• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会排斥如何调节社会信息处理:面部表情和注视方向之间的行为分离。

How social exclusion modulates social information processing: A behavioural dissociation between facial expressions and gaze direction.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Milan - Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

NeuroMI: Milan Center for Neuroscience, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Apr 4;13(4):e0195100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195100. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0195100
PMID:29617410
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5884539/
Abstract

Social exclusion is a painful experience that is felt as a threat to the human need to belong and can lead to increased aggressive and anti-social behaviours, and results in emotional and cognitive numbness. Excluded individuals also seem to show an automatic tuning to positivity: they tend to increase their selective attention towards social acceptance signals. Despite these effects known in the literature, the consequences of social exclusion on social information processing still need to be explored in depth. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of social exclusion on processing two features that are strictly bound in the appraisal of the meaning of facial expressions: gaze direction and emotional expression. In two experiments (N = 60, N = 45), participants were asked to identify gaze direction or emotional expressions from facial stimuli, in which both these features were manipulated. They performed these tasks in a four-block crossed design after being socially included or excluded using the Cyberball game. Participants' empathy and self-reported emotions were recorded using the Empathy Quotient (EQ) and PANAS questionnaires. The Need Threat Scale and three additional questions were also used as manipulation checks in the second experiment. In both experiments, excluded participants showed to be less accurate than included participants in gaze direction discrimination. Modulatory effects of direct gaze (Experiment 1) and sad expression (Experiment 2) on the effects of social exclusion were found on response times (RTs) in the emotion recognition task. Specific differences in the reaction to social exclusion between males and females were also found in Experiment 2: excluded male participants tended to be less accurate and faster than included male participants, while excluded females showed a more accurate and slower performance than included female participants. No influence of social exclusion on PANAS or EQ scores was found. Results are discussed in the context of the importance of identifying gaze direction in appraisal theories.

摘要

社会排斥是一种痛苦的体验,被视为对人类归属感的威胁,可能导致攻击性和反社会行为增加,并导致情感和认知麻木。被排斥的个体似乎也表现出对积极性的自动调整:他们倾向于增加对社会接纳信号的选择性注意。尽管文献中已知这些影响,但社会排斥对社会信息处理的后果仍需要深入探讨。本研究旨在探讨社会排斥对处理面部表情意义评估中两个紧密结合的特征的影响:注视方向和情绪表达。在两项实验中(N = 60,N = 45),参与者被要求从面部刺激中识别注视方向或情绪表达,其中这两个特征都被操纵。他们在使用 Cyberball 游戏进行社交包含或排斥后,以四组交叉设计进行这些任务。参与者的同理心和自我报告的情绪使用同理心商数(EQ)和 PANAS 问卷进行记录。需要威胁量表和另外三个问题也被用作第二个实验中的操纵检查。在两项实验中,被排斥的参与者在注视方向辨别任务中的准确性都低于被包含的参与者。直接注视(实验 1)和悲伤表情(实验 2)对社会排斥效应的调节作用在情绪识别任务的反应时间(RT)上表现出来。实验 2中还发现了男性和女性对社会排斥的反应的特定差异:被排斥的男性参与者的准确性和速度都低于被包含的男性参与者,而被排斥的女性参与者的准确性和速度都低于被包含的女性参与者。社会排斥对 PANAS 或 EQ 分数没有影响。结果在识别评价理论中注视方向的重要性的背景下进行了讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efb/5884539/5c6672efe6a1/pone.0195100.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efb/5884539/1f8228129fb2/pone.0195100.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efb/5884539/8726d46f1807/pone.0195100.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efb/5884539/6a5a3a1a2ef2/pone.0195100.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efb/5884539/0d7adc8b6ae2/pone.0195100.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efb/5884539/cad1441f0ede/pone.0195100.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efb/5884539/b97c8dacef9c/pone.0195100.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efb/5884539/b5a593cf85a9/pone.0195100.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efb/5884539/5c6672efe6a1/pone.0195100.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efb/5884539/1f8228129fb2/pone.0195100.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efb/5884539/8726d46f1807/pone.0195100.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efb/5884539/6a5a3a1a2ef2/pone.0195100.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efb/5884539/0d7adc8b6ae2/pone.0195100.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efb/5884539/cad1441f0ede/pone.0195100.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efb/5884539/b97c8dacef9c/pone.0195100.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efb/5884539/b5a593cf85a9/pone.0195100.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9efb/5884539/5c6672efe6a1/pone.0195100.g008.jpg

