Suppr超能文献

在重症监护病房和普通病房识别潜在可预防的药物不良事件时,与实验室异常相关的触发警报。

Trigger alerts associated with laboratory abnormalities on identifying potentially preventable adverse drug events in the intensive care unit and general ward.

作者信息

Buckley Mitchell S, Rasmussen Jeffrey R, Bikin Dale S, Richards Emily C, Berry Andrew J, Culver Mark A, Rivosecchi Ryan M, Kane-Gill Sandra L

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Banner University Medical Center Phoenix, 1111 E. McDowell Road, Phoenix, AZ 85006, USA.

Department of Pharmacy, Banner University Medical Center Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2018 Apr;9(4):207-217. doi: 10.1177/2042098618760995. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medication safety strategies involving trigger alerts have demonstrated potential in identifying drug-related hazardous conditions (DRHCs) and preventing adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. However, trigger alert effectiveness between intensive care unit (ICU) and general ward patients remains unknown. The objective was to investigate trigger alert performance in accurately identifying DRHCs associated with laboratory abnormalities in ICU and non-ICU settings.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study was conducted at a university hospital over a 1-year period involving 20 unique trigger alerts aimed at identifying possible drug-induced laboratory abnormalities. The primary outcome was to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) in distinguishing drug-induced abnormal laboratory values using trigger alerts in critically ill and general ward patients. Aberrant lab values attributed to medications without resulting in an actual adverse event ensuing were categorized as a DRHC.

RESULTS

A total of 634 patients involving 870 trigger alerts were included. The distribution of trigger alerts generated occurred more commonly in general ward patients (59.8%) than those in the ICU (40.2%). The overall PPV in detecting a DRHC in all hospitalized patients was 0.29, while the PPV in non-ICU patients (0.31) was significantly higher than the critically ill (0.25) ( = 0.03). However, the rate of DRHCs was significantly higher in the ICU than the general ward (7.49 0.87 events per 1000 patient days, respectively, < 0.0001). Although most DRHCs were considered mild or moderate in severity, more serious and life-threatening DRHCs occurred in the ICU compared with the general ward (39.8% 12.4%, respectively, < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, most trigger alerts performed poorly in detecting DRHCs irrespective of patient care setting. Continuous process improvement practices should be applied to trigger alert performance to improve clinician time efficiency and minimize alert fatigue.

摘要

背景

涉及触发警报的用药安全策略已显示出在识别药物相关危险状况(DRHCs)及预防住院患者药物不良事件方面的潜力。然而,重症监护病房(ICU)患者与普通病房患者之间触发警报的有效性仍不明确。目的是调查触发警报在准确识别ICU和非ICU环境中与实验室异常相关的DRHCs方面的表现。

方法

这项回顾性观察研究在一家大学医院进行,为期1年,涉及20种独特的触发警报,旨在识别可能由药物引起的实验室异常。主要结果是确定在重症患者和普通病房患者中使用触发警报区分药物引起的异常实验室值的阳性预测值(PPV)。归因于药物但未导致实际不良事件的异常实验室值被归类为DRHC。

结果

共纳入634例患者,涉及870次触发警报。触发警报的分布在普通病房患者中(59.8%)比在ICU患者中(40.2%)更常见。所有住院患者中检测到DRHC的总体PPV为0.29,而非ICU患者的PPV(0.31)显著高于重症患者(0.25)(P = 0.03)。然而,ICU中DRHC的发生率显著高于普通病房(分别为每1000患者日7.49±0.87次事件,P < 0.0001)。尽管大多数DRHC被认为严重程度为轻度或中度,但与普通病房相比,ICU中发生的更严重和危及生命的DRHC更多(分别为39.8%对12.4%,P < 0.001)。

结论

总体而言,无论患者护理环境如何,大多数触发警报在检测DRHC方面表现不佳。应将持续的流程改进措施应用于触发警报的性能,以提高临床医生的时间效率并尽量减少警报疲劳。

相似文献

7
Surgical intensive care - current and future challenges?外科重症监护——当前及未来的挑战?
Qatar Med J. 2020 Jan 13;2019(2):3. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.3. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Practice Guideline: Safe Medication Use in the ICU.临床实践指南:重症监护病房安全用药
Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep;45(9):e877-e915. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002533.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验