• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作心理社会因素对参与职场健康计划的交互作用。

Interactive effects of work psychosocial factors on participation in workplace wellness programs.

作者信息

Sangachin Mahboobeh Ghesmaty, Cavuoto Lora A

机构信息

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Workplace Behav Health. 2018;33(1):24-42. doi: 10.1080/15555240.2017.1408415. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1080/15555240.2017.1408415
PMID:29599663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5868489/
Abstract

This study explored concurrent effects of six work psychosocial factors on current participation and the self-reported likelihood of future participation in workplace wellness programs using a cross-sectional survey, an ad hoc focus group, and structured interviews. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to analyze survey responses from 343 employees (194 nonparticipants, 95 participants, and 54 engaged participants). A thematic analysis of focus group ( = 7) and interview ( = 5) narratives was also undertaken. In combination with high work control, high superior support was associated with an engaged participant profile. Job demand was the third important variable with low and very high levels associated with participation. With regard to high likelihood of future participation, among respondents with age older than 50, high predictability of occupational activities and control were identified as a significant factor, and among others, high superior support and control. The analysis of narratives revealed peer relations and flexible working hours to be positively linked to participation and general job stress was identified as having a bidirectional relationship. Employees stated that stress led them to take advantage of these programs as a source of relief and that their availability/participation has contributed to lowering their stress. These findings inform practitioners about the importance of addressing poor psychosocial factors as a participation barrier and having a holistic approach to employee well-being.

摘要

本研究采用横断面调查、特设焦点小组和结构化访谈,探讨了六种工作心理社会因素对当前参与度以及自我报告的未来参与职场健康计划可能性的并发影响。分类与回归树分析用于分析343名员工(194名非参与者、95名参与者和54名积极参与者)的调查回复。还对焦点小组(n = 7)和访谈(n = 5)的叙述进行了主题分析。与高工作控制相结合,高上级支持与积极参与者特征相关。工作需求是第三个重要变量,低水平和非常高水平的工作需求与参与度相关。关于未来高参与可能性,在年龄超过50岁的受访者中,职业活动的高可预测性和控制被确定为一个重要因素,此外还有高上级支持和控制。对叙述的分析表明,同伴关系和灵活工作时间与参与度呈正相关,一般工作压力被确定为具有双向关系。员工表示,压力促使他们利用这些计划作为缓解压力的来源,并且这些计划的可用性/参与有助于减轻他们的压力。这些发现告知从业者解决不良心理社会因素作为参与障碍的重要性以及对员工福祉采取整体方法的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d80/5868489/1db47b2d4d56/nihms946466f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d80/5868489/2a056ba0a041/nihms946466f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d80/5868489/e6ada73b911f/nihms946466f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d80/5868489/1db47b2d4d56/nihms946466f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d80/5868489/2a056ba0a041/nihms946466f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d80/5868489/e6ada73b911f/nihms946466f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d80/5868489/1db47b2d4d56/nihms946466f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Interactive effects of work psychosocial factors on participation in workplace wellness programs.工作心理社会因素对参与职场健康计划的交互作用。
J Workplace Behav Health. 2018;33(1):24-42. doi: 10.1080/15555240.2017.1408415. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
2
Associations between healthcare worker participation in workplace wellness activities and job satisfaction, occupational stress and burnout: a cross-sectional study in Botswana.医护人员参与职场健康活动与工作满意度、职业压力和职业倦怠之间的关联:博茨瓦纳的一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 16;8(3):e018492. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018492.
3
The Role of Leadership Support for Health Promotion in Employee Wellness Program Participation, Perceived Job Stress, and Health Behaviors.领导支持在员工健康促进项目参与、感知工作压力和健康行为方面对健康促进的作用。
Am J Health Promot. 2018 May;32(4):1054-1061. doi: 10.1177/0890117116677798. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
4
Methodological and conceptual issues regarding occupational psychosocial coronary heart disease epidemiology.职业心理社会因素与冠心病流行病学的方法学和概念性问题
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 May 1;42(3):251-5. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3557. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
5
Workforce Characteristics and Attitudes Regarding Participation in Worksite Wellness Programs.关于参与工作场所健康计划的劳动力特征和态度。
Am J Health Promot. 2017 Sep;31(5):391-400. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.140613-QUAN-283. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
6
Barriers and facilitators to participation in workplace health promotion (WHP) activities: results from a cross-sectional survey of public-sector employees in Tasmania, Australia.参与工作场所健康促进(WHP)活动的障碍与促进因素:澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚州公共部门员工横断面调查结果
Health Promot J Austr. 2017 Dec;28(3):225-232. doi: 10.1071/HE16052.
7
The effectiveness of mindfulness based programs in reducing stress experienced by nurses in adult hospital settings: a systematic review of quantitative evidence protocol.基于正念的项目在减轻成人医院环境中护士所经历压力方面的有效性:定量证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):21-9. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2380.
8
Racial Differences in Perceptions of Genetic Wellness Programs.种族差异对基因健康计划的看法。
Am J Health Promot. 2023 Sep;37(7):940-952. doi: 10.1177/08901171231184360. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
9
Effect of a Workplace Wellness Program on Employee Health and Economic Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.工作场所健康计划对员工健康和经济结果的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Apr 16;321(15):1491-1501. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.3307.
10
Organizational-level determinants of participation in workplace health promotion programs: a cross-company study.组织层面决定因素对参与工作场所健康促进计划的影响:一项跨公司研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Mar 6;19(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6578-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Mental health at work: a practical framework for employers.工作场所的心理健康:雇主实用框架
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 25;13:1552981. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1552981. eCollection 2025.
2
Telemedicine During COVID-19 Response: A Welcome Shift for Younger Female Healthcare Workers.远程医疗在新冠疫情应对中的应用:对年轻女性医护工作者而言的可喜转变。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Feb;38(3):627-632. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07785-x. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
3
A Corporate Wellness Program and Nursing Home Employees' Health.企业健康计划与养老院员工健康

