• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对全球温度目标超调的限制。

Constraints on global temperature target overshoot.

作者信息

Ricke K L, Millar R J, MacMartin D G

机构信息

Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego, La Jolla, USA.

School of Global Policy and Strategy, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 7;7(1):14743. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14503-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-14503-9
PMID:29116149
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5676680/
Abstract

In the aftermath of the Paris Agreement, the climate science and policy communities are beginning to assess the feasibility and potential benefits of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C or 2 °C above preindustrial. Understanding the dependence of the magnitude and duration of possible temporary exceedance (i.e., "overshoot") of temperature targets on sustainable energy decarbonization futures and carbon dioxide (CO) removal rates will be an important contribution to this policy discussion. Drawing upon results from the mitigation literature and the IPCC Working Group 3 (WG3) scenario database, we examine the global mean temperature implications of differing, independent pathways for the decarbonization of global energy supply and the implementation of negative emissions technologies. We find that within the scope of scenarios broadly-consistent with the WG3 database, the magnitude of temperature overshoot is more sensitive to the rate of decarbonization. However, limiting the duration of overshoot to less than two centuries requires ambitious deployment of both decarbonization and negative emissions technology. The dependencies of temperature target overshoot's properties upon currently untested negative emissions technologies suggests that it will be important to consider how climate impacts depend on both the magnitude and duration of overshoot, not just long term residual warming.

摘要

在《巴黎协定》之后,气候科学和政策界开始评估将全球变暖限制在比工业化前水平高1.5摄氏度或2摄氏度的可行性和潜在益处。了解温度目标可能出现的暂时超标(即“超调”)的幅度和持续时间对可持续能源脱碳前景以及二氧化碳(CO)去除率的依赖性,将对这一政策讨论做出重要贡献。借鉴减缓文献和政府间气候变化专门委员会第三工作组(WG3)情景数据库的结果,我们研究了全球能源供应脱碳和负排放技术实施的不同独立路径对全球平均温度的影响。我们发现,在与WG3数据库大致一致的情景范围内,温度超调的幅度对脱碳速度更为敏感。然而,将超调持续时间限制在两个世纪以内需要大力部署脱碳和负排放技术。温度目标超调特性对目前未经测试的负排放技术的依赖性表明,重要的是要考虑气候影响如何既取决于超调的幅度又取决于超调的持续时间,而不仅仅是长期的残余变暖。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8be7/5676680/488d7d5a8ea5/41598_2017_14503_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8be7/5676680/38552d6ae46b/41598_2017_14503_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8be7/5676680/1a4dbd6d0bb3/41598_2017_14503_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8be7/5676680/488d7d5a8ea5/41598_2017_14503_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8be7/5676680/38552d6ae46b/41598_2017_14503_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8be7/5676680/1a4dbd6d0bb3/41598_2017_14503_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8be7/5676680/488d7d5a8ea5/41598_2017_14503_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Constraints on global temperature target overshoot.对全球温度目标超调的限制。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 7;7(1):14743. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14503-9.
2
Pathways limiting warming to 1.5°C: a tale of turning around in no time?将升温限制在1.5°C的途径:能迅速扭转局面的故事?
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2018 May 13;376(2119). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0457.
3
Risks to biodiversity from temperature overshoot pathways.温度超调路径对生物多样性的风险。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Aug 15;377(1857):20210394. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0394. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
4
When could global warming reach 4°C?全球变暖何时会达到 4°C?
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2011 Jan 13;369(1934):67-84. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0292.
5
Timescales of the permafrost carbon cycle and legacy effects of temperature overshoot scenarios.永久冻土碳循环的时间尺度和温度超调情景的遗留效应。
Nat Commun. 2021 May 11;12(1):2688. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23010-5.
6
Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).减少废弃物产生的全球温室气体排放:政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)第四次评估报告的结论与策略。第三工作组(减缓气候变化)
Waste Manag Res. 2008 Feb;26(1):11-32. doi: 10.1177/0734242X07088433.
7
Mitigation and adaptation emissions embedded in the broader climate transition.广义气候转型过程中所包含的缓解和适应排放量。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov 22;119(47):e2123486119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2123486119. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
8
Institutional decarbonization scenarios evaluated against the Paris Agreement 1.5 °C goal.针对《巴黎协定》1.5°C 目标评估的机构脱碳情景。
Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 16;13(1):4304. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31734-1.
9
Optimal temperature overshoot profile found by limiting global sea level rise as a lower-cost climate target.通过将全球海平面上升限制作为成本更低的气候目标而找到的最优温度超调曲线。
Sci Adv. 2020 Jan 8;6(2):eaaw9490. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw9490. eCollection 2020 Jan.
10
Limiting global-mean temperature increase to 1.5-2 °C could reduce the incidence and spatial spread of dengue fever in Latin America.将全球平均气温上升幅度限制在 1.5-2°C 以内,可能会减少拉丁美洲登革热的发病率和空间传播。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 12;115(24):6243-6248. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718945115. Epub 2018 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Genome editing in Sub-Saharan Africa: a game-changing strategy for climate change mitigation and sustainable agriculture.撒哈拉以南非洲的基因组编辑:应对气候变化和可持续农业的变革性策略。
GM Crops Food. 2024 Dec 31;15(1):279-302. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2024.2411767. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
2
Scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification.太阳辐射干预建模的场景。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Aug 16;119(33):e2202230119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2202230119. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
3
Climate change/global warming/climate emergency versus general climate research: comparative bibliometric trends of publications.

本文引用的文献

1
The trouble with negative emissions.负排放的问题。
Science. 2016 Oct 14;354(6309):182-183. doi: 10.1126/science.aah4567.
2
Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C.《巴黎协定》气候提案需要进一步推动,才能将升温控制在 2°C 以下。
Nature. 2016 Jun 30;534(7609):631-9. doi: 10.1038/nature18307.
3
CLIMATE POLICY. Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change?气候政策。巴黎协定的承诺能否避免严重的气候变化?
气候变化/全球变暖/气候紧急状况与一般气候研究:出版物的比较文献计量趋势
Heliyon. 2021 Oct 19;7(11):e08219. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08219. eCollection 2021 Nov.
4
Prospective contributions of biomass pyrolysis to China's 2050 carbon reduction and renewable energy goals.展望生物质热解对中国 2050 年碳减排和可再生能源目标的贡献。
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 16;12(1):1698. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21868-z.
5
Climate change causes critical transitions and irreversible alterations of mountain forests.气候变化导致山地森林发生关键转变和不可逆转的改变。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Jul;26(7):4013-4027. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15118. Epub 2020 May 8.
6
Solar geoengineering as part of an overall strategy for meeting the 1.5°C Paris target.作为实现《巴黎协定》1.5°C目标总体战略一部分的太阳地球工程。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2018 May 13;376(2119). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0454.
7
Pathways limiting warming to 1.5°C: a tale of turning around in no time?将升温限制在1.5°C的途径:能迅速扭转局面的故事?
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2018 May 13;376(2119). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0457.
Science. 2015 Dec 4;350(6265):1168-9. doi: 10.1126/science.aad5761. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
4
Future CO2 emissions and climate change from existing energy infrastructure.现有能源基础设施的未来二氧化碳排放和气候变化。
Science. 2010 Sep 10;329(5997):1330-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1188566.