• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高被引临床医生在社交网站上时会获得更多引用吗?

Do highly cited clinicians get more citations when being present at social networking sites?

作者信息

Ramezani-Pakpour-Langeroudi Fatemeh, Okhovati Maryam, Talebian Ali

机构信息

Medical Biotechnology Research Center, School of Nursing, Midwifery and paramedicine, Guilan, University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

Department of Medical Library and Information, School of Management and Medical Information Sciences, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

出版信息

J Educ Health Promot. 2018 Feb 9;7:18. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_69_17. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_69_17
PMID:29629379
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5852979/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The advent of social networking sites has facilitated the dissemination of scientific research. This article aims to investigate the presence of Iranian highly cited clinicians in social networking sites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a scientometrics study. Essential Science Indicator (ESI) was searched for Iranian highly cited papers in clinical medicine during November-December 2015. Then, the authors of the papers were checked and a list of authors was obtained. In the second phase, the authors' names were searched in the selected social networking sites (ResearchGate [RG], Academia, Mendeley, LinkedIn). The total citations and h-index in Scopus were also gathered.

RESULTS

Fifty-five highly cited papers were retrieved. A total of 107 authors participated in writing these papers. RG was the most popular (64.5%) and LinkedIn and Academia were in 2 and 3 places. None of the authors of highly cited papers were subscribed to Mendeley. A positive direct relationship was observed between visibility at social networking sites with citation and h-index rate. A significant relationship was observed between the RG score, citations, reads indicators in RG, and citation numbers and there was a significant relationship between the number of document indicator in Academia and the citation numbers.

CONCLUSION

It seems putting the papers in social networking sites can influence the citation rate. We recommend all scientists to be present at social networking sites to have better chance of visibility and also citation.

摘要

背景与目的

社交网站的出现促进了科学研究的传播。本文旨在调查伊朗高被引临床医生在社交网站上的情况。

材料与方法

这是一项科学计量学研究。在2015年11月至12月期间,通过基本科学指标(ESI)搜索伊朗临床医学领域的高被引论文。然后,对论文作者进行核对,获得作者名单。在第二阶段,在选定的社交网站(ResearchGate [RG]、Academia、Mendeley、领英)上搜索作者姓名。还收集了Scopus中的总被引次数和h指数。

结果

检索到55篇高被引论文。共有107位作者参与撰写这些论文。RG是最受欢迎的(64.5%),领英和Academia分别位列第二和第三。高被引论文的作者中无人订阅Mendeley。社交网站上的知名度与被引率和h指数率之间存在正相关的直接关系。RG评分、RG中的被引次数、阅读量指标与被引次数之间存在显著关系,Academia中的文献数量指标与被引次数之间也存在显著关系。

