Zheng Xiaowen, Sun Yannan, Zhang Yimei, Cai Ting, Sun Feng, Lin Jiuxiang
Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology Department of Epidemiology and Bio-Statistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(13):e0232. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010232.
Implantanchorage continues to receive much attention as an important orthodontic anchorage. Since the development of orthodontic implants, the scope of applications has continued to increase. Although multiple reviews detailing implants have been published, no comprehensive evaluations have been performed. Thus, the purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the effects of implants based on data published in review articles.An electronic search of the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, Ebsco and Sicencedirect for reviews with "orthodontic" and "systematic review or meta analysis" in the title, abstract, keywords, or full text was performed. A subsequent manual search was then performed to identify reviews concerning orthodontic implants. A manual search of the orthodontic journals American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (AJODO), European Journal of Orthodontics (EJO), and Angle Othodontist was also performed. Such systematic reviews that evaluated the efficacy and safety of orthodontic implants were used to indicate success rates and molar movements.A total of 23 reviews were included in the analysis. The quality of each review was assessed using a measurement tool for Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR), and the review chosen to summarize outcomes had a quality score of >6. Most reviews were less than moderate quality. Success rates of implants ranged in a broad scope, and movement of the maxillary first molar was superior with implants compared with traditional anchorage.
种植支抗作为一种重要的正畸支抗，一直备受关注。自正畸种植体问世以来，其应用范围不断扩大。尽管已经发表了多篇详细介绍种植体的综述，但尚未进行全面评估。因此，本研究的目的是根据综述文章中发表的数据，对种植体的效果进行全面评估。
通过对Cochrane图书馆、Medline、Embase、Ebsco和Sicencedirect进行电子检索，查找标题、摘要、关键词或全文中包含“正畸”和“系统评价或荟萃分析”的综述。随后进行手动检索，以确定有关正畸种植体的综述。还对手动检索正畸期刊《美国正畸与牙颌面正畸杂志》（AJODO）、《欧洲正畸杂志》（EJO）和《安格尔正畸医生》。这些评估正畸种植体疗效和安全性的系统评价被用于表明成功率和磨牙移动情况。
共有23篇综述纳入分析。使用多系统评价评估测量工具（AMSTAR）对每篇综述的质量进行评估，选择用于总结结果的综述质量得分>6。大多数综述质量低于中等水平。种植体的成功率范围广泛，与传统支抗相比，种植体使上颌第一磨牙的移动更明显。
