• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作者、同行评审人员和读者:合作出版中对每个参与者有何期望?

Authors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing?

作者信息

Fernandez-Llimos Fernando

机构信息

PhD, MPharm, MBA. Editor-in-chief, Pharmacy Practice. Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Laboratory of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Porto . Porto ( Portugal ).

出版信息

Pharm Pract (Granada). 2021 Jan-Mar;19(1):2284. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2284. Epub 2021 Jan 14.

DOI:10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2284
PMID:33520041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7822057/
Abstract

Scholarly publishing is in a crisis, with the many stakeholders complaining about different aspects of the system. Authors want fast publication times, high visibility and publications in high-impact journals. Readers want freely accessible, high-quality articles. Peer reviewers want recognition for the work they perform to ensure the quality of the published articles. However, authors, peer reviewers, and readers are three different roles played by the same group of individuals, the users of the scholarly publishing system-and this system could work based on a collaborative publishing principle where "nobody pays, and nobody gets paid".

摘要

学术出版正处于危机之中,众多利益相关者都在抱怨该体系的不同方面。作者希望缩短出版时间、提高知名度并在高影响力期刊上发表文章。读者希望能免费获取高质量的文章。同行评审人员希望他们为确保已发表文章质量所做的工作得到认可。然而,作者、同行评审人员和读者是学术出版系统的同一批用户所扮演的三个不同角色,并且这个系统可以基于“无人付费,也无人获利”的协作出版原则来运行。

相似文献

1
Authors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing?作者、同行评审人员和读者:合作出版中对每个参与者有何期望?
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2021 Jan-Mar;19(1):2284. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2284. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
2
Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals.掠夺性期刊时代学术作者的最佳实践。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Feb;98(2):77-9. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0056.
3
Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.期刊中热门话题的影响因素及预测
Ultraschall Med. 2016 Aug;37(4):343-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-111209. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
4
Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers.学术出版依赖同行评审人员。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2018 Jan-Mar;16(1):1236. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
5
How many manuscripts should I peer review per year?我每年应该同行评审多少篇稿件?
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020 Jan-Mar;18(1):1804. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2020.1.1804. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
6
A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing.一个学术团体对出版的看法。
J Neurochem. 2016 Oct;139 Suppl 2:17-23. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13674. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
7
The bane of publishing a research article in international journals by African researchers, the peer-review process and the contentious issue of predatory journals: a commentary.非洲研究人员在国际期刊上发表研究文章的障碍、同行评审过程以及掠夺性期刊这一有争议的问题:一篇评论
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Mar 14;32:119. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.32.119.18351. eCollection 2019.
8
Peer review and publication delay.同行评审与出版延迟。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2019 Jan-Mar;17(1):1502. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2019.1.1502. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
9
Peer-review and publication of research protocols and proposals: a role for open access journals.研究方案和提案的同行评审与发表:开放获取期刊的作用
J Med Internet Res. 2004 Sep 30;6(3):e37. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e37.
10
'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.“掠夺性”开放获取:文章数量与市场特征的纵向研究
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 1;13:230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.

引用本文的文献

1
[Improving the Quality of Publications in and Advancing the Paradigms of Clinical and Social Pharmacy Practice Research: The Granada Statements].[提高临床与社会药学实践研究的出版物质量并推进其范式:格拉纳达声明]
Farm Comunitarios. 2023 Jun 23;15(3):31-38. doi: 10.33620/FC.2173-9218.(2023).23. eCollection 2023 Jul 15.
2
Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: the Granada Statements.提高临床和社会药学实践研究出版物的质量并推进其研究范式:格拉纳达声明。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Apr;45(2):285-292. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01550-8.
3
Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: the Granada Statements.提高临床和社会药学实践研究出版物的质量和推进范式:格拉纳达声明。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2024 Aug 22;31(5):483-488. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-003748.
4
Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: The Granada statements.提高临床与社会药学实践研究的出版物质量并推进其范式:格拉纳达声明
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 Mar 10;16(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00527-2.
5
Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: The Granada Statements.提高临床与社会药学实践研究领域的出版物质量并推进其范式发展:《格拉纳达声明》
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023 Jan 20;9:100229. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100229. eCollection 2023 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Standardization of pharmacy practice terminology and the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH).药学实践术语和医学主题词表(MeSH)的标准化。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Apr;17(4):819-820. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
2
Is my paper relevant for an international audience?我的论文对国际读者有相关性吗?
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020 Apr-Jun;18(2):1924. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2020.2.1924. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
3
How many manuscripts should I peer review per year?我每年应该同行评审多少篇稿件?
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020 Jan-Mar;18(1):1804. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2020.1.1804. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
4
Three opportunities for standardization: A literature review of the variation among pharmacists' patient care services terminology.标准化的三个机遇:药剂师患者护理服务术语差异的文献综述
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Jun;16(6):766-775. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.08.034. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
5
Peer review and publication delay.同行评审与出版延迟。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2019 Jan-Mar;17(1):1502. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2019.1.1502. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
6
Author misrepresentation of institutional affiliations: protocol for an exploratory case study.作者单位关系不当的描述:一项探索性案例研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 22;9(2):e023983. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023983.
7
Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers.学术出版依赖同行评审人员。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2018 Jan-Mar;16(1):1236. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
8
Collaborative publishing: the difference between 'gratis journals' and 'open access journals'.合作出版:“免费期刊”与“开放获取期刊”的区别
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2015 Jan-Mar;13(1):593. doi: 10.18549/pharmpract.2015.01.593.
9
Open access, predatory publishing and peer-review.开放获取、掠夺性出版与同行评审。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2014 Jan;12(1):427. doi: 10.4321/s1886-36552014000100001.
10
Pharmacy Practice suffered a plagiarism case.药学实践领域出现了一起抄袭事件。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2012 Jan;10(1):1-2. doi: 10.4321/s1886-36552012000100001.