• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理职业自我效能量表韩文版的验证:一种方法论研究。

Validation of the Korean Version of the Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale: A Methodological Study.

机构信息

College of Nursing, Institute of Health Science, Inje University, Busan 47392, Korea.

Department of Nursing, Wonkwang University, Iksan 54538, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 26;18(3):1080. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031080.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18031080
PMID:33530442
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7908233/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy (NPSE) scale was developed to reflect the characteristics of nursing tasks. This study was conducted to validate the Korean version of the NPSE (K-NPSE) scale.

METHODS

The NPSE scale with nineteen items was translated into Korean after forward and backward translation according to Devellis' guideline. For the exploratory factor analysis (EFA), 298 nurses participated and criterion-related validity and reliability were verified. For the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), 218 other nurses participated. Content validity, criterion-related validity, and internal consistency reliability were examined. Additionally, construct validity was examined. SPSS and AMOS were used for the data analyses.

RESULTS

Nineteen items were selected after evaluating the content and cognitive validity and comprised three factors: "Professional (10 items)", "Advocating (4)", and "Caring (5)". Construct validity was supported by the CFA. Criterion-related validity was supported by comparison with the General Self-Efficacy Test (r = 0.43, < 0.001). Cronbach's alpha of the K-NPSE was 0.93.

CONCLUSIONS

Study findings indicate that the K-NPSE could be useful for assessing nurses' self-efficacy. The K-NPSE may be used as a valuable reference for developing programs or policies that promote nursing professionals. It is expected that continued use of this scale in various clinical settings to further generalize and validate the scale.

摘要

背景

护理职业自我效能感(NPSE)量表是为反映护理任务的特点而开发的。本研究旨在验证 NPSE 的韩文版(K-NPSE)量表。

方法

根据 Devellis 的指南,经过正向和反向翻译,NPSE 量表有 19 个项目被翻译成韩文。为了进行探索性因素分析(EFA),有 298 名护士参与,同时验证了效标关联效度和信度。为了进行验证性因素分析(CFA),有 218 名其他护士参与。检验了内容效度、效标关联效度和内部一致性信度。此外,还检验了构念效度。使用 SPSS 和 AMOS 进行数据分析。

结果

经过评估内容和认知效度,选择了 19 个项目,包括三个因素:“专业(10 项)”、“倡导(4 项)”和“关怀(5 项)”。CFA 支持了构念效度。与一般自我效能感测验的相关性(r = 0.43,<0.001)支持了效标关联效度。K-NPSE 的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.93。

