Arciniega Hector, Gözenman Filiz, Jones Kevin T, Stephens Jaclyn A, Berryhill Marian E
Memory and Brain Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Program in Cognitive and Brain Sciences, and Integrative Neuroscience, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, United States.
Department of Psychology, Yaşar University, İzmir, Turkey.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2018 Mar 13;10:57. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00057. eCollection 2018.
Working memory (WM) permits maintenance of information over brief delays and is an essential executive function. Unfortunately, WM is subject to age-related decline. Some evidence supports the use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to improve visual WM. A gap in knowledge is an understanding of the mechanism characterizing these tDCS linked effects. To address this gap, we compared the effects of two tDCS montages designed on visual working memory (VWM) performance. The bifrontal montage was designed to stimulate the heightened bilateral frontal activity observed in aging adults. The unilateral frontoparietal montage was designed to stimulate activation patterns observed in young adults. Participants completed three sessions (bilateral frontal, right frontoparietal, sham) of anodal tDCS (20 min, 2 mA). During stimulation, participants performed a visual long-term memory (LTM) control task and a visual WM task. There was no effect of tDCS on the LTM task. Participants receiving right unilateral tDCS showed a WM benefit. This pattern was most robust in older adults with low WM capacity. To address the concern that the key difference between the two tDCS montages could be tDCS over the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), we included new analyses from a previous study applying tDCS targeting the PPC paired with a recognition VWM task. No significant main effects were found. A subsequent experiment in young adults found no significant effect of either tDCS montage on either task. These data indicate that tDCS montage, age and WM capacity should be considered when designing tDCS protocols. We interpret these findings as suggestive that protocols designed to restore more youthful patterns of brain activity are superior to those that compensate for age-related changes.
工作记忆(WM)能够在短暂延迟期间维持信息,是一项至关重要的执行功能。遗憾的是,工作记忆会随着年龄增长而衰退。一些证据支持使用经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)来改善视觉工作记忆。目前尚存在的知识空白是对这些与tDCS相关效应的机制缺乏了解。为填补这一空白,我们比较了两种针对视觉工作记忆(VWM)表现设计的tDCS电极贴片的效果。双侧额叶电极贴片旨在刺激在老年人中观察到的增强的双侧额叶活动。单侧额顶叶电极贴片旨在刺激在年轻人中观察到的激活模式。参与者完成了三个阳极tDCS疗程(双侧额叶、右侧额顶叶、假刺激)(20分钟,2毫安)。在刺激过程中,参与者执行了视觉长期记忆(LTM)控制任务和视觉工作记忆任务。tDCS对长期记忆任务没有影响。接受右侧单侧tDCS的参与者在工作记忆方面表现出优势。这种模式在工作记忆能力较低的老年人中最为明显。为了解决两种tDCS电极贴片之间的关键差异可能在于顶叶后皮质(PPC)上的tDCS这一担忧,我们纳入了先前一项针对PPC进行tDCS并结合识别性VWM任务的研究的新分析。未发现显著的主效应。随后在年轻人中进行的一项实验发现,两种tDCS电极贴片对任何一项任务均无显著影响。这些数据表明,在设计tDCS方案时应考虑tDCS电极贴片、年龄和工作记忆能力。我们将这些发现解释为表明,旨在恢复更年轻大脑活动模式的方案优于那些补偿与年龄相关变化的方案。