. Therefore, consideration of the level of vibration to which an individual is exposed in workplaces subject to vibration plays an important role in reducing the level of human discomfort, but its interaction with ambient lighting does not have a significant effect on human subjective and physiological responses.
本研究旨在探讨全身振动和环境照明,以及它们在实验室条件下对人体不适、心率和反应时间的综合影响。
招募了 44 名平均年龄为 25.4±1.9 岁的男性。每位参与者接受 12 个实验步骤,每个步骤持续 5 分钟,在 X、Y 和 Z 轴上以固定频率进行四种不同的振动加速度;还考虑了三种不同的照明强度,分别为 50、500 和 1000 lx。在每个步骤中,通过视觉计算机反应测试来记录受试者的反应时间,并通过脉搏血氧仪记录他们的心率。此外,还使用 Borg 量表测量受试者的不适率。
增加振动加速度显著增加了不适率和心率,但不影响反应时间。照明不足会导致受试者更加不适,但照明强度与心率和反应时间之间没有显著相关性。结果还表明,振动和照明的综合效应对任何不适、心率和反应时间变量均没有显著影响。
与照明相比,全身振动是人体主观和生理反应发展的一个重要因素。因此,在考虑振动场所个体所暴露的振动水平时,在降低人体不适水平方面起着重要作用,但与环境照明的相互作用对人体主观和生理反应没有显著影响。