• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞士腰椎管狭窄症问卷对伊朗腰椎管狭窄症患者的信度和效度

Reliability and Validity of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire for Iranian Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

作者信息

Heshmati Afshin Ahmadzadeh, Mirzaee Moghaddameh

机构信息

Bahonar Hospital, School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Science, Kerman, Iran.

School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Science, Kerman, Iran.

出版信息

Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2018 Mar;6(2):119-123.

PMID:29600264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5867355/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was validation of the Persian translation of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire in order to be used by Iranian researchers.

METHODS

A total of 104 patients with spinal stenosis diagnosis, who were candidates for operative treatment were entered into the study. The patients completed the translated questionnaire in the 1 and the 7 days of admission and 6 months after surgery. Visual analogue scale was used to determine the severity of the pain in the1 day and the 6 month. Discriminant validity, convergent validity, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, ability to detect changes and sensitivity to clinical changes were assessed for the statistical purposes.

RESULTS

Cronbach's α was more than 0.9 for all the items. ICC was about 0.9 for all the items. For symptoms, physical and total items, Cronbach's α was 0.942, 0.957, 0.926 and Intraclass correlation were 0.891, 0.918, 0.862, respectively. Paired t-test was significantly different between the 1 day and the 6 month questionnaire. There was a positive correlation either between the first VAS and the 1 day questionnaire (1 day Q) (r=0.892, ) or between the 6th month VAS and 6 month Q (r=0.940, ). The Pearson's correlation between the difference of the total scores of the 1 day and the 6 month and satisfaction score after surgery showed negative correlation (r= -0.746, ). The effect size was 2.55.

CONCLUSION

The Iranian version of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis has excellent internal consistency, excellent reliability, good ability to alter with changes, especially parallel with clinical improvement, excellent ability to detect changes, and well either convergent or discriminant validity. II.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在验证瑞士脊柱狭窄症问卷的波斯语翻译版本,以便伊朗研究人员使用。

方法

共有104名诊断为脊柱狭窄且适合手术治疗的患者纳入本研究。患者在入院第1天、第7天以及术后6个月完成翻译后的问卷。采用视觉模拟评分法确定术后第1天和6个月时的疼痛严重程度。出于统计目的,评估了判别效度、收敛效度、重测信度、内部一致性、检测变化的能力以及对临床变化的敏感性。

结果

所有项目的Cronbach's α均大于0.9。所有项目的组内相关系数(ICC)约为0.9。对于症状、身体状况和总分项目,Cronbach's α分别为0.942、0.957、0.926,组内相关系数分别为0.891、0.918、0.862。配对t检验显示第1天和6个月问卷之间存在显著差异。术后第1天视觉模拟评分(VAS)与第1天问卷(1天Q)之间(r = 0.892)以及术后6个月VAS与6个月问卷之间(r = 0.940)均呈正相关。术后第1天和6个月总分差值与术后满意度评分之间的Pearson相关性呈负相关(r = -0.746)。效应量为2.55。

结论

瑞士脊柱狭窄症问卷的伊朗版本具有出色的内部一致性、卓越的信度、良好的随变化而改变的能力,尤其是与临床改善平行,出色的检测变化能力,以及良好的收敛效度和判别效度。二、

