Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Center/11ACSLG, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, 950 Campbell Avenue, West Haven, CT, 06516, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 May;33(Suppl 1):54-60. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4322-0.
Despite strong evidence for the effectiveness of non-pharmacological pain treatment modalities (NPMs), little is known about the prevalence or correlates of NPM use.
This study examined rates and correlates of NPM use in a sample of veterans who served during recent conflicts.
We examined rates and demographic and clinical correlates of self-reported NPM use (operationalized as psychological/behavioral therapies, exercise/movement therapies, and manual therapies). We calculated descriptive statistics and examined bivariate associations and multivariable associations using logistic regression.
Participants were 460 veterans endorsing pain lasting ≥ 3 months who completed the baseline survey of the Women Veterans Cohort Study (response rate 7.7%.
Outcome was self-reported use of NPMs in the past 12 months.
Veterans were 33.76 years old (SD = 10.72), 56.3% female, and 80.2% White. Regarding NPM use, 22.6% reported using psychological/behavioral, 50.9% used exercise/movement and 51.7% used manual therapies. Veterans with a college degree (vs. no degree; OR = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.46, 4.30, p = 0.001) or those with worse mental health symptoms (OR = 2.88, 95% CI = 2.11, 3.93, p < 0.001) were more likely to use psychological/behavioral therapies. Veterans who were female (OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.43, 0.93, p = 0.02) or who used non-opioid pain medications (OR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.146, 2.84, p = 0.009) were more likely to use exercise/movement therapies. Veterans who were non-White (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.5, 0.94, p = 0.03), with greater educational attainment (OR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.42, 3.15, p < 0.001), or who used non-opioid pain medication (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.09, 2.68, p = 0.02) were more likely to use manual therapies.
Results identified demographic and clinical characteristics among different NPMs, which may indicate differences in veteran treatment preferences or provider referral patterns. Further study of provider referral patterns and veteran treatment preferences is needed to inform interventions to increase NPM utilization. Research is also need to identify demographic and clinical correlates of clinical outcomes related to NPM use.
尽管非药物性疼痛治疗方法(NPM)的有效性有确凿的证据,但人们对 NPM 使用的流行程度或相关性知之甚少。
本研究调查了最近冲突期间服役的退伍军人样本中 NPM 使用的比率和相关性。
我们检查了自我报告的 NPM 使用率(定义为心理/行为疗法、运动/运动疗法和手动疗法)和人口统计学及临床相关性。我们计算了描述性统计数据,并使用逻辑回归检查了双变量关联和多变量关联。
完成妇女退伍军人队列研究基线调查的 460 名疼痛持续时间≥3 个月的退伍军人(应答率为 7.7%)。
结果是过去 12 个月内自我报告的 NPM 使用情况。
退伍军人年龄为 33.76 岁(SD=10.72),56.3%为女性,80.2%为白人。关于 NPM 的使用,22.6%的人报告使用了心理/行为疗法,50.9%的人使用了运动/运动疗法,51.7%的人使用了手动疗法。与没有学位的退伍军人相比,具有大学学历的退伍军人(OR=2.51,95%CI=1.46,4.30,p=0.001)或心理健康症状更严重的退伍军人(OR=2.88,95%CI=2.11,3.93,p<0.001)更有可能使用心理/行为疗法。女性退伍军人(OR=0.63,95%CI=0.43,0.93,p=0.02)或使用非阿片类止痛药的退伍军人(OR=1.82,95%CI=1.146,2.84,p=0.009)更有可能使用运动/运动疗法。非白人退伍军人(OR=0.57,95%CI=0.50,0.94,p=0.03)、教育程度更高的退伍军人(OR=2.11,95%CI=1.42,3.15,p<0.001)或使用非阿片类止痛药的退伍军人(OR=1.71,95%CI=1.09,2.68,p=0.02)更有可能使用手动疗法。
研究结果确定了不同 NPM 之间的人口统计学和临床特征,这可能表明退伍军人治疗偏好或提供者转介模式的差异。需要进一步研究提供者转介模式和退伍军人治疗偏好,以提供信息来增加 NPM 的使用。还需要研究与 NPM 使用相关的临床结果的人口统计学和临床相关性。