Price David, Walker Tomas
Dexcom, Inc., San Diego, California, US.
Eur Endocrinol. 2016 Mar;12(1):24-30. doi: 10.17925/EE.2016.12.01.24. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is now recognised as a core component of diabetes self-management. However, there are many limitations to SMBG use in individuals with diabetes who are treated with intensive insulin regimens. Many individuals do not test at the recommended frequencies. Additionally, because SMBG only provides a blood glucose reading at a single point in time, hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia can easily go undetected, limiting the user's ability to take corrective action. Inaccuracies due to user error, environmental factors and weaknesses in SMBG system integrity further limit the utility of SMBG. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) displays the current glucose, direction and velocity of glucose change and provides programmable alarms. This trending information and 'around-the-clock' vigilance provides a significant safety advantage relative to SMBG. No published clinical studies have evaluated outcomes when CGM is used as a replacement for SMBG; however, recent in silico studies support this indication. This article reviews the limitations of SMBG and discusses recent evidence that supports CGM-based decisions as an effective approach to managing insulin-treated diabetes.
血糖自我监测(SMBG)现已被视为糖尿病自我管理的核心组成部分。然而,对于接受强化胰岛素治疗方案的糖尿病患者,使用SMBG存在诸多局限性。许多患者未按推荐频率进行检测。此外,由于SMBG仅能提供某一时刻的血糖读数,低血糖和高血糖很容易被漏检,从而限制了使用者采取纠正措施的能力。用户操作失误以及环境因素导致的不准确,加上SMBG系统完整性方面的缺陷,进一步限制了SMBG的效用。实时连续血糖监测(CGM)可显示当前血糖值、血糖变化的方向和速度,并提供可编程警报。相对于SMBG,这种趋势信息和“全天候”监测具有显著的安全优势。尚无已发表的临床研究评估将CGM用作SMBG替代方法时的结果;然而,近期的计算机模拟研究支持这一应用指征。本文回顾了SMBG的局限性,并讨论了近期证据,这些证据支持基于CGM的决策作为管理胰岛素治疗糖尿病的有效方法。