Endocrinology Center of Southwest Louisiana, Lake Charles, Louisiana, USA.
Dexcom, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Mar;23(S1):S35-S39. doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0666.
Initiating continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can affect hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and patients' relationship with their diabetes. We used real-world HbA1c data to quantify short-term changes in glycemia and validated psychosocial questionnaires to assess changes in quality-of-life indicators in people during their first few months of CGM use. Eligibility was assessed during calls to Dexcom sales regarding its G6 CGM System. Eligibility criteria included ages 25-65 years, type 1 (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) on intensive insulin therapy (IIT), and no prior CGM use. Participants used a web-based portal to complete the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) and the 14-item Hypoglycemia Attitudes and Behavior Scale (HABS); provided validated HbA1c measurements; and shared their CGM data pre- and 3-5 months post-CGM initiation. Satisfaction and ease of use with the G6 System were also assessed. Data were available from 248 patients (182 with T1D, 66 with T2D; 57% male, 88% non-Hispanic white). Mean (standard deviation) HbA1c fell significantly from 8.2% (1.9%) at baseline to 7.1% (1.1%) at the end of the study ( < 0.001); more than half (54.4%) of those with initial HbA1c values >7% experienced absolute HbA1c reductions of >1%. Significant reductions in diabetes distress (DDS) and hypoglycemic concerns (HABS) were observed ( < 0.001). Most (93%) participants were satisfied or very satisfied with the G6 System and 73% found it very easy to use. The first 3 months of CGM use was correlated with improvements in psychosocial outcomes and improved HbA1c levels for people with T1D or T2D who use IIT.
启动连续血糖监测(CGM)可能会影响血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)水平和患者的糖尿病管理。我们使用真实世界的 HbA1c 数据来量化血糖的短期变化,并验证了心理社会调查问卷,以评估人们在使用 CGM 的最初几个月内生活质量指标的变化。在 Dexcom 销售电话中评估了合格性,涉及 G6 CGM 系统。合格标准包括年龄在 25-65 岁之间、1 型(T1D)或 2 型糖尿病(T2D)正在接受强化胰岛素治疗(IIT)、且无 CGM 使用史的患者。参与者使用基于网络的门户完成 17 项糖尿病困扰量表(DDS)和 14 项低血糖态度和行为量表(HABS);提供经验证的 HbA1c 测量值;并在 CGM 开始前和 3-5 个月后分享 CGM 数据。还评估了对 G6 系统的满意度和易用性。从 248 名患者(182 名 T1D,66 名 T2D;57%为男性,88%为非西班牙裔白人)中获得了数据。HbA1c 的平均值(标准差)从基线时的 8.2%(1.9%)显著下降到研究结束时的 7.1%(1.1%)( < 0.001);超过一半(54.4%)初始 HbA1c 值大于 7%的患者的 HbA1c 绝对值降低了大于 1%。糖尿病困扰(DDS)和低血糖担忧(HABS)显著降低( < 0.001)。大多数(93%)参与者对 G6 系统感到满意或非常满意,73%的人发现它非常易于使用。CGM 使用的前 3 个月与 1 型或 2 型糖尿病患者的心理社会结局改善和 HbA1c 水平改善相关,这些患者正在接受 IIT。