本文引用的文献

1
Workplace Wellness Programs Study: Final Report.职场健康计划研究:最终报告。
Rand Health Q. 2013 Jun 1;3(2):7. eCollection 2013 Summer.
2
Does employee participation in workplace health promotion depend on the working environment? A cross-sectional study of Danish workers.员工对工作场所健康促进的参与度是否取决于工作环境?一项针对丹麦工人的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 8;6(6):e010516. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010516.
3
Obesity-related changes in prolonged repetitive lifting performance.长时间重复举重表现中与肥胖相关的变化。
Front Public Health. 2020 Oct 30;8:531116. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.531116. eCollection 2020.
Appl Ergon. 2016 Sep;56:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
4
The Invisible Employee: University Housekeeping Employees' Perceptions of Physical Activity.隐形员工:大学保洁员工对体育活动的认知
J Phys Act Health. 2016 Sep;13(9):952-6. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2015-0509. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
5
Factors Associated With Participation in a University Worksite Wellness Program.与参与大学工作场所健康计划相关的因素。
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jul;51(1):e1-e11. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.01.028. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
6
Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults and Youth: United States, 2011-2014.2011 - 2014年美国成年人及青少年肥胖症患病率
NCHS Data Brief. 2015 Nov(219):1-8.
7
Prevalence of and Trends in Diabetes Among Adults in the United States, 1988-2012.美国成年人糖尿病患病率及趋势(1988 年至 2012 年)。
JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):1021-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10029.
8
Modeling the spread of an obesity intervention through a social network.通过社交网络对肥胖干预措施的传播进行建模。
J Healthc Eng. 2014;5(3):293-312. doi: 10.1260/2040-2295.5.3.293.
9
Do workplace health promotion (wellness) programs work?工作场所健康促进(健康养生)计划是否有效?
J Occup Environ Med. 2014 Sep;56(9):927-34. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000276.
10
Integration of health protection and health promotion: rationale, indicators, and metrics.卫生保护与健康促进的整合:基本原理、指标和衡量标准。
J Occup Environ Med. 2013 Dec;55(12 Suppl):S12-8. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000032.