《临床学习环境、督导及护士教师评价量表（CLES+T）韩文版量表的效度与信度》
[Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version Scale of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher Evaluation Scale (CLES+T)].
作者信息
Kim Sun Hee, Yoo So Yeon, Kim Yae Young
机构信息
Department of Nursing, Daegu Catholic University, Daegu, Korea.
Department of Nursing, Kyungil University, Gyeongsan, Korea.
出版信息
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2018 Feb;48(1):70-84. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2018.48.1.70.
PURPOSE
This study was conducted to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the clinical learning environment, supervision and nurse teacher evaluation scale (CLES+T) that measures the clinical learning environment and the conditions associated with supervision and nurse teachers.
METHODS
The English CLES+T was translated into Korean with forward and back translation. Survey data were collected from 434 nursing students who had more than four days of clinical practice in Korean hospitals. Internal consistency reliability and construct validity using confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis were conducted. SPSS 20.0 and AMOS 22.0 programs were used for data analysis.
RESULTS
The exploratory factor analysis revealed seven factors for the thirty three-item scale. Confirmatory factor analysis supported good convergent and discriminant validities. The Cronbach's alpha for the overall scale was .94 and for the seven subscales ranged from .78 to .94.
CONCLUSION
The findings suggest that the 33-items Korean CLES+T is an appropriate instrument to measure Korean nursing students'clinical learning environment with good validity and reliability.
目的
本研究旨在评估韩语版临床学习环境、督导与护士教师评价量表（CLES+T）的有效性和可靠性，该量表用于衡量临床学习环境以及与督导和护士教师相关的条件。
方法
通过正向和反向翻译将英文版CLES+T翻译成韩语。从434名在韩国医院有超过四天临床实习经历的护理专业学生中收集调查数据。采用验证性和探索性因素分析进行内部一致性信度和结构效度分析。使用SPSS 20.0和AMOS 22.0程序进行数据分析。
结果
探索性因素分析显示，33项量表有七个因素。验证性因素分析支持了良好的收敛效度和区分效度。总量表的Cronbach's alpha系数为0.94，七个子量表的系数范围为0.78至0.94。
结论
研究结果表明，33项韩语版CLES+T是衡量韩国护理专业学生临床学习环境的合适工具，具有良好的效度和信度。
Zotero 插件