相似文献

1
How social exclusion modulates social information processing: A behavioural dissociation between facial expressions and gaze direction.社会排斥如何调节社会信息处理:面部表情和注视方向之间的行为分离。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 4;13(4):e0195100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195100. eCollection 2018.
2
Self-relevance appraisal of gaze direction and dynamic facial expressions: effects on facial electromyographic and autonomic reactions.注视方向和动态面部表情的自我相关性评估:对面部肌电图和自主反应的影响。
Emotion. 2013 Apr;13(2):330-7. doi: 10.1037/a0029892. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
3
Effects of Briefly Presented Masked Emotional Facial Expressions on Gaze Behavior: An Eye-Tracking Study.短暂呈现的掩蔽情绪面部表情对注视行为的影响:一项眼动追踪研究。
Psychol Rep. 2019 Aug;122(4):1432-1448. doi: 10.1177/0033294118789041. Epub 2018 Jul 22.
4
Social exclusion leads to attentional bias to emotional social information: Evidence from eye movement.社会排斥导致对情绪化社交信息的注意偏向:来自眼动的证据。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 17;12(10):e0186313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186313. eCollection 2017.
5
Gaze matters! The effect of gaze direction on emotional enhancement of memory for faces in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.注视很重要!注视方向对内侧颞叶癫痫患者面部记忆情绪增强的影响。
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Jul;72:35-38. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 May 30.
6
Integration of gaze direction and facial expression in patients with unilateral amygdala damage.单侧杏仁核损伤患者的注视方向与面部表情的整合。
Brain. 2010 Jan;133(Pt 1):248-61. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp255. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
7
Attentional mechanisms of social perception are biased in social phobia.社交恐惧症患者的社会认知注意机制存在偏差。
J Anxiety Disord. 2016 May;40:83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Apr 9.
8
The role of emotion in learning trustworthiness from eye-gaze: Evidence from facial electromyography.情绪在通过眼神注视学习可信度方面的作用:来自面部肌电图的证据。
Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jan-Oct;7(1-4):82-102. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2015.1085374. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
9
Face in profile view reduces perceived facial expression intensity: an eye-tracking study.侧面视角的面部会降低对面部表情强度的感知:一项眼动追踪研究。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Feb;155:19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.12.001. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
10
Age-related changes in the integration of gaze direction and facial expressions of emotion.年龄相关的注视方向和面部表情情绪整合变化。
Emotion. 2010 Aug;10(4):555-62. doi: 10.1037/a0019152.

引用本文的文献

1
Direct and averted gaze modulate the event-related brain responses to social exclusion signals.直接注视和回避注视会调节与事件相关的大脑对社会排斥信号的反应。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 18;15(1):13396. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97840-4.
2
Ostracism affects children's behavioral reactivity and gaze cueing of attention.排斥会影响儿童的行为反应和注意力的注视提示。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 26;20(3):e0320338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320338. eCollection 2025.
3
Influence of Social Exclusion on Cool and Hot Inhibitory Control in Chinese College Students.

本文引用的文献

1
The appeal of the devil's eye: social evaluation affects social attention.恶魔之眼的吸引力:社会评价影响社会注意力。
Cogn Process. 2017 Feb;18(1):97-103. doi: 10.1007/s10339-016-0785-2. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
2
Sex and gender affect the social brain: Beyond simplicity.性别影响社会大脑:超越简单层面。
J Neurosci Res. 2017 Jan 2;95(1-2):235-250. doi: 10.1002/jnr.23871. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
3
Are you looking my way? Ostracism widens the cone of gaze.你在看我这边吗?被排斥会扩大注视范围。
社会排斥对中国大学生冷、热抑制控制的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 30;20(3):2433. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032433.
4
Social exclusion increases the executive function of attention networks.社会排斥会增强注意力网络的执行功能。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 4;11(1):9494. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86385-x.
5
Neurobiobehavioral responses to virtual social rejection in females-exploring the influence of oxytocin.女性对虚拟社交排斥的神经生物学行为反应——探索催产素的影响。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Mar 5;16(3):326-333. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa168.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Aug;70(8):1713-1721. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1204327. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
4
The ordinal effects of ostracism: a meta-analysis of 120 Cyberball studies.排斥的序数效应:对120项网络投球研究的元分析。
PLoS One. 2015 May 29;10(5):e0127002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127002. eCollection 2015.
5
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
6
How do we update faces? Effects of gaze direction and facial expressions on working memory updating.我们如何更新面孔?注视方向和面部表情对面孔工作记忆更新的影响。
Front Psychol. 2012 Sep 27;3:362. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00362. eCollection 2012.
7
Out of the group, out of control? The brain responds to social exclusion with changes in cognitive control.被群体排斥,失控?大脑对社会排斥的反应是认知控制的变化。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Oct;8(7):789-94. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss071. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
8
A Practical Guide to Calculating Cohen's f(2), a Measure of Local Effect Size, from PROC MIXED.从PROC MIXED计算局部效应量指标科恩f(2)的实用指南。
Front Psychol. 2012 Apr 17;3:111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00111. eCollection 2012.
9
Social exclusion and pain sensitivity: why exclusion sometimes hurts and sometimes numbs.社会排斥与疼痛敏感性:为何排斥有时会带来伤害,有时又会带来麻木。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Feb;38(2):185-96. doi: 10.1177/0146167211422449. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
10
Automatic emotion regulation after social exclusion: tuning to positivity.社交排斥后的自动情绪调节:调谐至积极情绪。
Emotion. 2011 Jun;11(3):623-36. doi: 10.1037/a0023534.