Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Surg Endosc. 2018 Oct;32(10):4228-4234. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6169-1. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
Recently, several new imaging technologies, such as three-dimensional (3D)/high-definition (HD) stereovision and high-resolution two-dimensional (2D)/4K monitors, have been introduced in laparoscopic surgery. However, it is still unclear whether these technologies actually improve surgical performance.
Participants were 11 expert laparoscopic surgeons. We designed three laparoscopic suturing tasks (task 1: simple suturing, task 2: knotting thread in a small box, and task 3: suturing in a narrow space) in training boxes. Performances were recorded by an optical position tracker. All participants first performed each task five times consecutively using a conventional 2D/HD monitor. Then they were randomly divided into two groups: six participants performed the tasks using 3D/HD before using 2D/4K; the other five participants performed the tasks using a 2D/4K monitor before the 3D/HD monitor. After the trials, we evaluated the performance scores (operative time, path length of forceps, and technical errors) and compared performance scores across all monitors.
Surgical performances of participants were ranked in decreasing order: 3D/HD, 2D/4K, and 2D/HD using the total scores for each task. In task 1 (simple suturing), some surgical performances using 3D/HD were significantly better than those using 2D/4K (P = 0.017, P = 0.033, P = 0.492 for operative time, path length, and technical errors, respectively). On the other hand, with operation in narrow spaces such as in tasks 2 and 3, performances using 2D/4K were not inferior to 3D/HD performances. The high-resolution images from the 2D/4K monitor may enhance depth perception in narrow spaces and may complement stereoscopic vision almost as well as using 3D/HD.
Compared to a 2D/HD monitor, a 3D/HD monitor improved the laparoscopic surgical technique of expert surgeons more than a 2D/4K monitor. However, the advantage of 2D/4K high-resolution images may be comparable to a 3D/HD monitor especially in narrow spaces.
最近,腹腔镜手术中引入了一些新的成像技术,如三维(3D)/高清(HD)立体视觉和高分辨率二维(2D)/4K 显示器。然而,这些技术是否确实能提高手术效果仍不清楚。
参与者为 11 名熟练的腹腔镜外科医生。我们在培训箱中设计了三个腹腔镜缝合任务(任务 1:简单缝合,任务 2:在小盒子中系线,任务 3:在狭窄空间中缝合)。使用光学位置跟踪器记录所有参与者的表现。所有参与者首先连续五次使用传统的 2D/HD 显示器完成每个任务。然后,他们被随机分为两组:六名参与者使用 3D/HD 显示器进行 3D/HD 操作,然后使用 2D/4K 显示器;另外五名参与者使用 2D/4K 显示器进行 2D/4K 操作,然后使用 3D/HD 显示器。试验后,我们评估了绩效评分(手术时间、钳子路径长度和技术错误),并比较了所有显示器的绩效评分。
参与者的手术表现按降序排列:3D/HD、2D/4K 和 2D/HD,每个任务的总分。在任务 1(简单缝合)中,使用 3D/HD 的一些手术表现明显优于使用 2D/4K 的手术表现(手术时间、路径长度和技术错误分别为 P=0.017、P=0.033 和 P=0.492)。另一方面,在任务 2 和任务 3 等狭窄空间的操作中,使用 2D/4K 的表现并不逊于 3D/HD 的表现。2D/4K 显示器的高分辨率图像可能会增强在狭窄空间中的深度感知,并且几乎可以与使用 3D/HD 一样补充立体视觉。
与 2D/HD 显示器相比,3D/HD 显示器改善了熟练外科医生的腹腔镜手术技术,优于 2D/4K 显示器。然而,2D/4K 高分辨率图像的优势可能与 3D/HD 显示器相当,尤其是在狭窄空间中。