• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烧伤瘢痕患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)的 Rasch 分析。

Rasch analysis of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) in burn scars.

机构信息

Association of Dutch Burn Centers, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2012 Feb;21(1):13-23. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9924-5. Epub 2011 May 20.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-011-9924-5
PMID:21598065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3254877/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) is a questionnaire that was developed to assess scar quality. It consists of two separate six-item scales (Observer Scale and Patient Scale), both of which are scored on a 10-point rating scale. After many years of experience with this scale in burn scar assessment, it is appropriate to examine its psychometric properties using Rasch analysis.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data collection from seven clinical trials resulted in a data set of 1,629 observer scores and 1,427 patient scores of burn scars. We examined the person-item map, item fit statistics, reliability, response category ordering, and dimensionality of the POSAS.

RESULTS

The POSAS showed an adequate fit to the Rasch model, except for the item surface area. Person reliability of the Observer Scale and Patient Scale was 0.82 and 0.77, respectively. Dimensionality analysis revealed that the unexplained variance by the first contrast of both scales was 1.7 units. Spearman correlation between the Observer Scale Rasch measure and the overall opinion of the clinician was 0.75.

CONCLUSION

The Rasch model demonstrated that the POSAS is a reliable and valid scale that measures the single-construct scar quality.

摘要

目的

患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)是一种用于评估瘢痕质量的问卷。它由两个独立的六分量表(观察者量表和患者量表)组成,两者均采用 10 分制评分。在烧伤瘢痕评估中使用该量表多年后,使用 Rasch 分析检查其心理计量学特性是恰当的。

方法

来自 7 项临床试验的横断面数据收集产生了 1629 份观察者评分和 1427 份患者评分的烧伤瘢痕数据集。我们检查了 POSAS 的个体-项目映射、项目拟合统计、可靠性、反应类别排序和维度。

结果

POSAS 与 Rasch 模型拟合良好,但表面积项目除外。观察者量表和患者量表的个体可靠性分别为 0.82 和 0.77。维度分析显示,两个量表的第一个对比解释的方差为 1.7 个单位。观察者量表 Rasch 测量值与临床医生整体意见的斯皮尔曼相关性为 0.75。

结论

Rasch 模型表明,POSAS 是一种可靠和有效的量表,可测量单一结构的瘢痕质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/714f/3254877/17c578f276df/11136_2011_9924_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/714f/3254877/0221bffa76dd/11136_2011_9924_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/714f/3254877/9024a096b61c/11136_2011_9924_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/714f/3254877/af165385438c/11136_2011_9924_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/714f/3254877/d61414898de8/11136_2011_9924_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/714f/3254877/17c578f276df/11136_2011_9924_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/714f/3254877/0221bffa76dd/11136_2011_9924_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/714f/3254877/9024a096b61c/11136_2011_9924_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/714f/3254877/af165385438c/11136_2011_9924_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/714f/3254877/d61414898de8/11136_2011_9924_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/714f/3254877/17c578f276df/11136_2011_9924_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Rasch analysis of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) in burn scars.烧伤瘢痕患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)的 Rasch 分析。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Feb;21(1):13-23. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9924-5. Epub 2011 May 20.
2
Rasch Analysis of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in Linear Scars: Suggestions for a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale v2.1.线性瘢痕患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表的 Rasch 分析:患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表 v2.1 的建议。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Dec;144(6):1073e-1079e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006265.
3
Differential item functioning in the Observer Scale of the POSAS for different scar types.不同瘢痕类型在POSAS观察者量表中的项目功能差异。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Sep;23(7):2037-45. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0637-4. Epub 2014 Feb 9.
4
Predictive validity of short term scar quality on final burn scar outcome using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in patients with minor to moderate burn severity.使用患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表,评估轻度至中度烧伤严重程度患者短期瘢痕质量对最终烧伤瘢痕结局的预测效度。
Burns. 2017 Jun;43(4):715-723. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.10.012. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
5
Psychometric Findings for the SCAR-Q Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Based on 731 Children and Adults with Surgical, Traumatic, and Burn Scars from Four Countries.基于来自四个国家的 731 名接受过手术、创伤和烧伤治疗的儿童和成人患者的 SCAR-Q 患者报告结局测量的心理计量学研究结果。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Sep;146(3):331e-338e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007078.
6
Patterns and predictors of burn scar outcome in the first 12 months after burn: The patient's perspective.烧伤后 12 个月内烧伤瘢痕结局的模式和预测因素:患者视角。
Burns. 2019 Sep;45(6):1283-1290. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.03.025. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
7
Patient-reported scar quality of adults after burn injuries: A five-year multicenter follow-up study.成人烧伤后患者报告的瘢痕质量:一项为期五年的多中心随访研究。
Wound Repair Regen. 2019 Jul;27(4):406-414. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12709. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
8
The minimal important change (MIC) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) 2.0.患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)2.0 的最小重要变化(MIC)和最小临床重要差异(MCID)。
Burns. 2024 Nov;50(8):2070-2076. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.05.022. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
9
Patient-and observer-reported long-term scar quality of wide local excision scars in melanoma patients.患者及观察者报告的黑色素瘤患者广泛局部切除瘢痕的长期瘢痕质量
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2018 Dec;52(6):319-324. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2018.1493388. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
10
The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation.患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表:一种用于瘢痕评估的可靠且可行的工具。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jun;113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56.

