Department of Orthopaedics, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumchi, 830002, China.
Department of Orthopaedics, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumchi, 830002, China.
Int J Surg. 2018 May;53:103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.065. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy and safety of intra-articular methylprednisolone and hyaluronic acid (HA) in term of pain reduction and improvements of knee function in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).
The PubMed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for literature up to January 2018. RCTs involving HA and methylprednisolone in knee OA were included. Two independent reviewers performed independent data abstraction. The I statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. A fixed or random effects model was adopted for meta-analysis. All meta-analyses were performed by using STATA 14.0.
Five RCTs with 1004 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The present meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences in terms of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness at 4 week, 12 weeks and 26 weeks between HA and methylprednisolone groups. No increased risk of adverse events were identified in both groups.
Both HA and methylprednisolone injections were effective therapies for patients with knee OA. Methylprednisolone showed comparable efficacy in reducing pain and improving functional recovery to HA. And no significant difference was found in long-term of follow-up in terms of adverse effects.
我们对随机对照试验(RCTs)进行了荟萃分析,以比较关节内甲泼尼龙和透明质酸(HA)在减轻膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者疼痛和改善膝关节功能方面的疗效和安全性。
系统检索了 PubMed、EMBASE、ScienceDirect 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中截至 2018 年 1 月的文献。纳入了涉及 HA 和甲泼尼龙治疗膝关节 OA 的 RCTs。两名独立评审员进行了独立的数据提取。采用 I ² 统计量评估异质性。采用固定或随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。所有荟萃分析均采用 STATA 14.0 进行。
荟萃分析纳入了 5 项 RCTs,共 1004 例患者。本荟萃分析表明,在 4 周、12 周和 26 周时,HA 组和甲泼尼龙组在 WOMAC 疼痛、躯体功能和僵硬方面均无显著差异。两组均未发现不良反应风险增加。
HA 和甲泼尼龙注射均是治疗膝关节 OA 的有效方法。甲泼尼龙在减轻疼痛和改善功能恢复方面与 HA 具有相当的疗效。在长期随访中,不良反应方面无显著差异。