• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

问题生成活动对学生学习和认知的影响。

The effect of question generation activity on students' learning and perception.

作者信息

Shakurnia Abdolhussein, Aslami Maryam, Bijanzadeh Mahdi

机构信息

Departartment of Immunology, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

Educational development center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

出版信息

J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2018 Apr;6(2):70-77.

PMID:29607334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5856907/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Student-generated questions can be a very helpful tool in medical education. The use of this activity can allow the students to feel more involved in the subjects covered and may improve their knowledge and learning. The aim of this study was to identify the effect of question-writing activity as a stimulus factor on learning in midwifery students and determine their perception about this activity.

METHODS

This quasi-experimental study with two groups of pre- and post-tests was conducted on two groups of midwifery students who had taken the immunology course. Two classes of midwifery students (N=62) participated and were randomly assigned to two different groups. One class was selected as the experimental group (n=32) and the other class was considered as the control group (n=30). The experimental group's students were asked to write questions covering different topics of the syllabus components taught during 15 weeks from February 2016 to May 2016. They were asked to write, answer and explain their multiple-choice questions (MCQs). The students' performance in immunology course was compared between the two groups at the end of the semester. After their final exam, we asked them to fill in a questionnaire on their views about this activity. The data were analyzed by independent t- test using SPSS software, version 18.

RESULTS

The differences between pre- and post-test mean scores of the experimental and control groups were 24.53±5.74 and 20.63±5.58, respectively. The results of independent t-test showed that these differences in the two groups were significant (p=0.009). Nevertheless, most of the students stated that question-writing activity as a learning tool is an unfamiliar exercise and unpopular learning strategy.

CONCLUSION

Results showed that question writing by students has been found to promote learning when it is implemented as a part of the teaching curriculum in immunology course; therefore, this activity could be effective in improving the students' learning.

摘要

引言

学生自主提出的问题在医学教育中可能是非常有用的工具。开展这项活动能让学生更深入参与所学课程内容,并可能增进他们的知识和学习效果。本研究的目的是确定写问题活动作为一种刺激因素对助产专业学生学习的影响,并了解他们对该活动的看法。

方法

本准实验研究采用两组前后测设计,对象为两组修过免疫学课程的助产专业学生。两组助产专业学生(N = 62)参与研究并被随机分为两组。其中一个班级被选为实验组(n = 32),另一个班级作为对照组(n = 30)。要求实验组学生针对2016年2月至20l6年5月15周内所教授的教学大纲各部分不同主题编写问题。他们需要编写、回答并解释多项选择题(MCQ)。学期末比较两组学生在免疫学课程中的表现。期末考试后,要求他们填写一份关于对该活动看法的问卷。使用SPSS 18.0软件通过独立t检验对数据进行分析。

结果

实验组和对照组前后测平均分数的差异分别为24.53±5.74和20.63±5.58。独立t检验结果显示两组间的这些差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.009)。然而,大多数学生表示,将写问题活动作为一种学习工具是一种不熟悉的练习方式,且不受欢迎。

