Suppr超能文献

将升温限制在1.5°C的途径:能迅速扭转局面的故事?

Pathways limiting warming to 1.5°C: a tale of turning around in no time?

作者信息

Kriegler Elmar, Luderer Gunnar, Bauer Nico, Baumstark Lavinia, Fujimori Shinichiro, Popp Alexander, Rogelj Joeri, Strefler Jessica, van Vuuren Detlef P

机构信息

Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Member of the Leibniz Association, Potsdam, Germany

Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Member of the Leibniz Association, Potsdam, Germany.

出版信息

Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2018 May 13;376(2119). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0457.

Abstract

We explore the feasibility of limiting global warming to 1.5°C without overshoot and without the deployment of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies. For this purpose, we perform a sensitivity analysis of four generic emissions reduction measures to identify a lower bound on future CO emissions from fossil fuel combustion and industrial processes. Final energy demand reductions and electrification of energy end uses as well as decarbonization of electricity and non-electric energy supply are all considered. We find the lower bound of cumulative fossil fuel and industry CO emissions to be 570 GtCO for the period 2016-2100, around 250 GtCO lower than the lower end of available 1.5°C mitigation pathways generated with integrated assessment models. Estimates of 1.5°C-consistent CO budgets are highly uncertain and range between 100 and 900 GtCO from 2016 onwards. Based on our sensitivity analysis, limiting warming to 1.5°C will require CDR or terrestrial net carbon uptake if 1.5°C-consistent budgets are smaller than 650 GtCO The earlier CDR is deployed, the more it neutralizes post-2020 emissions rather than producing net negative emissions. Nevertheless, if the 1.5°C budget is smaller than 550 GtCO, temporary overshoot of the 1.5°C limit becomes unavoidable if CDR cannot be ramped up faster than to 4 GtCO in 2040 and 10 GtCO in 2050.This article is part of the theme issue 'The Paris Agreement: understanding the physical and social challenges for a warming world of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels'.

摘要

我们探讨了在不超调且不部署二氧化碳去除(CDR)技术的情况下将全球变暖限制在1.5°C的可行性。为此,我们对四种通用的减排措施进行了敏感性分析,以确定化石燃料燃烧和工业过程未来二氧化碳排放的下限。最终能源需求减少、能源终端使用的电气化以及电力和非电力能源供应的脱碳均在考虑范围内。我们发现,2016年至2100年期间,化石燃料和工业累计二氧化碳排放的下限为5700亿吨二氧化碳,比综合评估模型生成的1.5°C缓解路径下限低约2500亿吨二氧化碳。从2016年起,与1.5°C一致的二氧化碳预算估计高度不确定,范围在100至9000亿吨二氧化碳之间。基于我们的敏感性分析,如果与1.5°C一致的预算小于6500亿吨二氧化碳,将升温限制在1.5°C将需要CDR或陆地净碳吸收。CDR部署得越早,它对2020年后排放的中和作用就越大,而不是产生净负排放。然而,如果1.5°C预算小于5500亿吨二氧化碳,若CDR在2040年的增速不能快于40亿吨二氧化碳,在2050年不能快于100亿吨二氧化碳,那么1.5°C限制的暂时超调将不可避免。本文是主题为“《巴黎协定》:理解升温比工业化前水平高1.5°C的变暖世界所面临的物理和社会挑战”这一特刊的一部分。

相似文献

4
Mitigation and adaptation emissions embedded in the broader climate transition.广义气候转型过程中所包含的缓解和适应排放量。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov 22;119(47):e2123486119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2123486119. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
5
Constraints on global temperature target overshoot.对全球温度目标超调的限制。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 7;7(1):14743. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14503-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Constraints on global temperature target overshoot.对全球温度目标超调的限制。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 7;7(1):14743. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14503-9.
2
A roadmap for rapid decarbonization.快速脱碳路线图。
Science. 2017 Mar 24;355(6331):1269-1271. doi: 10.1126/science.aah3443.
5
Material efficiency: providing material services with less material production.材料效率:用更少的物质生产提供物质服务。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2013 Jan 28;371(1986):20120496. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0496. Print 2013 Mar 13.
8
Carbon neutral hydrocarbons.碳中和碳氢化合物。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2008 Nov 13;366(1882):3901-18. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0143.
9
Managing climate risk.应对气候风险。
Science. 2001 Oct 26;294(5543):786-7. doi: 10.1126/science.294.5543.786b.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验