相似文献

1
Reliability and Validity of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire for Iranian Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.瑞士腰椎管狭窄症问卷对伊朗腰椎管狭窄症患者的信度和效度
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2018 Mar;6(2):119-123.
2
Severity of symptoms, physical functioning and satisfaction in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a validation study of the Iranian version of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Score.腰椎管狭窄症患者的症状严重程度、身体功能及满意度:瑞士腰椎管狭窄症评分伊朗版的验证研究
J Neurosurg Sci. 2014 Sep;58(3):177-82.
3
Reliability and Validity of the Thai Version of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire.瑞士脊柱狭窄症问卷泰语版的信度和效度
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Mar 1;46(5):E338-E343. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003781.
4
Validation and reliability of the Persian version of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.苏黎世跛行问卷波斯语版本在腰椎管狭窄症患者中的效度与信度
N Am Spine Soc J. 2023 Jun 22;15:100237. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100237. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Reliability and validity of simplified Chinese version of Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire for patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.瑞士腰椎管狭窄症问卷简体中文版对退变性腰椎管狭窄症患者的信度和效度
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 May 1;39(10):820-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000273.
6
French-Canadian Adaptation and Validation of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire for Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.《腰椎管狭窄症患者瑞士脊柱狭窄问卷的加拿大法语适应性和验证》。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Apr 15;44(8):E487-E493. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002896.
7
Large prospective validation and cultural adaptation of the Polish version of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.针对腰椎管狭窄症患者的瑞士脊柱狭窄症问卷波兰语版本的大型前瞻性验证及文化适应性研究
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2017 Dec 23;24(4):676-682. doi: 10.26444/aaem/78674. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
8
Validation and Cross-cultural Adaptation of the Korean Version of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.《Zurich 间歇性跛行问卷》韩文版在腰椎管狭窄症患者中的验证和跨文化调适。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Jan 15;43(2):E105-E110. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002241.
9
An Iranian Version of the Fukushima Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Scale (FLS-25): A Validation Study.福岛腰椎管狭窄量表(FLS - 25)的伊朗版本:一项验证研究。
Asian Spine J. 2017 Apr;11(2):243-248. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.2.243. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
10
Initial validation of the Yin-Yang Assessment Questionnaire for persons with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者阴阳评估问卷的初步验证
World J Diabetes. 2015 Sep 10;6(11):1198-206. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i11.1198.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability, validity and minimum clinical importance difference of the Chinese version of the Zurich claudication questionnaire.中文版苏黎世间歇性跛行问卷的信度、效度及最小临床重要差异
Sci Rep. 2025 May 13;15(1):16654. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01380-w.
2
Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of the Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire-Scoliosis in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Who Did Not Have Surgical Indication.无手术指征的青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者中波斯语版身体意象障碍问卷 - 脊柱侧凸的信度和效度
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2023;11(2):130-135. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2022.66298.3170.
3
Translation and Validation of the Danish Version of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire.《苏黎世跛行问卷》丹麦语版本的翻译与验证
Global Spine J. 2022 Jan;12(1):53-60. doi: 10.1177/2192568220947745. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
4
Accuracy Assessment of Freehand Pedicular Screw Placement.徒手椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性评估
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2020 Jul;8(4):519-523. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2018.31503.1819.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis: eight-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).腰椎管狭窄症的长期预后:脊柱患者预后研究试验(SPORT)的八年结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jan 15;40(2):63-76. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000731.
2
Reliability and validity of a questionnaire for self-assessment of complete dentures.全口义齿自我评估问卷的信度和效度。
BMC Oral Health. 2014 May 2;14:45. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-45.
3
Lumbar spinal stenosis-diagnosis and management of the aging spine.腰椎管狭窄症——老年脊柱的诊断与治疗
Man Ther. 2011 Aug;16(4):308-17. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
4
Internal construct validity of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis questionnaire: Rasch analysis of a disease-specific outcome measure for lumbar spinal stenosis.瑞士腰椎狭窄问卷的内部结构效度:一种用于腰椎狭窄症的疾病特异性结局测量的 Rasch 分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Nov 1;36(23):1969-76. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181fc9daf.
5
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
6
Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.组内相关系数:在评估评分者可靠性中的应用。
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.
7
Spinal stenosis: pathophysiology, clinical and radiologic classification.脊柱狭窄:病理生理学、临床及影像学分类
Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:287-302.
8
Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain.针对腰痛患者的Oswestry功能障碍指数土耳其语版本的验证
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Mar 1;29(5):581-5; discussion 585. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000113869.13209.03.
9
The reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.穿梭步行试验、瑞士腰椎管狭窄症问卷、牛津腰椎管狭窄症评分及Oswestry功能障碍指数在腰椎管狭窄症患者评估中的可靠性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jan 1;27(1):84-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200201010-00020.
10
An assessment of sensitivity to change of the Oral Health Impact Profile in a clinical trial.一项关于临床试验中口腔健康影响程度量表对变化的敏感性评估。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001 Jun;29(3):175-82. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2001.290303.x.