结论

结果表明,当学生写问题活动作为免疫学课程教学大纲的一部分实施时,已被发现能促进学习;因此,该活动在提高学生学习效果方面可能是有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fae/5856907/077844d82225/JAMP-6-70-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fae/5856907/077844d82225/JAMP-6-70-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fae/5856907/077844d82225/JAMP-6-70-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of question generation activity on students' learning and perception.问题生成活动对学生学习和认知的影响。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2018 Apr;6(2):70-77.
2
Training Medical Students to Create and Collaboratively Review Multiple-Choice Questions: A Comprehensive Workshop.培训医学生创建和协作审查多项选择题:综合研讨会。
MedEdPORTAL. 2020 Oct 6;16:10986. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10986.
3
PeerWise and Pathology: Discontinuing a teaching innovation that did not achieve its potential.同伴互评与病理学:终止一项未发挥其潜力的教学创新。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Oct 14;9:27. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000027.2. eCollection 2020.
4
A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.一种由学生主导的新颖方法,用于生成多项选择题并创建在线数据库,同时有针对性地征求临床医生的意见。
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(2):182-8. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1011651.
5
Promoting an active form of learning out-of-class via answering online "study questions" leads to higher than expected exam scores in General Biology.通过回答在线“学习问题”来促进课外积极的学习形式,会使普通生物学的考试成绩高于预期。
PeerJ. 2015 Oct 8;3:e1322. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1322. eCollection 2015.
6
Comparison of the effect of lecture and blended teaching methods on students' learning and satisfaction.讲座式教学法与混合式教学法对学生学习及满意度影响的比较
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2014 Oct;2(4):146-50.
7
Nursing and midwifery students' perception of learning enablers and gains in the first semester of their BSc programmes: A cross sectional study.护理和助产学专业学生在本科第一学期对学习促进因素和收获的感知:一项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Jun;65:242-249. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.03.010. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
8
The use of crossword puzzles as an educational tool.填字游戏作为一种教育工具的用途。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2021 Apr;9(2):102-108. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2021.87911.1330.
9
Question-writing as a learning tool for students--outcomes from curricular exams.问题式写作作为学生的学习工具——课程考试的结果。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Jun 21;13:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-89.
10
The effectiveness of the combined problem-based learning (PBL) and case-based learning (CBL) teaching method in the clinical practical teaching of thyroid disease.基于问题的学习(PBL)与基于案例的学习(CBL)相结合的教学方法在甲状腺疾病临床实践教学中的有效性。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Oct 22;20(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02306-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Effectiveness of Student-generated Scenario-based Questions as a Tool for Active Learning.评估学生生成的基于情景的问题作为主动学习工具的有效性。
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2024 Oct-Dec;14(4):278-283. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_320_24. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
2
Assessing an integrated team-teaching lecture in medicine and surgery program- Galala University.评估加拉拉大学校医学和外科学项目中的综合团队教学讲座。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 12;24(1):754. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05685-8.
3
Does developing multiple-choice Questions Improve Medical Students' Learning? A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Students generate items for an online formative assessment: Is it motivating?学生们为在线形成性评估生成题目:这有激励作用吗?
Med Teach. 2017 Mar;39(3):315-320. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1270428. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
2
Challenging students to formulate written questions: a randomized controlled trial to assess learning effects.要求学生编写书面问题:一项评估学习效果的随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Mar 21;15:56. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0336-z.
3
Best practice strategies for effective use of questions as a teaching tool.有效运用提问作为教学工具的最佳实践策略。
多选题的开发是否能提高医学生的学习效果?系统评价。
Med Educ Online. 2022 Dec;27(1):2005505. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.2005505.
4
Use of Student-Generated Multiple Choice Questions to Enhance Team-Based Learning of Anatomy at the University of Rwanda.卢旺达大学利用学生自主生成的多项选择题来加强基于团队的解剖学学习。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020 Nov 3;11:825-832. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S274298. eCollection 2020.
5
Creating assessments as an active learning strategy: what are students' perceptions? A mixed methods study.创建评估作为一种主动学习策略:学生的看法是什么?一项混合方法研究。
Med Educ Online. 2019 Dec;24(1):1630239. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1630239.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Sep 12;77(7):155. doi: 10.5688/ajpe777155.
4
Question-writing as a learning tool for students--outcomes from curricular exams.问题式写作作为学生的学习工具——课程考试的结果。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Jun 21;13:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-89.
5
Comparative effects of test-enhanced learning and self-explanation on long-term retention.测试增强学习与自我解释对长期保持的比较效果。
Med Educ. 2013 Jul;47(7):674-82. doi: 10.1111/medu.12141.
6
A participatory learning approach to biochemistry using student authored and evaluated multiple-choice questions.一种使用学生自主编写和评估的多项选择题进行生物化学学习的参与式方法。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2011 Sep-Oct;39(5):352-61. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20526.
7
Formulation of questions followed by small group discussion as a revision exercise at the end of a teaching module in biochemistry.在生物化学教学模块结束时,提出问题并随后进行小组讨论作为复习练习。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2007 Jan;35(1):45-8. doi: 10.1002/bmb.3.
8
Student generated questions drive learning in the classroom.学生提出的问题推动课堂学习。
Med Teach. 2010;32(9):789. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.513224.
9
Students generating questions for their own written examinations.学生为自己的书面考试生成问题。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011 Dec;16(5):703-10. doi: 10.1007/s10459-009-9196-9. Epub 2009 Sep 12.
10
Constructing multiple choice questions as a method for learning.构建多项选择题作为一种学习方法。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2006 Sep;35(9):604-8.