• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大数据工具集在药代动力学中的应用:机器学习在事件时间分析中的应用。

Big Data Toolsets to Pharmacometrics: Application of Machine Learning for Time-to-Event Analysis.

机构信息

Division of Quantitative Methods and Modeling, Office of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transl Sci. 2018 May;11(3):305-311. doi: 10.1111/cts.12541. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1111/cts.12541
PMID:29536640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5944589/
Abstract

Additional value can be potentially created by applying big data tools to address pharmacometric problems. The performances of machine learning (ML) methods and the Cox regression model were evaluated based on simulated time-to-event data synthesized under various preset scenarios, i.e., with linear vs. nonlinear and dependent vs. independent predictors in the proportional hazard function, or with high-dimensional data featured by a large number of predictor variables. Our results showed that ML-based methods outperformed the Cox model in prediction performance as assessed by concordance index and in identifying the preset influential variables for high-dimensional data. The prediction performances of ML-based methods are also less sensitive to data size and censoring rates than the Cox regression model. In conclusion, ML-based methods provide a powerful tool for time-to-event analysis, with a built-in capacity for high-dimensional data and better performance when the predictor variables assume nonlinear relationships in the hazard function.

摘要

通过应用大数据工具来解决药物计量学问题,可以创造额外的价值。基于各种预设场景下合成的模拟生存时间数据,评估了机器学习 (ML) 方法和 Cox 回归模型的性能,例如,在比例风险函数中具有线性与非线性以及相依与独立预测因子,或者在具有大量预测变量的高维数据中。我们的研究结果表明,基于 ML 的方法在预测性能(通过一致性指数评估)和识别高维数据中预设的有影响的变量方面优于 Cox 模型。基于 ML 的方法的预测性能对数据量和删失率的敏感性也低于 Cox 回归模型。总之,基于 ML 的方法为生存时间分析提供了一种强大的工具,具有内置的处理高维数据的能力,并且在预测因子在危险函数中呈现非线性关系时具有更好的性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b5a/5944589/a26a5e329b36/CTS-11-305-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b5a/5944589/917eab834b5c/CTS-11-305-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b5a/5944589/ac86569aed91/CTS-11-305-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b5a/5944589/1b7924b7d238/CTS-11-305-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b5a/5944589/a26a5e329b36/CTS-11-305-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b5a/5944589/917eab834b5c/CTS-11-305-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b5a/5944589/ac86569aed91/CTS-11-305-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b5a/5944589/1b7924b7d238/CTS-11-305-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b5a/5944589/a26a5e329b36/CTS-11-305-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Big Data Toolsets to Pharmacometrics: Application of Machine Learning for Time-to-Event Analysis.大数据工具集在药代动力学中的应用:机器学习在事件时间分析中的应用。
Clin Transl Sci. 2018 May;11(3):305-311. doi: 10.1111/cts.12541. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
2
Individual risk prediction: Comparing random forests with Cox proportional-hazards model by a simulation study.个体风险预测:通过模拟研究比较随机森林与 Cox 比例风险模型。
Biom J. 2023 Aug;65(6):e2100380. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202100380. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
3
Survival prediction models: an introduction to discrete-time modeling.生存预测模型:离散时间建模简介。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jul 26;22(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01679-6.
4
Pharmacometrics and Machine Learning Partner to Advance Clinical Data Analysis.药代动力学和机器学习携手推进临床数据分析。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Apr;107(4):926-933. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1774. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
5
Prediction of lung cancer patient survival via supervised machine learning classification techniques.通过监督机器学习分类技术预测肺癌患者的生存情况。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Dec;108:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
6
Impact of censoring on learning Bayesian networks in survival modelling.生存模型中删失数据对贝叶斯网络学习的影响。
Artif Intell Med. 2009 Nov;47(3):199-217. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
7
Deviance residuals-based sparse PLS and sparse kernel PLS regression for censored data.基于偏差残差的稀疏偏最小二乘和稀疏核偏最小二乘回归用于删失数据。
Bioinformatics. 2015 Feb 1;31(3):397-404. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu660. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
8
Spatially varying effects of predictors for the survival prediction of nonmetastatic colorectal Cancer.预测非转移性结直肠癌生存预测的空间变化效应。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Nov 8;18(1):1084. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4985-2.
9
[Comparison of prediction ability of two extended Cox models in nonlinear survival data analysis].[两种扩展Cox模型在非线性生存数据分析中的预测能力比较]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2023 Jan 20;43(1):76-84. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2023.01.10.
10
A big data approach with artificial neural network and molecular similarity for chemical data mining and endocrine disruption prediction.一种结合人工神经网络和分子相似性的大数据方法用于化学数据挖掘和内分泌干扰预测。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2018 Jul-Aug;50(4):169-176. doi: 10.4103/ijp.IJP_304_17.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating Quantitative Methods & Modeling and Analytical Techniques in Reverse Engineering; A Cutting-Edge Strategy in Complex Generic Development.复杂仿制药开发中的前沿策略:逆向工程中定量方法与建模及分析技术的整合
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2025 Mar 26;26(4):92. doi: 10.1208/s12249-025-03067-x.
2
Gender impact on pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PanNEN) prognosis according to survival nomograms.根据生存列线图分析性别对胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(PanNEN)预后的影响。
Endocrine. 2025 Apr;88(1):14-23. doi: 10.1007/s12020-024-04129-z. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
3
Clinical Pharmacology of Cytokine Release Syndrome with T-Cell-Engaging Bispecific Antibodies: Current Insights and Drug Development Strategies.

