Chavarriaga Ricardo, Fried-Oken Melanie, Kleih Sonja, Lotte Fabien, Scherer Reinhold
Defitech Chair in Brain-Machine Interface (CNBI), Center for Neuroprosthetics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland.
Oregon Health & Science University, Institute on Development and Disability, Portland, Oregon USA.
Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon). 2017;4(1-2):60-73. doi: 10.1080/2326263X.2016.1263916. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
Research in brain-computer interfaces has achieved impressive progress towards implementing assistive technologies for restoration or substitution of lost motor capabilities, as well as supporting technologies for able-bodied subjects. Notwithstanding this progress, effective translation of these interfaces from proof-of concept prototypes into reliable applications remains elusive. As a matter of fact, most of the current BCI systems cannot be used independently for long periods of time by their intended end-users. Multiple factors that impair achieving this goal have already been identified. However, it is not clear how do they affect the overall BCI performance or how they should be tackled. This is worsened by the publication bias where only positive results are disseminated, preventing the research community from learning from its errors. This paper is the result of a workshop held at the 6th International BCI meeting in Asilomar. We summarize here the discussion on concrete research avenues and guidelines that may help overcoming common pitfalls and make BCIs become a useful alternative communication device.
脑机接口的研究在实现用于恢复或替代丧失运动能力的辅助技术以及为身体健全的受试者提供支持技术方面取得了令人瞩目的进展。尽管取得了这一进展,但将这些接口从概念验证原型有效转化为可靠应用仍然难以实现。事实上,大多数当前的脑机接口系统无法被其预期的最终用户长时间独立使用。已经确定了多个妨碍实现这一目标的因素。然而,尚不清楚它们如何影响脑机接口的整体性能,或者应如何应对这些因素。仅传播积极结果的发表偏倚使情况变得更糟,这阻碍了研究界从错误中吸取教训。本文是在阿西洛马举行的第六届国际脑机接口会议上举办的一次研讨会的成果。我们在此总结了关于具体研究途径和指导方针的讨论,这些途径和方针可能有助于克服常见陷阱,并使脑机接口成为一种有用的替代通信设备。