Kacker Seema, Ness Paul M, Savage William J, Frick Kevin D, Shirey R Sue, King Karen E, Tobian Aaron A R
Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Transfusion. 2014 Aug;54(8):2034-44. doi: 10.1111/trf.12585. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
Prophylactic antigen-matching can reduce alloimmunization rates among chronically transfused patients with sickle cell disease (SCD), but this matching increases costs and may only benefit 30% of patients. We assessed the clinical and financial value of a potential assay for alloimmunization risk that would allow for targeted antigen-matching.
A Markov-based model evaluated direct medical costs and alloimmunization events over 10 to 20 years among transfused (simple or exchange) patients with SCD. Four matching strategies were evaluated: prospective matching (for all patients), history-based matching (only for patients with prior alloimmunization), perfectly informed matching (assay with 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity), and imperfectly informed matching (reduced accuracy). Under all matching protocols, matching included C, E, K, and any additional alloantibodies present. A hospital perspective was adopted, with costs (2012US$) and events discounted (3%).
Perfectly informed antigen-matching using a $1000 assay is expected to save $82,334 per patient over 10 years, compared to prospective matching. Perfectly informed antigen-matching is more costly than history-based matching, but reduces alloimmunization events by 45.6% over 10 years. Averting each alloimmunization event using this strategy would cost an additional $10,934 per patient. Imperfectly informed antigen-matching using an assay with 75% specificity and 75% sensitivity is less costly than prospective matching, but increases alloimmunization events. Compared to history-based matching, imperfectly informed matching would decrease alloimmunization events by 32.61%, at an additional cost of $147,915 per patient over 10 years. Cost-effectiveness of informed antigen-matching is largely driven by assay specificity.
A sufficiently specific assay to inform antigen-matching may be cost-effective in reducing alloimmunization among transfused patients with SCD.
预防性抗原匹配可降低镰状细胞病(SCD)慢性输血患者的同种免疫率,但这种匹配会增加成本,且可能仅使30%的患者受益。我们评估了一种潜在的同种免疫风险检测方法的临床和经济价值,该方法可实现靶向抗原匹配。
基于马尔可夫模型评估了SCD输血患者(简单输血或换血输血)10至20年间的直接医疗成本和同种免疫事件。评估了四种匹配策略:前瞻性匹配(针对所有患者)、基于病史的匹配(仅针对既往有同种免疫的患者)、完全知情匹配(检测灵敏度100%、特异性100%)和不完全知情匹配(准确性降低)。在所有匹配方案下,匹配包括C、E、K以及存在的任何其他同种抗体。采用医院视角,成本(2012年美元)和事件进行3%的贴现。
与前瞻性匹配相比,使用1000美元检测方法的完全知情抗原匹配预计在10年内每位患者可节省82334美元。完全知情抗原匹配比基于病史的匹配成本更高,但在10年内可将同种免疫事件减少45.6%。使用该策略避免每次同种免疫事件每位患者将额外花费10934美元。使用特异性75%、灵敏度75%的检测方法进行不完全知情抗原匹配比前瞻性匹配成本更低,但会增加同种免疫事件。与基于病史的匹配相比,不完全知情匹配可使同种免疫事件减少32.61%,10年内每位患者额外成本为第147915美元。知情抗原匹配的成本效益很大程度上由检测特异性驱动。
一种特异性足够高的用于指导抗原匹配的检测方法在降低SCD输血患者的同种免疫方面可能具有成本效益。