本文引用的文献

1
Regularization Paths for Cox's Proportional Hazards Model via Coordinate Descent.通过坐标下降法求解Cox比例风险模型的正则化路径
J Stat Softw. 2011 Mar;39(5):1-13. doi: 10.18637/jss.v039.i05.
2
Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search.用深度神经网络和树搜索掌握围棋游戏。
Nature. 2016 Jan 28;529(7587):484-9. doi: 10.1038/nature16961.
3
Developing Exposure/Response Models for Anticancer Drug Treatment: Special Considerations.开发抗癌药物治疗的暴露/反应模型:特殊考量
T细胞衔接双特异性抗体引发的细胞因子释放综合征的临床药理学:当前见解与药物开发策略
Clin Cancer Res. 2025 Jan 17;31(2):245-257. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-2247.
4
Comparing the performance of statistical, machine learning, and deep learning algorithms to predict time-to-event: A simulation study for conversion to mild cognitive impairment.比较统计、机器学习和深度学习算法在预测事件时间方面的性能:转化为轻度认知障碍的模拟研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 22;19(1):e0297190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297190. eCollection 2024.
5
Comparison of sequential and joint nonlinear mixed effects modeling of tumor kinetics and survival following Durvalumab treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma.比较度伐利尤单抗治疗转移性尿路上皮癌患者的肿瘤动力学和生存的序贯和联合非线性混合效应模型。
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2023 Aug;50(4):251-265. doi: 10.1007/s10928-023-09848-w. Epub 2023 Mar 12.
6
Neural Networks for Survival Prediction in Medicine Using Prognostic Factors: A Review and Critical Appraisal.神经网络在医学预后因素预测中的应用:综述与评价。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Sep 30;2022:1176060. doi: 10.1155/2022/1176060. eCollection 2022.
7
Adoption of Machine Learning in Pharmacometrics: An Overview of Recent Implementations and Their Considerations.机器学习在药物计量学中的应用:近期实施情况及其考量概述
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Aug 29;14(9):1814. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14091814.
8
Performance of Cox proportional hazard models on recovering the ground truth of confounded exposure-response relationships for large-molecule oncology drugs.Cox 比例风险模型在恢复大型分子肿瘤药物混杂暴露反应关系的真实情况方面的性能。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2022 Nov;11(11):1511-1526. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12859. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
9
Decoding kinase-adverse event associations for small molecule kinase inhibitors.解码小分子激酶抑制剂的激酶不良反应关联。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jul 27;13(1):4349. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32033-5.
10
A novel analytical framework for risk stratification of real-world data using machine learning: A small cell lung cancer study.一种使用机器学习对真实世界数据进行风险分层的新分析框架:小细胞肺癌研究。
Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Oct;15(10):2437-2447. doi: 10.1111/cts.13371. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2015 Jan;4(1):e00016. doi: 10.1002/psp4.16. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
4
Deep learning.深度学习。
Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44. doi: 10.1038/nature14539.
5
Machine learning applications in genetics and genomics.机器学习在遗传学和基因组学中的应用。
Nat Rev Genet. 2015 Jun;16(6):321-32. doi: 10.1038/nrg3920. Epub 2015 May 7.
6
Estimating a time-dependent concordance index for survival prediction models with covariate dependent censoring.估计具有协变量相关删失的生存预测模型的时依一致性指数。
Stat Med. 2013 Jun 15;32(13):2173-84. doi: 10.1002/sim.5681. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
7
REGULARIZATION FOR COX'S PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL WITH NP-DIMENSIONALITY.具有NP维数的Cox比例风险模型的正则化
Ann Stat. 2011;39(6):3092-3120. doi: 10.1214/11-AOS911.
8
Random forests for genomic data analysis.随机森林在基因组数据分析中的应用。
Genomics. 2012 Jun;99(6):323-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 Apr 21.
9
A comparison of machine learning techniques for survival prediction in breast cancer.机器学习技术在乳腺癌生存预测中的比较。
BioData Min. 2011 May 11;4:12. doi: 10.1186/1756-0381-4-12.
10
Determining factors that predict technique survival on peritoneal dialysis: application of regression and artificial neural network methods.预测腹膜透析技术生存的决定因素:回归和人工神经网络方法的应用。
Nephron Clin Pract. 2011;118(2):c93-c100. doi: 10.1159/000319988. Epub 2010 Dec 8.