• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2000年至2019年应用远距离联想测验的创造力相关研究的系统评价。

A Systematic Review of Creativity-Related Studies Applying the Remote Associates Test From 2000 to 2019.

作者信息

Wu Ching-Lin, Huang Shih-Yuan, Chen Pei-Zhen, Chen Hsueh-Chih

机构信息

Program of Learning Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 23;11:573432. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573432. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573432
PMID:33192871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7644781/
Abstract

The study examines how the remote associates test (RAT) has been used to examine theories of creativity through a review of recent studies on creativity. Creativity-related studies published between 2000 and 2019 were retrieved from the SCOPUS database. A total of 172 papers were chosen for further analysis. Content analysis shows that research on creativity using RAT mainly concerns remote association, insight problem-solving, general creative process, test development, individual difference, effect of treatment, clinical case, social interaction effect, and predictor or criterion. The study constructs a theoretical framework based on the 4P (Product-Person-Process-Place) model and demonstrates how empirical studies using the RAT explore the individual differences, internal processes, and external influences of creative thinking. In addition, the most commonly used version of the RAT is the Compound Remote Associates Problems (Bowden and Jung-Beeman, 2003a). Current research shows a trend whereby the creative thinking process has been receiving greater attention. In particular, a growing number of studies in this field have been carried out using cognitive neuroscience technologies. These findings suggest that the RAT provides researchers with a way to deepen their understanding of different levels of creativity.

摘要

本研究通过回顾近期关于创造力的研究,探讨了远距离联想测验(RAT)如何被用于检验创造力理论。从SCOPUS数据库中检索了2000年至2019年间发表的与创造力相关的研究。总共挑选了172篇论文进行进一步分析。内容分析表明,使用RAT进行的创造力研究主要涉及远距离联想、顿悟问题解决、一般创造性过程、测验开发、个体差异、治疗效果、临床案例、社会互动效应以及预测指标或标准。该研究基于4P(产品-人-过程-地点)模型构建了一个理论框架,并展示了使用RAT的实证研究如何探索创造性思维的个体差异、内部过程和外部影响。此外,RAT最常用的版本是复合远距离联想问题(鲍登和荣格-比曼,2003a)。当前的研究表明,创造性思维过程越来越受到关注。特别是,该领域越来越多的研究使用认知神经科学技术进行。这些发现表明,RAT为研究人员提供了一种加深对不同层次创造力理解的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c60/7644781/f258e19e8a62/fpsyg-11-573432-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c60/7644781/a74726c0afa0/fpsyg-11-573432-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c60/7644781/7e4db3b6543f/fpsyg-11-573432-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c60/7644781/82a3eccb1fab/fpsyg-11-573432-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c60/7644781/f13309ae47ab/fpsyg-11-573432-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c60/7644781/f258e19e8a62/fpsyg-11-573432-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c60/7644781/a74726c0afa0/fpsyg-11-573432-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c60/7644781/7e4db3b6543f/fpsyg-11-573432-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c60/7644781/82a3eccb1fab/fpsyg-11-573432-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c60/7644781/f13309ae47ab/fpsyg-11-573432-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c60/7644781/f258e19e8a62/fpsyg-11-573432-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
A Systematic Review of Creativity-Related Studies Applying the Remote Associates Test From 2000 to 2019.2000年至2019年应用远距离联想测验的创造力相关研究的系统评价。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 23;11:573432. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573432. eCollection 2020.
2
The Development and Validity of a Chinese Version of the Compound Remote Associates Test.复合远程联想测验中文版的编制与效度研究
Am J Psychol. 2016 Sep;129:245-258. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.129.3.0245.
3
Computationally constructing a repository of compound remote associates test items in American English with comRAT-G.用 comRAT-G 在美国英语中计算构建化合物远程联想测试项目库。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Oct;50(5):1971-1980. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0965-8.
4
Modulation of automatic and creative features of the Remote Associates Test by angular gyrus stimulation.角回刺激对远程联想测验自动和创造性特征的调制。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Jun;129:348-356. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
5
The Effect of Dopaminergic Replacement Therapy on Creative Thinking and Insight Problem-Solving in Parkinson's Disease Patients.多巴胺能替代疗法对帕金森病患者创造性思维和顿悟问题解决能力的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 5;12:646448. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.646448. eCollection 2021.
6
A Visual Remote Associates Test and Its Validation.一种视觉远距离联想测验及其验证
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 28;11:26. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00026. eCollection 2020.
7
Normative data for Chinese compound remote associate problems.中文联想复合测验常模。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Dec;49(6):2163-2172. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0849-3.
8
Examining associations between social anhedonia and convergent thinking using the Remote Associates Test.使用远程联想测验考察社会快感缺失与聚合思维之间的关联。
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2022 Nov;27(6):458-470. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2022.2126302. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
9
Fostering creativity in product and service development: validation in the domain of information technology.促进产品和服务开发中的创造力:信息技术领域的验证。
Hum Factors. 2011 Jun;53(3):245-70. doi: 10.1177/0018720811409219.
10
Are All Remote Associates Tests Equal? An Overview of the Remote Associates Test in Different Languages.所有的远程联想测验都一样吗?不同语言的远程联想测验概述。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 30;11:1125. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01125. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural substrates associated with irrelevant information suppression in problem-solving: an fMRI study of the Remote Associates Test.解决问题过程中与无关信息抑制相关的神经基质:一项关于远距离联想测验的功能磁共振成像研究
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Aug 21;19:1607193. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1607193. eCollection 2025.
2
Long-distance exploration in insightful problem-solving.洞察力问题解决中的远距离探索。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Mar 26;3(1):53. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00235-4.
3
Home indoor air quality and cognitive function over one year for people working remotely during COVID-19.

