Suppr超能文献

正常眼、长眼和短眼前房深度、眼轴长度和人工晶状体度数的 IOLMaster 与超声测量值比较。

Comparison of axial length, anterior chamber depth and intraocular lens power between IOLMaster and ultrasound in normal, long and short eyes.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, P.R. China.

Shanxi Eye Hospital, Shanxi, P.R. China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0194273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194273. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and intraocular lens power (IOLP) of IOLMaster and Ultrasound in normal, long and short eyes.

METHODS

Seventy-four normal eyes (≥ 22 mm and ≤ 25 mm), 74 long eyes (> 25 mm) and 78 short eyes (< 22 mm) underwent AL and ACD measurements with both devices in the order of IOLMaster followed by Ultrasound. The IOLP were calculated using a free online LADAS IOL formula calculator.

RESULTS

The difference in AL and IOLP between IOLMaster and Ultrasound was statistically significant when all three groups were combined. The difference in ACD between IOLMaster and Ultrasound was statistically significant in the normal group (P<0.001) and short eye group (P<0.001) but not the long eye group (P = 0.465). For the IOLP difference between IOLMaster and Ultrasound in the normal group, the percentage of IOLP differences <|0.5|D, ≥|0.5|D<|0.75|D, ≥|0.75|D<|1.0|D, and ≥|1.0|D were 90.5%, 8.1%, 1.4% and 0%, respectively. For the long eye group, they were 90.5%, 5.4%, 4.1% and 0%, respectively. For the short eye group, they were 61.5%, 23.1%, 10.3%, and 5.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

IOLMaster and Ultrasound have statistically significant differences in AL measurements and IOLP (using LADAS formula) for normal, long eye and short eye. The two instruments agree regarding ACD measurements for the long eye group, but differ for the normal and short eye groups. Moreover, the high percentage of IOLP differences greater than |0.5|D in the short eye group is noteworthy.

摘要

目的

比较 IOLMaster 和超声在正常眼、长眼和短眼中的眼轴(AL)、前房深度(ACD)和人工晶状体度数(IOLP)。

方法

74 只正常眼(≥22mm 且 ≤25mm)、74 只长眼(>25mm)和 78 只短眼(<22mm)分别使用 IOLMaster 和超声按 IOLMaster 后超声的顺序进行 AL 和 ACD 测量。使用免费在线 LADAS IOL 公式计算器计算 IOLP。

结果

当所有三组合并时,IOLMaster 和超声在 AL 和 IOLP 方面的差异具有统计学意义。当所有三组合并时,IOLMaster 和超声在 ACD 方面的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001),但在长眼组中无统计学意义(P=0.465)。在正常眼组中,IOLMaster 和 Ultrasound 之间的 IOLP 差值<|0.5|D、≥|0.5|D<|0.75|D、≥|0.75|D<|1.0|D 和≥|1.0|D 的 IOLP 差值百分比分别为 90.5%、8.1%、1.4%和 0%。在长眼组中,这些百分比分别为 90.5%、5.4%、4.1%和 0%。在短眼组中,这些百分比分别为 61.5%、23.1%、10.3%和 5.1%。

结论

IOLMaster 和超声在正常眼、长眼和短眼中的 AL 测量和 IOLP(使用 LADAS 公式)存在统计学差异。对于长眼组,这两种仪器在 ACD 测量方面是一致的,但在正常眼组和短眼组中存在差异。此外,短眼组中 IOLP 差值大于|0.5|D 的比例很高,值得注意。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d1/5854401/4aba77a6e08a/pone.0194273.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验