• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在安全网诊所中进行结直肠癌筛查计划的成本效益分析。

A cost-effectiveness analysis of a colorectal cancer screening program in safety net clinics.

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227, USA.

Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2019 Mar;120:119-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.01.014
PMID:30685318
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6392039/
Abstract

STOP CRC is a cluster-randomized pragmatic study of a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program within eight federally-qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Oregon and California promoting fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) with appropriate colonoscopy follow-up. Results are presented of a cost-effectiveness analysis of STOP CRC. Organization staff completed activity-based costing spreadsheets, assigning labor hours by intervention activity and job-specific wage rates. Non-labor costs were from study data. Data were collected over February 2014-February 2016; analyses were performed in 2016-2017. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) using completed FITs adjusted for number of screening-eligible patients (SEPs), as the effectiveness measure were calculated overall and by organization. Intervention delivery costs totaled $305 K across eight organizations (range: $10.2 K-$110 K). Overall delivery cost per SEP was $14.43 (range: $10.37-$19.10). The largest cost category across organizations was implementation, specifically mailing preparation. The overall ICER was $483 per SEP-adjusted completed FIT (range: $96-$1021 among organizations with positive effectiveness). Lagged data accounting for implementation delay produced comparable results. The costs of colonoscopies following abnormal FITs decreased the overall ICER to S409 because usual care clinics generated more such colonoscopies than intervention clinics. Using lagged data, follow-up colonoscopies increase the ICER by 4.3% to $460. Results indicate the complex implications for cost-effectiveness of implementing standard CRC screening within a pragmatic setting involving FQHCs with varied patient populations, clinical structures, and resources. Performance variation across organizations emphasizes the need for future evaluations that inform the introduction of efficient CRC screening to underserved populations.