本文引用的文献

1
Normative Data for 111 Compound Remote Associates Test Problems in Romanian.罗马尼亚语中111个复合远距离联想测试问题的常模数据。
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 4;10:1859. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01859. eCollection 2019.
2
Acute Stress Shapes Creative Cognition in Trait Anxiety.急性应激塑造特质焦虑中的创造性认知。
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 8;10:1517. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01517. eCollection 2019.
3
Put on your (fNIRS) thinking cap: Frontopolar activation during augmented state creativity.戴上你的(功能性近红外光谱)思考帽:增强状态创造力期间的额极激活。
新冠疫情期间远程办公人员一年来的家庭室内空气质量与认知功能
Build Environ. 2024 Jun 1;257. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111551. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
4
Controlling stimulus ambiguity reduces spurious creative ideation variance in a cyclic adaptation of the alternative uses task.控制刺激的模糊性可以减少在交替用途任务的循环适应中虚假的创造性思维差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 31;14(1):12492. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63225-2.
5
Time course of EEG power during creative problem-solving with insight or remote thinking.具有顿悟或远程思维的创造性问题解决过程中的 EEG 功率时间历程。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Jan;45(1):e26547. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26547. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
6
The Role of Semantic Associations as a Metacognitive Cue in Creative Idea Generation.语义联想作为元认知线索在创意生成中的作用。
J Intell. 2023 Mar 27;11(4):59. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11040059.
7
Human preferences toward algorithmic advice in a word association task.人类在词汇联想任务中对算法建议的偏好。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 25;12(1):14501. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18638-2.
8
Development and validation of interactive creativity task platform.交互式创造力任务平台的开发与验证
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 4;13:954946. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954946. eCollection 2022.
9
Enhanced Originality of Ideas in Women During Ovulation: A Within-Subject Design Study.排卵期女性想法的原创性增强:一项自身对照设计研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 9;13:859108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859108. eCollection 2022.
10
Modeling the Remote Associates Test as Retrievals from Semantic Memory.将远程联想测验建模为语义记忆检索。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Jun;46(6):e13145. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13145.
Behav Brain Res. 2019 Nov 5;373:112082. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112082. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
4
The Creative Healthcare Architect.创意医疗保健架构师。
HERD. 2020 Apr;13(2):119-132. doi: 10.1177/1937586719858761. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
5
Cocaine enhances figural, but impairs verbal 'flexible' divergent thinking.可卡因增强了图形,但损害了言语“灵活”发散思维。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019 Jul;29(7):813-824. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
6
Modulation of creativity by transcranial direct current stimulation.经颅直流电刺激对创造力的调制。
Brain Stimul. 2019 Sep-Oct;12(5):1213-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
7
Prefrontal Activity Measured by Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy During Divergent and Convergent Thinking in Bipolar Disorder.双相情感障碍患者发散性和聚合性思维过程中通过功能近红外光谱测量的前额叶活动。
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2018 Jul 27;56(2):86-91. doi: 10.29399/npa.23203. eCollection 2019 Jun.
8
Visual and Linguistic Stimuli in the Remote Associates Test: A Cross-Cultural Investigation.远距离联想测验中的视觉与语言刺激:一项跨文化调查
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 26;10:926. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00926. eCollection 2019.
9
Improvement in creativity after transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.左背外侧前额叶皮层经颅随机噪声刺激(tRNS)后创造力提高。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 8;9(1):7116. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43626-4.
10
Modulation of automatic and creative features of the Remote Associates Test by angular gyrus stimulation.角回刺激对远程联想测验自动和创造性特征的调制。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Jun;129:348-356. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 Apr 17.