Campbell-Lee Sally A, Gvozdjan Kristina, Choi K Mia, Chen Yi-Fan, Saraf Santosh L, Hsu Lewis L, Gordeuk Victor R, Strauss Ronald G, Triulzi Darrell J
Department of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Sickle Cell Center, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Transfusion. 2018 Jul;58(7):1588-1596. doi: 10.1111/trf.14588. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
Prevention of red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) focuses on phenotypic RBC matching. We assessed alloimmunization among transfused patients with SCD after implementing leukoreduction and prophylactic antigen matching (PAM).
Retrospective review of transfusion and medical records for SCD patients 18 months to 81 years of age was performed covering two 5-year periods: Period 1, no PAM, occasional leukoreduction, and Period 2, consistent leukoreduction and extended PAM (Rh, Kell, S, Fy, Jk) for patients already alloimmunized. Patients transfused in Period 1 were excluded from Period 2.
A total of 293 patients were transfused in Period 1 and 183 in Period 2. Median time between first sample and last type and screen after transfusion was 2.12 years in Period 1 and 1.03 years in Period 2. Initial alloimmunization prevalence was lower in Period 2 (26.2%) versus Period 1 (37.5%) and after subsequent transfusions in Period 2 (23.8%) versus Period 1 (45.7%), although without significant difference after adjusting for number of units transfused, percentage of leukoreduced RBCs, sex, and age. Alloimmunized patients received more nonleukoreduced RBCs in Period 1 than nonalloimmunized. Patients transfused during inflammatory conditions were not significantly more likely to become alloimmunized.
The prevalence of initial and subsequent RBC alloimmunization in Period 2 was lower than that in Period 1; however, overall prevalence remained high. We recommend leukoreduced, hemoglobin S-negative Rh and Kell PAM RBCs for transfusion of patients with SCD. Component and recipient factors affecting alloimmunization should be studied further.
镰状细胞病(SCD)患者红细胞(RBC)同种免疫的预防重点在于表型RBC匹配。我们评估了实施白细胞滤除和预防性抗原匹配(PAM)后SCD输血患者的同种免疫情况。
对18个月至81岁SCD患者的输血和病历进行回顾性分析,涵盖两个5年时间段:第1阶段,无PAM,偶尔进行白细胞滤除;第2阶段,对已发生同种免疫的患者持续进行白细胞滤除并扩大PAM(Rh、Kell、S、Fy、Jk)。第1阶段输血的患者被排除在第2阶段之外。
第1阶段共293例患者接受输血,第2阶段为183例。第1阶段输血后首次采样与最后一次血型筛查之间的中位时间为2.12年,第2阶段为1.03年。第2阶段初始同种免疫患病率低于第1阶段(26.2%对37.5%),第2阶段后续输血后也低于第1阶段(23.8%对45.7%),尽管在调整输血量、白细胞滤除RBC的百分比、性别和年龄后无显著差异。第1阶段中,同种免疫患者比未同种免疫患者接受了更多未进行白细胞滤除的RBC。在炎症状态下输血的患者发生同种免疫的可能性并无显著增加。
第2阶段初始和后续RBC同种免疫的患病率低于第1阶段;然而,总体患病率仍然较高。我们建议为SCD患者输注经过白细胞滤除、血红蛋白S阴性的Rh和Kell PAM RBC。应进一步研究影响同种免疫的成分和受者因素。