Martela Frank, Pessi Anne B
Faculty of Theology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 26;9:363. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00363. eCollection 2018.
Research on meaningful work has proliferated in recent years, with an increasing understanding of the centrality of meaningfulness for work-related motivation, commitment, and well-being. However, ambiguity around the main construct, "meaningful work," has hindered this progress as various researchers have used partly overlapping, partly differing conceptualizations. To bring clarity to this issue, we examine a broad range of various definitions of meaningful work and come to argue that meaningfulness in the broadest sense is about as an overall evaluation of work as regards whether it is intrinsically valuable and worth doing. Furthermore, we argue that there are two key sub-dimensions to this work significance: as work serving some greater good or prosocial goals (the intrinsic value of work beyond the person in question). And as a sense of autonomy, authenticity and self-expression at work (the intrinsic value of work for the person in question). Previous definitions of meaningful work feature typically one or two of these elements-significance, broader purpose, self-realization -, but in the future it would be beneficial to clearly acknowledge all three elements in both definitions and operationalizations of meaningful work.
近年来,关于有意义工作的研究大量涌现,人们越来越认识到意义对于与工作相关的动机、投入度和幸福感的核心地位。然而,围绕主要概念“有意义的工作”存在的模糊性阻碍了这一进展,因为不同的研究者使用了部分重叠、部分不同的概念化方式。为了澄清这个问题,我们考察了关于有意义工作的广泛多样的定义,并认为从最广泛的意义上讲,意义是对工作是否具有内在价值以及是否值得去做的一种总体评价。此外,我们认为这种工作意义有两个关键子维度:一是工作服务于某种更大的利益或亲社会目标(工作对于相关人员之外的内在价值);二是工作中的自主感、真实感和自我表达(工作对于相关人员自身的内在价值)。以往关于有意义工作的定义通常只包含这些要素中的一两个——意义、更广泛的目标、自我实现——但在未来,在有意义工作的定义和操作化过程中明确承认所有这三个要素将是有益的。