Hegarty Lynda M, Mair Jacqueline L, Kirby Karen, Murtagh Elaine, Murphy Marie H
School of Sport, Ulster University, Jordanstown, Northern Ireland.
Sport and Exercise Sciences Research Institute, Ulster University, Jordanstown, Northern Ireland.
AIMS Public Health. 2016 Aug 5;3(3):520-541. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.3.520. eCollection 2016.
Prolonged, uninterrupted periods of sedentary time may be associated with increased risk of Type II diabetes, cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality even if the minimum recommended levels of daily physical activity are achieved. It is reported that children spend approximately 80% of their day engaged in sedentary behaviours. Since children spend a large portion of their waking time at school, school-based interventions targeting excessive or interrupted periods of sedentary time have been investigated in a number of studies. However, results of the effectiveness of studies to-date have been inconsistent.
To conduct a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of school-based interventions designed to reduce sedentary behaviour on objectively measured sedentary time in children.
Five electronic databases were searched to retrieve peer-reviewed studies published in English up to and including August 2015. Studies that reported objectively measured sedentary time before and after a school-based intervention to reduce sedentary time were included in the review. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration method.
Our search identified eleven papers reporting eight interventions. Studies focused on the physical environment, the curriculum, individual in-class activities, homework activities or a combination of these strategies. Three studies reported decreases in sedentary time following intervention. Study follow-up periods ranged from immediately post-intervention to 12 months. None of the studies were judged to have a low risk of bias.
Multicomponent interventions which also include the use of standing desks may be an effective method for reducing children's sedentary time in a school-based intervention. However, longer term trials are needed to determine the sustained effectiveness of such interventions on children's sedentary time.
即使达到了每日建议的最低体育活动水平,长时间不间断的久坐时间也可能与II型糖尿病、心血管疾病和全因死亡率的风险增加有关。据报道,儿童一天中约80%的时间都处于久坐行为中。由于儿童醒着的大部分时间都在学校,因此多项研究对以学校为基础、针对过长或间断的久坐时间的干预措施进行了调查。然而,迄今为止,这些研究的有效性结果并不一致。
进行一项系统评价,以评估旨在减少儿童久坐行为的以学校为基础的干预措施对客观测量的久坐时间的有效性。
检索了五个电子数据库,以获取截至2015年8月(含8月)发表的英文同行评审研究。纳入综述的研究报告了以学校为基础的减少久坐时间干预措施前后客观测量的久坐时间。使用Cochrane协作方法评估偏倚风险。
我们的检索确定了11篇报告8项干预措施的论文。研究重点关注物理环境、课程、课堂内个体活动、家庭作业活动或这些策略的组合。三项研究报告干预后久坐时间减少。研究随访期从干预后立即开始至12个月。没有一项研究被判定为低偏倚风险。
在以学校为基础的干预措施中,包括使用站立式办公桌的多成分干预措施可能是减少儿童久坐时间的有效方法。然而,需要进行长期试验来确定此类干预措施对儿童久坐时间的持续有效性。