结论

研究结果表明,K-NPSE 可用于评估护士的自我效能感。K-NPSE 可作为制定促进护理专业人员发展计划或政策的有用参考。预计在各种临床环境中继续使用该量表,以进一步推广和验证该量表。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deab/7908233/2c10d155e7ed/ijerph-18-01080-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deab/7908233/2c10d155e7ed/ijerph-18-01080-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deab/7908233/2c10d155e7ed/ijerph-18-01080-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the Korean Version of the Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale: A Methodological Study.护理职业自我效能量表韩文版的验证:一种方法论研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 26;18(3):1080. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031080.
2
[Validity and Reliability of Korean Version of the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale].[韩国版慢性病自我管理效能6项量表的效度与信度]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2021 Oct;51(5):617-629. doi: 10.4040/jkan.21069.
3
[Validity and Reliability of the Peer Group Caring Interaction Scale-Korean Version].[同伴群体关怀互动量表韩语版的效度与信度]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2016 Jun;46(3):431-42. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2016.46.3.431.
4
Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of the Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale.《护理职业自我效能量表》韩文版的心理测量学特性。
J Nurs Res. 2022 Feb 21;30(2):e197. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000481.
5
Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Pulmonary Rehabilitation Adapted Index of Self-Efficacy (PRAISE) for individuals with COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者适用的韩语版肺康复自我效能适应性指数(PRAISE)的心理测量特性。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Aug 29;12:2611-2620. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S142488. eCollection 2017.
6
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale.《整体护理能力量表韩国版的有效性和可靠性》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 13;19(12):7244. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127244.
7
The Korean version of the Virtual Patient Learning System Evaluation Tool: Assessment of reliability and validity.《虚拟患者学习系统评估工具的韩文版:信度和效度评估》。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Nov;106:105093. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105093. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
8
Validation of the resilience scale for nurses (RSN).护士弹性量表(RSN)的验证。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2019 Aug;33(4):434-439. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2018.12.004. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
9
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Coping and Adaptation Processing Scale-Short-Form in Cancer Patients.癌症患者应对与适应处理量表简版韩文版的信效度研究
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2018 Jun;48(3):375-388. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2018.48.3.375.
10
Psychometric Properties of Korean Version of Self-Efficacy of Evidence-Based Practice Scale.《循证实践自我效能量表韩文版的心理测量学特性》
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2016 Sep;10(3):207-212. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the relationship between nurses' professional self-efficacy and parents' perception of family-centered care.探究护士的职业自我效能感与家长对以家庭为中心护理的认知之间的关系。
BMC Nurs. 2025 May 2;24(1):485. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03112-x.
2
[Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Occupational Coping Self-Efficacy Scale for Nurses].[护士职业应对自我效能量表韩文版的效度与信度]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2024 Nov;54(4):633-644. doi: 10.4040/jkan.24094.
3
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the workplace fun scale among nurses: a cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
Swedish Operating Room Nurses and Nurse Anesthetists' Perceptions of Competence and Self-Efficacy.瑞典手术室护士和麻醉护士对能力和自我效能的认知
J Perianesth Nurs. 2019 Aug;34(4):842-850. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2018.09.015. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
2
[Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version Scale of the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher Evaluation Scale (CLES+T)].《临床学习环境、督导及护士教师评价量表(CLES+T)韩文版量表的效度与信度》
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2018 Feb;48(1):70-84. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2018.48.1.70.
3
Perioperative Patient Advocacy: An Integrative Review.
护士工作场所趣味性量表波斯文版的心理测量学特性:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 29;14(1):26041. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77304-x.
4
An Observational Cross-Sectional Study on the Correlation between Professional Competencies and Self-Efficacy in Albanian Registered Nurses.阿尔巴尼亚注册护士专业能力与自我效能感相关性的横断面观察研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 28;11(15):2156. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11152156.
5
Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale-Version 2: A Stepwise Validation with Three Cross-Sectional Data Collections.护理专业自我效能量表-第2版:基于三次横断面数据收集的逐步验证
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 3;11(5):754. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050754.
6
Translation and psychometric evaluation of the persian version of the "Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale".《护理专业自我效能量表》波斯语版本的翻译及心理测量学评估
BMC Nurs. 2023 Jan 25;22(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01182-3.
7
Psychometric Properties of the Albanian Version of the Nursing Self-Efficacy Scale.阿尔巴尼亚语版护理自我效能量表的心理测量学特性
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 8;10(11):2232. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112232.
8
Development and Validation of a Self-Efficacy Scale for Nursing Educators' Role in Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡护理教育者角色自我效能感量表的编制与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 22;18(15):7773. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157773.
围手术期患者支持:一项综合综述。
J Perianesth Nurs. 2016 Oct;31(5):422-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2014.12.001. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
4
Patient empowerment, patient participation and patient-centeredness in hospital care: A concept analysis based on a literature review.医院护理中的患者赋权、患者参与和以患者为中心:基于文献综述的概念分析
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Dec;99(12):1923-1939. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.026. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
5
Development and validation of the Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale.护理专业自我效能量表的编制与验证
Int Nurs Rev. 2016 Sep;63(3):455-64. doi: 10.1111/inr.12291. Epub 2016 Jun 12.
6
The effects of authentic leadership, six areas of worklife, and occupational coping self-efficacy on new graduate nurses' burnout and mental health: A cross-sectional study.真实领导、工作生活六领域和职业应对自我效能对新毕业护士职业倦怠和心理健康的影响:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jun;52(6):1080-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
7
[Validity of instrument development research in korean nursing research].[韩国护理研究中工具开发研究的有效性]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2013 Dec;43(6):697-703. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2013.43.6.697.
8
Development of a pre-service teachers' self-efficacy instrument regarding teacher health education standards.职前教师教师健康教育培训自我效能工具的开发。
J Sch Health. 2013 Oct;83(10):718-27. doi: 10.1111/josh.12086.
9
The nursing profession: public image, self-concept and professional identity. A discussion paper.护理专业:公众形象、自我概念与职业身份。一篇讨论文件。
J Adv Nurs. 2014 Feb;70(2):295-309. doi: 10.1111/jan.12177. Epub 2013 May 26.
10
Sample size and power estimates for a confirmatory factor analytic model in exercise and sport: a Monte Carlo approach.运动与体育领域验证性因子分析模型的样本量和功效估计:蒙特卡罗方法。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2011 Sep;82(3):412-23. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2011.10599773.