Department of Pulmonology, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, EPE, Portugal.
Department of Pulmonology, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, EPE, Portugal.
Pulmonology. 2018 Jul-Aug;24(4):224-230. doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2017.12.006. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
Tracheal stenosis is a rare and challenging disease. Bronchoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis and assessment but brings inherent risks. Spirometry is commonly used to access obstructions but is not always feasible due to patient related factors. We therefore considered impulse oscillometry (IOS) as a non-invasive method to quantify airway obstruction and its potential use for diagnosis and follow-up of tracheal stenosis.
Patients with confirmed tracheal stenosis were recruited between January 1st, 2015 and December 31st, 2016. Before bronchoscopy, all subjects underwent IOS and spirometry; for patients submitted to interventional bronchoscopy the same techniques were also performed after the procedure. We assessed the correlation between IOS measurements and airway narrowing as well as between IOS and spirometry values.
Twenty-one patients were included. Tracheal narrowing was inversely correlated with X5% (r -0.442, p 0.045) and positively correlated with FEV1/PEF (r 0.467, p 0.033). The stenosis length was inversely correlated with PEF and PEF% (r -0.729, p=0.001 and r -0.707, p=0.002, respectively). There was a strong correlation between spirometric and IOS values. We did not find any significant differences between pre- and post-intervention IOS values for patients assessed after interventional bronchoscopy.
Our study showed a weak correlation between X5% and tracheal narrowing making it unclear whether IOS can be used for physiological assessment of patients with tracheal stenosis. Stenosis length correlated with PEF making it a potential predictor of successful surgical approach. The correlation between IOS and spirometric values makes IOS a potential alternative in patients with suspected tracheal stenosis who are not able to perform spirometry. Larger scale studies should clarify the role of IOS in this pathology.
气管狭窄是一种罕见且具有挑战性的疾病。支气管镜检查是诊断和评估的金标准,但会带来固有风险。肺量测定法常用于评估气道阻塞,但由于患者相关因素,并非总是可行。因此,我们考虑使用脉冲震荡(IOS)作为一种量化气道阻塞的非侵入性方法,并评估其在气管狭窄的诊断和随访中的潜在用途。
2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间,我们招募了确诊为气管狭窄的患者。在支气管镜检查之前,所有患者均接受 IOS 和肺量测定法检查;对于接受介入性支气管镜检查的患者,在检查后也同样进行了这些技术的检查。我们评估了 IOS 测量值与气道狭窄之间以及 IOS 和肺量测定法值之间的相关性。
共纳入 21 例患者。气管狭窄与 X5%呈负相关(r=-0.442,p=0.045),与 FEV1/PEF 呈正相关(r=0.467,p=0.033)。狭窄长度与 PEF 和 PEF%呈负相关(r=-0.729,p=0.001 和 r=-0.707,p=0.002)。IOS 值和肺量测定法值之间存在很强的相关性。在接受介入性支气管镜检查的患者中,我们未发现检查前后 IOS 值之间有任何显著差异。
我们的研究显示 X5%与气管狭窄之间的相关性较弱,这使得 IOS 是否可用于气管狭窄患者的生理评估仍不清楚。狭窄长度与 PEF 相关,这使其成为手术成功的潜在预测因素。IOS 值与肺量测定法值之间的相关性使 IOS 成为无法进行肺量测定法的疑似气管狭窄患者的潜在替代方法。更大规模的研究应阐明 IOS 在该病理中的作用。