Suppr超能文献

三种快速口腔液检测设备用于筛查包括氯胺酮在内的多种滥用药物的评估。

Evaluation of three rapid oral fluid test devices on the screening of multiple drugs of abuse including ketamine.

作者信息

Tang Magdalene H Y, Ching C K, Poon Simon, Chan Suzanne S S, Ng W Y, Lam M, Wong C K, Pao Ronnie, Lau Angus, Mak Tony W L

机构信息

Hospital Authority Toxicology Reference Laboratory, Hong Kong, China.

Department of General Adult Psychiatry, Castle Peak Hospital, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int. 2018 May;286:113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

Abstract

Rapid oral fluid testing (ROFT) devices have been extensively evaluated for their ability to detect common drugs of abuse; however, the performance of such devices on simultaneous screening for ketamine has been scarcely investigated. The present study evaluated three ROFT devices (DrugWipe 6S, Ora-Check and SalivaScreen) on the detection of ketamine, opiates, methamphetamine, cannabis, cocaine and MDMA. A liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LCMS) assay was firstly established and validated for confirmation analysis of the six types of drugs and/or their metabolites. In the field test, the three ROFT devices were tested on subjects recruited from substance abuse clinics/rehabilitation centre. Oral fluid was also collected using Quantisal for confirmation analysis. A total of 549 samples were collected in the study. LCMS analysis on 491 samples revealed the following drugs: codeine (55%), morphine (49%), heroin (40%), methamphetamine (35%), THC (8%), ketamine (4%) and cocaine (2%). No MDMA-positive cases were observed. Results showed that the overall specificity and accuracy were satisfactory and met the DRUID standard of >80% for all 3 devices. Ora-Check had poor sensitivities (ketamine 36%, methamphetamine 63%, opiates 53%, cocaine 60%, THC 0%). DrugWipe 6S showed good sensitivities in the methamphetamine (83%) and opiates (93%) tests but performed relatively poorly for ketamine (41%), cocaine (43%) and THC (22%). SalivaScreen also demonstrated good sensitivities in the methamphetamine (83%) and opiates (100%) tests, and had the highest sensitivity for ketamine (76%) and cocaine (71%); however, it failed to detect any of the 28 THC-positive cases. The test completion rate (proportion of tests completed with quality control passed) were: 52% (Ora-Check), 78% (SalivaScreen) and 99% (DrugWipe 6S).

摘要

快速口腔液检测(ROFT)设备已针对其检测常见滥用药物的能力进行了广泛评估;然而,此类设备同时筛查氯胺酮的性能鲜有研究。本研究评估了三种ROFT设备(DrugWipe 6S、Ora-Check和SalivaScreen)对氯胺酮、阿片类药物、甲基苯丙胺、大麻、可卡因和摇头丸的检测情况。首先建立并验证了液相色谱串联质谱(LCMS)分析法,用于这六种药物和/或其代谢物的确证分析。在现场测试中,对从药物滥用诊所/康复中心招募的受试者使用这三种ROFT设备进行检测。还使用Quantisal收集口腔液进行确证分析。本研究共收集了549份样本。对491份样本的LCMS分析显示存在以下药物:可待因(55%)、吗啡(49%)、海洛因(40%)、甲基苯丙胺(35%)、四氢大麻酚(8%)、氯胺酮(4%)和可卡因(2%)。未观察到摇头丸阳性病例。结果表明,所有3种设备的总体特异性和准确性均令人满意,符合DRUID标准(>80%)。Ora-Check的灵敏度较低(氯胺酮36%、甲基苯丙胺63%、阿片类药物53%、可卡因60%、四氢大麻酚0%)。DrugWipe 6S在甲基苯丙胺(83%)和阿片类药物(93%)检测中显示出良好的灵敏度,但在氯胺酮(41%)、可卡因(43%)和四氢大麻酚(22%)检测中表现相对较差。SalivaScreen在甲基苯丙胺(83%)和阿片类药物(100%)检测中也显示出良好的灵敏度,对氯胺酮(76%)和可卡因(71%)的灵敏度最高;然而,它未能检测出28例四氢大麻酚阳性病例中的任何一例。测试完成率(通过质量控制的测试比例)分别为:52%(Ora-Check)、78%(SalivaScreen)和99%(DrugWipe 6S)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验