引用本文的文献

1
Therapeutic role of mesenchymal stem cells in second-degree burn wound repair: Integration with split-thickness skin grafts.间充质干细胞在二度烧伤创面修复中的治疗作用:与中厚皮片移植相结合
Scars Burn Heal. 2025 Jul 23;11:20595131251357442. doi: 10.1177/20595131251357442. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Hand Function Recovers to Near Normal in Patients with Deep Dermal Hand Burns Treated with Enzymatic Debridement: A Prospective Cohort Study.酶清创治疗的手部深度真皮烧伤患者手部功能恢复至接近正常:一项前瞻性队列研究
Eur Burn J. 2025 Jun 12;6(2):36. doi: 10.3390/ebj6020036.
3
Effect of CO₂ fractional laser intervention versus hyaluronidase injection in early scar treatment: a randomized controlled study.

本文引用的文献

1
Topical silicone gel versus placebo in promoting the maturation of burn scars: a randomized controlled trial.硅酮凝胶局部治疗与安慰剂治疗促进烧伤瘢痕成熟的随机对照试验。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Aug;126(2):524-531. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181e09559.
2
Objective scar assessment--a new method using standardized digital imaging and spectral modelling.客观瘢痕评估——一种使用标准化数字成像和光谱建模的新方法。
Burns. 2011 Feb;37(1):74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.03.008. Epub 2010 May 26.
3
Burn scar assessment: A systematic review of objective scar assessment tools.
二氧化碳分次激光干预与透明质酸酶注射在早期瘢痕治疗中的效果:一项随机对照研究。
Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Jun 19;40(1):289. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04538-0.
4
Co-design of an outcome measure for hand burn injuries.手部烧伤损伤结局指标的联合设计
Br J Occup Ther. 2025 Feb;88(2):116-128. doi: 10.1177/03080226241288162. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
5
Comparative study of chitosan-based liquid dressing and recombinant human epidermal growth factor on acute limb skin wound healing: A randomized controlled trial.壳聚糖基液体敷料与重组人表皮生长因子对急性肢体皮肤伤口愈合的比较研究:一项随机对照试验。
JPRAS Open. 2025 Mar 26;44:379-389. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2025.03.018. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Development of the Observer Scales of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale: An International Delphi Study.患者及观察者瘢痕评估量表的观察者量表开发:一项国际德尔菲研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Feb 28;13(2):e6416. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006416. eCollection 2025 Feb.
7
Psychometric validation of the 20-item K-DOCS in Chinese adolescents: a multi-method approach.20项中文青少年K-DOCS的心理测量学验证:一种多方法途径
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 10;15(1):4875. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88980-8.
8
Burn hypertrophy scarring assessment based on patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS).基于患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)的烧伤增生性瘢痕评估
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2024 Dec 31;37(4):312-316. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
Measurement Equivalence and Feasibility of the Electronic and Paper Versions of the POSAS, EQ-5D, and DLQI: A Randomized Crossover Trial.POSAS、EQ-5D和DLQI电子版本与纸质版本的测量等效性及可行性:一项随机交叉试验
Eur Burn J. 2024 Oct 11;5(4):321-334. doi: 10.3390/ebj5040030.
10
Utility and Outcomes of a Keystone Perforator Island Flap for Reconstruction at Various Anatomical Locations: A Prospective Study.用于不同解剖部位重建的关键穿支岛状皮瓣的效用及结果:一项前瞻性研究。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 16;16(10):e71644. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71644. eCollection 2024 Oct.
烧伤瘢痕评估:客观瘢痕评估工具的系统评价。
Burns. 2010 Dec;36(8):1157-64. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.03.016. Epub 2010 May 21.
4
Use of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale for evaluation of facial scars treated with self-drying silicone gel.使用患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表评估自干性硅胶凝胶治疗的面部瘢痕。
J Craniofac Surg. 2010 May;21(3):719-23. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181d841af.
5
Developing preference-based health measures: using Rasch analysis to generate health state values.制定基于偏好的健康测量方法:运用 Rasch 分析生成健康状态值。
Qual Life Res. 2010 Aug;19(6):907-17. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9646-0. Epub 2010 May 8.
6
The Work Instability Scale for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA-WIS): Does it work in osteoarthritis?类风湿关节炎工作不稳定性量表(RA-WIS):它在骨关节炎中有用吗?
Qual Life Res. 2010 Sep;19(7):1057-68. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9656-y. Epub 2010 Apr 25.
7
Cosmetic outcomes of various skin closure methods following cesarean delivery: a randomized trial.剖宫产术后不同皮肤缝合方法的美容效果:一项随机试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jul;203(1):36.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
8
Rasch analysis of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale MSIS-29.多发性硬化症影响量表MSIS - 29的拉施分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Jun 22;7:58. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-58.
9
Current scales for assessing human scarring: a review.当前评估人类瘢痕形成的量表:综述
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 Jun;62(6):713-20. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.01.080. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
10
Rasch analysis of 24-, 18- and 11-item versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷24项、18项和11项版本的拉施分析。
Qual Life Res. 2009 May;18(4):473-81. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9456-4. Epub 2009 Feb 24.