Maniar Rajesh N, Maniar Parul R, Singhi Tushar, Gangaraju Bharat Kumar
Department of Orthopedics, Lilavati Hospital and Research Center, Mumbai, India.
Department of Ophthalmology, The Nook Clinic, Mumbai, India.
Clin Orthop Surg. 2018 Mar;10(1):26-32. doi: 10.4055/cios.2018.10.1.26. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
No study in the literature has compared early functional recovery following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the obese with the nonobese using World Health Organization (WHO) classes of obesity. Our aim was to compare functional scores and flexion post-TKA in each class of obesity as per WHO classification against a matched control group of nonobese patients.
Records of 885 consecutive primary TKA patients (919 knees) operated by a single surgeon were reviewed. The first 35 knees in each class I, class II and class III obesity group during the study period were then matched with a similar number of knees in nonobese TKA patients during the same period. Functional scores recorded pre- and postoperatively at 3 months and 1 year were Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) score, and Knee Society Score (KSS).
There was no difference in any parameter between the class I obese and matched nonobese at any assessment point. In the class II obese, as compared to the nonobese, there was no difference in any parameter preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. However, 1 year postoperatively, the SF-12 physical subscore was lower in the class II obese than the nonobese (44.7 vs. 48.6, = 0.047) and the WOMAC score was significantly higher (15.8 vs. 9.7, = 0.04). In the class III obese, the WOMAC score was significantly higher than the nonobese (58.1 vs. 44.3, < 0.001 preoperatively; 15.7 vs. 8.1, = 0.005 at 1 year) and KSS was significantly lower (83.5 vs. 96.5, = 0.049 preoperatively; 172 vs. 185; = 0.003 at 1 year). Knee flexion was significantly lower in the class III obese than the nonobese (95 vs. 113; < 0.001 preoperatively; 120 vs. 127; = 0.002 at 1 year).
The class I obese can expect good early and late functional recovery as the nonobese. The class II obese can expect comparable early functional recovery as the nonobese but their late function may be lesser. The class III obese would have poorer functional scores and lesser knee flexion postoperatively compared to the nonobese. However, compared to their own preoperative status, there is definite improvement in function and knee flexion.
文献中尚无研究使用世界卫生组织(WHO)的肥胖分类标准,对肥胖患者与非肥胖患者全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的早期功能恢复情况进行比较。我们的目的是根据WHO分类标准,比较各肥胖等级患者TKA后的功能评分和膝关节屈曲度,并与相匹配的非肥胖患者对照组进行对比。
回顾了由同一位外科医生实施手术的885例连续原发性TKA患者(919个膝关节)的记录。然后,将研究期间I类、II类和III类肥胖组中的前35个膝关节,与同期非肥胖TKA患者中数量相似的膝关节进行匹配。术前、术后3个月和1年记录的功能评分包括西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)、简短健康调查问卷(SF - 12)评分以及膝关节协会评分(KSS)。
在任何评估点,I类肥胖患者与相匹配的非肥胖患者之间的任何参数均无差异。在II类肥胖患者中,与非肥胖患者相比,术前和术后3个月的任何参数均无差异。然而,术后1年,II类肥胖患者的SF - 12身体维度评分低于非肥胖患者(44.7对48.6,P = 0.047),且WOMAC评分显著更高(15.8对9.7,P = 0.04)。在III类肥胖患者中,WOMAC评分显著高于非肥胖患者(术前:58.1对44.3,P < 0.001;1年时:15.7对8.1,P = 0.005),KSS显著更低(术前:83.5对96.5,P = 0.049;1年时:172对185,P = 0.003)。III类肥胖患者的膝关节屈曲度显著低于非肥胖患者(术前:95对113,P < 0.001;1年时:120对127,P = 0.002)。
I类肥胖患者可预期与非肥胖患者一样获得良好的早期和晚期功能恢复。II类肥胖患者可预期与非肥胖患者有相当的早期功能恢复,但晚期功能可能较差。与非肥胖患者相比,III类肥胖患者术后的功能评分更差,膝关节屈曲度更小。然而,与他们自身的术前状态相比,功能和膝关节屈曲度有明显改善。