结论

似乎将论文发布在社交网站上会影响被引率。我们建议所有科学家都参与社交网站,以获得更好的知名度和被引机会。

相似文献

1
Do highly cited clinicians get more citations when being present at social networking sites?高被引临床医生在社交网站上时会获得更多引用吗?
J Educ Health Promot. 2018 Feb 9;7:18. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_69_17. eCollection 2018.
2
Evaluation of Scientific Outputs of Kashan University of Medical Sciences in Scopus Citation Database based on Scopus, ResearchGate, and Mendeley Scientometric Measures.基于Scopus、ResearchGate和Mendeley科学计量指标对库姆医科大学在Scopus引文数据库中的科研产出进行评估。
Electron Physician. 2016 Feb 25;8(2):2048-56. doi: 10.19082/2048. eCollection 2016 Feb.
3
Scientific output quality of 40 globally top-ranked medical researchers in the field of osteoporosis.骨质疏松症领域全球排名前 40 位的医学研究人员的科研产出质量。
Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Mar 26;13(1):35. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0446-4.
4
[The citation analysis of the publications in Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine from 2014 to 2017].《2014年至2017年《中华预防医学杂志》发表论文的引文分析》
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Aug 6;54(8):867-874. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20200614-00876.
5
Critical assessment of progress of medical sciences in Iran and Turkey: the way developing countries with limited resources should make effective contributions to the production of science.伊朗和土耳其医学科学进展的批判性评估:资源有限的发展中国家为科学产出做出有效贡献的途径。
Arch Iran Med. 2011 Nov;14(6):370-7.
6
Which articles and which topics in the forensic sciences are most highly cited?法医学领域中哪些文章和哪些主题被引用得最多?
Sci Justice. 2005 Oct-Dec;45(4):175-82. doi: 10.1016/S1355-0306(05)71661-0.
7
Gender differences in professional social media use among anaesthesia researchers.麻醉研究人员专业社交媒体使用中的性别差异。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Mar;124(3):e178-e184. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.030. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
8
Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines.跨学科的多种引用指标及其综合指标
PLoS Biol. 2016 Jul 1;14(7):e1002501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002501. eCollection 2016 Jul.
9
The fifty highest cited papers in anterior cruciate ligament injury.前交叉韧带损伤领域被引用次数最多的五十篇论文。
Int Orthop. 2017 Jul;41(7):1405-1412. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3513-3. Epub 2017 May 27.
10
Exploring the clinical translation intensity of papers published by the world's top scientists in basic medicine.探索世界顶尖基础医学科学家发表论文的临床转化强度。
Scientometrics. 2023;128(4):2371-2416. doi: 10.1007/s11192-023-04634-4. Epub 2023 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the impact of history of medicine research: A scientometric and altmetric analysis.评估医学史研究的影响:一项科学计量学与替代计量学分析。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2186. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2186. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
The h-Index: Understanding its predictors, significance, and criticism.h指数:了解其预测因素、意义及批评意见。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2023 Nov;12(11):2531-2537. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1613_23. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
3
A comparative study of scientific collaborations in medical informatics, health information management, medical librarianship, and information sciences among Iranian research communities: A bibliometric study.伊朗研究群体中医学信息学、健康信息管理、医学图书馆学和信息科学领域科学合作的比较研究:一项文献计量学研究
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 9;6(8):e1474. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1474. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
#Ophthalmology: Social Media Utilization and Impact in Ophthalmology Journals, Professional Societies, and Eye Health Organizations.眼科:社交媒体在眼科期刊、专业协会及眼健康组织中的应用与影响
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep 3;16:2989-3001. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S378795. eCollection 2022.
5
Visualization of knowledge flow in interpersonal scientific collaboration network endocrinology and metabolism research institute.人际科学合作网络内分泌与代谢研究所中的知识流动可视化。
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2020 Oct 1;20(1):815-823. doi: 10.1007/s40200-020-00644-8. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
The Use of Social Media to Increase the Impact of Health Research: Systematic Review.利用社交媒体提高健康研究的影响力:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 6;22(7):e15607. doi: 10.2196/15607.
7
Immunology and social networks: an approach towards impact assessment.免疫学与社交网络:影响评估方法
Rheumatol Int. 2020 Feb;40(2):251-256. doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04459-6. Epub 2019 Oct 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Research Performance Measures and the Moderating Role of Faculty Characteristics in Epidemiology.研究绩效指标及教师特征在流行病学中的调节作用
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Sep 2;8(5):72-80. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n5p72.
2
Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network.在线协作:科学家与社交网络
Nature. 2014 Aug 14;512(7513):126-9. doi: 10.1038/512126a.
3
Highly cited publications in pediatric neurosurgery: part 2.小儿神经外科领域的高被引出版物:第2部分。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2013 Dec;29(12):2215-28. doi: 10.1007/s00381-013-2293-3. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
4
A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication.医疗保健的一个新维度:社交媒体用于健康传播的用途、益处及局限性的系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Apr 23;15(4):e85. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1933.
5
Reviewing social media use by clinicians.审查临床医生的社交媒体使用情况。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):777-81. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000990. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
6
Social media and the health system.社交媒体与卫生系统。
Perm J. 2011 Winter;15(1):71-4. doi: 10.7812/TPP/10-154.
7
100 most cited articles in orthopaedic surgery.100 篇最具引用价值的矫形外科论文。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 May;469(5):1487-97. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1604-1. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
8
Highly cited works in neurosurgery. Part II: the citation classics.神经外科学高引文献。第二部分:引文经典。
J Neurosurg. 2010 Feb;112(2):233-46. doi: 10.3171/2009.12.JNS091600.
9
Highly cited works in neurosurgery. Part I: the 100 top-cited papers in neurosurgical journals.神经外科高引文献。第一部分:神经外科学期刊 100 篇高引论文。
J Neurosurg. 2010 Feb;112(2):223-32. doi: 10.3171/2009.12.JNS091599.
10
Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact.文章层面的指标与科学影响力的演变。
PLoS Biol. 2009 Nov;7(11):e1000242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000242. Epub 2009 Nov 17.