Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Medical Education, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 Jun;26(6):741-750. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.02.909. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
Physiotherapists typically prescribe exercise therapy for people with osteoarthritis (OA) via face-to-face consultations. This study aimed to explore peoples' perceptions of exercise therapy delivered by physiotherapists via telephone for their knee OA.
A qualitative study (based on interpretivist methodology) embedded within a randomised controlled trial. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 20 people with knee OA who had received exercise advice and support from one of eight physiotherapists via telephone over 6 months. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed.
Although people with OA were initially sceptical about receiving exercise therapy via telephone, they described mostly positive experiences, valuing the convenience and accessibility. However, some desired visual contact with the physiotherapist and suggested including video-conferencing calls or an initial in-person clinic visit. Participants valued the sense of undivided focus and attention they received from the physiotherapist and believed that they were able to communicate effectively via telephone. Participants felt confident performing their exercise program without supervision and described benefits including increased muscular strength, improved pain, and ability to perform tasks that they had not been previously able to.
People with knee OA held mostly positive perceptions about receiving exercise therapy from a physiotherapist via telephone, suggesting that such a service is broadly acceptable to consumers. Such services were generally not viewed as a substitute for face-to-face physiotherapy care, but rather as a new option that could increase accessibility of physiotherapy services, particularly for follow-up consultations.
物理治疗师通常通过面对面咨询为骨关节炎(OA)患者开运动疗法处方。本研究旨在探讨人们对通过电话由物理治疗师提供的膝关节 OA 运动疗法的看法。
一项随机对照试验中嵌入的定性研究(基于解释主义方法论)。对 20 名膝关节 OA 患者进行了半结构化的个体访谈,这些患者在 6 个月内通过电话接受了一位或八位物理治疗师的运动建议和支持。访谈进行了录音、逐字记录,并进行了主题分析。
尽管 OA 患者最初对通过电话接受运动疗法持怀疑态度,但他们描述了大多是积极的体验,重视便利性和可及性。然而,一些人希望与物理治疗师进行视觉接触,并建议包括视频会议电话或初始的门诊就诊。参与者重视他们从物理治疗师那里获得的专注和关注的感觉,并且相信他们可以通过电话进行有效的沟通。参与者在没有监督的情况下进行锻炼计划时感到自信,并描述了一些好处,包括肌肉力量增强、疼痛减轻以及能够完成以前无法完成的任务。
膝关节 OA 患者对通过电话接受物理治疗师的运动疗法持有大多积极的看法,这表明这种服务对消费者具有广泛的可接受性。这种服务通常不被视为面对面物理治疗护理的替代方案,而是一种新的选择,可以增加物理治疗服务的可及性,特别是对于随访咨询。