Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Cancer Control, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 May 21;21(6):784-791. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty042.
The demand for alternative nicotine/tobacco products is not well established. This paper uses a behavioral economic approach to test whether smokers have differential demand for conventional factory-made, electronic, and very low nicotine content cigarettes (FMCs/ECs/VLNCs) and uses the prospective cohort design to test the predictive validity of demand indices on subsequent use of commercially available FMCs and ECs.
Daily smokers (≥16 years) from the Netherlands completed an online survey in April 2014 (N = 1215). Purchase tasks were completed for FMCs, ECs, and VLNCs. Participants indicated the number of cigarettes they would consume in 24 h, across a range of prices (0-30 euro). The relationship between consumption and price was quantified into four indices of demand (intensity, Pmax, breakpoint, and essential value). A follow-up survey in July 2015 measured FMC and EC use.
At baseline, greater demand was observed for FMCs relative to ECs and VLNCs across all demand indices, with no difference between ECs and VLNCs. At follow-up, greater baseline FMC demand (intensity, essential value) was associated with lower quit rates and higher relapse. EC demand (Pmax, breakpoint, essential value) was positively associated with any EC use between survey waves, past 30 day EC use, and EC purchase between waves.
Smokers valued FMCs more than ECs or VLNCs, and FMCs were less sensitive to price increases. Demand indices predicted use of commercially available products over a 15 month period. To serve as viable substitutes for FMCs, ECs and VLNCs will need to be priced lower than FMCs.
Purchase tasks can be adapted for novel nicotine/tobacco products as a means to efficiently quantify demand and predict use. Among current daily smokers, the demand for ECs and VLNCs is lower than FMCs.
替代尼古丁/烟草产品的需求尚未得到充分证实。本文采用行为经济学方法来检验吸烟者对传统工厂制造、电子和极低尼古丁含量香烟(FMC/EC/VLNC)是否存在不同的需求,并采用前瞻性队列设计来检验需求指标对随后使用市售 FMC 和 EC 的预测有效性。
2014 年 4 月,来自荷兰的成年吸烟者(≥16 岁)完成了一项在线调查(N=1215)。完成了 FMC、EC 和 VLNC 的购买任务。参与者表明他们在 24 小时内会消费多少支香烟,价格范围为 0-30 欧元。消费与价格之间的关系被量化为四个需求指数(强度、Pmax、断点和基本值)。2015 年 7 月的一项后续调查测量了 FMC 和 EC 的使用情况。
在基线时,与 EC 和 VLNC 相比,所有需求指数都观察到对 FMC 的需求更大,而 EC 和 VLNC 之间没有差异。在随访时,更高的基线 FMC 需求(强度、基本值)与更低的戒烟率和更高的复吸率相关。EC 需求(Pmax、断点、基本值)与调查波之间、过去 30 天 EC 使用以及波之间 EC 购买的任何 EC 使用呈正相关。
吸烟者对 FMC 的评价高于 EC 或 VLNC,并且 FMC 对价格上涨的敏感度较低。需求指数预测了在 15 个月的时间内使用市售产品的情况。为了成为 FMC 的可行替代品,EC 和 VLNC 的价格需要低于 FMC。
购买任务可以适用于新型尼古丁/烟草产品,以有效量化需求并预测使用情况。在当前的成年吸烟者中,对 EC 和 VLNC 的需求低于 FMC。