摘要

STOP CRC 是一项在俄勒冈州和加利福尼亚州的 8 家联邦合格健康中心(FQHC)中进行的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查项目的集群随机实用研究,该项目旨在通过适当的结肠镜检查来推广粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)。本文呈现了 STOP CRC 的成本效益分析结果。组织工作人员完成了基于活动的成本核算电子表格,根据干预活动和特定工作的工资率分配劳动时间。非劳动成本来自研究数据。数据收集于 2014 年 2 月至 2016 年 2 月;分析于 2016 年至 2017 年进行。使用经过调整的已完成 FIT 数量作为有效性指标,计算了总体和组织层面的增量成本效益比(ICER)。八项组织的干预措施实施总成本为 305 万美元(范围:10.2 万美元至 110 万美元)。每位符合筛查条件的患者(SEP)的实施成本为 14.43 美元(范围:10.37 美元至 19.10 美元)。组织间最大的成本类别是实施,特别是邮件准备。经过调整的每个 SEP 完成 FIT 的总体 ICER 为 483 美元(范围:组织间的 96 美元至 1021 美元)。考虑实施延迟的滞后数据产生了类似的结果。异常 FIT 后续结肠镜检查的成本降低了总体 ICER 至 409 美元,因为常规护理诊所比干预诊所产生了更多此类结肠镜检查。使用滞后数据,后续结肠镜检查使 ICER 增加了 4.3%,达到 460 美元。结果表明,在涉及具有不同患者群体、临床结构和资源的 FQHC 的实用环境中实施标准 CRC 筛查对成本效益的复杂影响。组织间的绩效差异强调了需要进行未来评估,以便为服务不足的人群引入有效的 CRC 筛查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a460/6392039/3c3ca01dc730/nihms-1519786-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a460/6392039/3c3ca01dc730/nihms-1519786-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a460/6392039/3c3ca01dc730/nihms-1519786-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
A cost-effectiveness analysis of a colorectal cancer screening program in safety net clinics.在安全网诊所中进行结直肠癌筛查计划的成本效益分析。
Prev Med. 2019 Mar;120:119-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
2
Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations: design of a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial.优先人群中预防结肠癌的策略与机遇:一项整群随机实用试验的设计
Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jul;38(2):344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
3
Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.社区健康诊所中邮寄式结直肠癌筛查推广项目的效果:STOP CRC 整群随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Sep 1;178(9):1174-1181. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3629.
4
Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.结直肠癌混合筛查策略的健康获益和成本效益。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Sep;11(9):1158-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
5
Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics.将计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)方法应用于一项涉及安全网诊所的大型实用性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 19;17(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2364-3.
6
Screening for Colorectal Cancer With Fecal Immunochemical Testing With and Without Postpolypectomy Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.粪便免疫化学检测联合或不联合息肉切除术后监测结肠镜检查用于结直肠癌筛查的成本效果分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Oct 17;167(8):544-554. doi: 10.7326/M16-2891. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
7
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.在中低收入国家进行结直肠癌筛查的成本效益和预算影响分析:来自泰国的例子。
J Med Econ. 2019 Dec;22(12):1351-1361. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1674065. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
8
Effectiveness and cost of multilayered colorectal cancer screening promotion interventions at federally qualified health centers in Washington State.华盛顿州联邦合格健康中心实施的多层结直肠癌筛查推广干预措施的效果和成本。
Cancer. 2018 Nov 1;124(21):4121-4129. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31693. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
9
Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Mailed FIT in a Safety Net Clinic Population.邮寄粪便免疫化学检测在一个医疗保障人群中的效果和成本效益。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Nov;36(11):3441-3447. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06691-y. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of single colonoscopy versus single fecal test for colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment.结肠镜单一检查与粪便检测单一检查在结直肠癌诊断和治疗中的成本效益分析。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Jul;39(7):1328-1335. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16509. Epub 2024 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Costs and Projected Effect of a Federally Qualified Health Center-Based Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Texas.得克萨斯州基于合格联邦健康中心的邮寄结直肠癌筛查计划的成本和预期效果。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2024 May 2;21:E30. doi: 10.5888/pcd21.230266.
2
Colorectal Cancer Screening After Sequential Outreach Components in a Demographically Diverse Cohort.在人口统计学上多样化的队列中进行序贯外展后对结直肠癌的筛查。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e245295. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.5295.
3
Cost-effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus Self-collection Intervention on Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake among Underscreened U.S. Persons with a Cervix.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.社区健康诊所中邮寄式结直肠癌筛查推广项目的效果:STOP CRC 整群随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Sep 1;178(9):1174-1181. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3629.
2
Barriers and Facilitators to Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Rural Women in Community Clinics by Heath Literacy.基于健康素养的社区诊所农村女性结直肠癌筛查的障碍与促进因素
J Womens Health Issues Care. 2017;6(6). doi: 10.4172/2325-9795.1000292. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
3
A Quality Improvement Initiative to Increase Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening: Collaboration between a Primary Care Clinic and Research Team.
人乳头瘤病毒自我采集干预对美国未接受宫颈癌筛查人群宫颈癌筛查参与度的成本效益分析。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Aug 1;32(8):1097-1106. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-1267.
4
Equitable Implementation of Mailed Stool Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening and Patient Navigation in a Safety Net Health System.在一个安全网健康系统中,公平实施邮寄粪便潜血试验筛查结直肠癌和患者导航。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(7):1631-1637. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07952-0. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
5
Colorectal cancer surveillance by colonoscopy in a prospective, population-based long-term Swiss screening study - outcomes, adherence, and costs.结肠镜检查在瑞士前瞻性、基于人群的长期筛查研究中的结直肠癌监测——结果、依从性和成本。
Z Gastroenterol. 2022 May;60(5):761-778. doi: 10.1055/a-1796-2471. Epub 2022 May 11.
6
Source matters: a survey of cost variation for fecal immunochemical tests in primary care.来源很重要:初级保健中粪便免疫化学检测成本差异的调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 15;22(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07576-4.
7
Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Mailed FIT in a Safety Net Clinic Population.邮寄粪便免疫化学检测在一个医疗保障人群中的效果和成本效益。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Nov;36(11):3441-3447. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06691-y. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
8
Comparative cost-effectiveness of mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT)-based interventions for increasing colorectal cancer screening in the Medicaid population.邮寄粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)为基础的干预措施在医疗补助人群中提高结直肠癌筛查的成本效益比较。
Cancer. 2020 Sep 15;126(18):4197-4208. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32992. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
9
Economic Evaluation of Tailored Web versus Tailored Telephone-Based Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening among Women.基于网络的个体化干预与基于电话的个体化干预增加女性结直肠癌筛查的经济学评价
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Mar;13(3):309-316. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-19-0376. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
10
Patient randomized trial of a targeted navigation program to improve rates of follow-up colonoscopy in community health centers.患者随机临床试验,旨在通过目标导航程序提高社区卫生中心随访结肠镜检查的比例。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Feb;89:105920. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105920. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
一项旨在提高结直肠癌(CRC)筛查率的质量改进计划:初级保健诊所与研究团队之间的合作。
J Fam Med. 2017;4(3). doi: 10.26420/jfammed.2017.1115. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
4
Cancer statistics, 2018.癌症统计数据,2018 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
5
Cost Effectiveness of Age-Specific Screening Intervals for People With Family Histories of Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌家族史人群特定年龄筛查间隔的成本效益
Gastroenterology. 2018 Jan;154(1):105-116.e20. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.021. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
6
A centralized mailed program with stepped increases of support increases time in compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines over 5 years: A randomized trial.一项为期5年的随机试验表明,一个支持力度逐步增加的集中式邮寄项目可提高结直肠癌筛查指南的依从性。
Cancer. 2017 Nov 15;123(22):4472-4480. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30908. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
7
Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics.将计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)方法应用于一项涉及安全网诊所的大型实用性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 19;17(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2364-3.
8
Time-driven activity-based costing in health care: A systematic review of the literature.医疗保健中的时间驱动作业成本法:文献系统评价。
Health Policy. 2017 Jul;121(7):755-763. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 May 10.
9
A Checklist for the Conduct, Reporting, and Appraisal of Microcosting Studies in Health Care: Protocol Development.医疗保健微观成本核算研究的实施、报告与评估清单:方案制定
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Oct 5;5(4):e195. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6263.
10
The validation of electronic health records in accurately identifying patients eligible for colorectal cancer screening in safety net clinics.电子健康记录在安全网诊所中准确识别符合结直肠癌筛查条件患者方面的验证。
Fam Pract. 2016 Dec;33(6):639-643. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw065. Epub 2016 Jul 28.