Suppr超能文献

“对整个系统感到沮丧”:对寻求慢性疼痛治疗服务的人群所面临问题的定性框架分析。

"Frustrated with the whole system": a qualitative framework analysis of the issues faced by people accessing health services for chronic pain.

机构信息

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, 22-32 King Street Randwick, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.

School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Sir Fred Schonell Drive St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 31;22(1):1603. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08946-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is complex and often requires multimodal management comprising of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. To inform delivery of CNCP management, it is important to understand how current health services providing non-pharmacological treatments are accessed by exploring the experiences of people attempting to access services. In doing so, this study sought to explore the underlying drivers of service access barriers.

METHODS

This study explored the experiences of Australians accessing services for CNCP using semi-structured telephone interviews undertaken between 01 October 2020 and 31 March 2021. Thematic analysis was guided by Levesque et al.'s 2013 conceptual framework of access to health care, with emerging themes mapped to five dimensions of accessibility and corresponding abilities of consumers: Approachability/Ability to perceive; Acceptability/Ability to seek; Availability and Accommodation/Ability to reach; Affordability/Ability to pay; and Appropriateness/Ability to engage.

RESULTS

The 26 participants (aged 24-78 years, 22 female) reported accessing a range of services including general practitioners (GP), allied health services, and specialised pain clinics, for a variety of conditions. Three themes were mapped to accessibility dimensions (in brackets): 'GP as guide or gatekeeper' (Approachability); 'Outside of my control' (Availability and Accommodation; Affordability); and 'Services aren't always good enough' (Appropriateness). A fourth identified theme illustrated how participants responded to encountering these barriers: 'Leading my own pain management'. Participant experiences suggest problems with the translation of contemporary pain management principles into practice, including continued application of biomedical health models as opposed to the biopsychosocial model, and demonstrate systemic issues with service delivery, including a lack of benchmarking of specialised services.

CONCLUSIONS

The identified themes highlight several evidence-to-practice gaps in the delivery of health services for people with CNCP in Australia. To address these gaps, there is a need for improved clinician training, increased investment in specialised pain services, and development of clear primary care pathways for CNCP management for evidence-based multimodal pain management to be accessible and equitable.

摘要

背景

慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)较为复杂,通常需要包括药物和非药物治疗在内的多模式管理。为了为 CNCP 管理提供信息,了解当前提供非药物治疗的卫生服务是如何被人们所利用的,探索他们在利用服务过程中遇到的问题非常重要。为此,本研究旨在探讨服务获取障碍的根本驱动因素。

方法

本研究通过 2020 年 10 月 1 日至 2021 年 3 月 31 日进行的半结构式电话访谈,探索了澳大利亚人获取 CNCP 服务的经历。主题分析以 Levesque 等人 2013 年的卫生保健获取概念框架为指导,将新兴主题映射到可及性的五个维度和消费者的相应能力上:可接近性/感知能力;可接受性/寻求能力;可及性和适应性/可达能力;可负担性/支付能力;适宜性/参与能力。

结果

26 名参与者(年龄 24-78 岁,22 名女性)报告说,他们为各种疾病,使用包括全科医生(GP)、辅助医疗服务和专门的疼痛诊所等一系列服务。三个主题被映射到可及性维度(括号内):“GP 作为指导或守门人”(可接近性);“超出我的控制范围”(可及性和适应性;可负担性);“服务并不总是足够好”(适宜性)。第四个确定的主题说明了参与者如何应对这些障碍:“主导我自己的疼痛管理”。参与者的经历表明,在将当代疼痛管理原则转化为实践方面存在一些问题,包括继续应用生物医学健康模型而不是生物心理社会模型,以及在服务提供方面存在系统性问题,包括缺乏专门服务的基准测试。

结论

确定的主题突出了澳大利亚慢性非癌性疼痛患者健康服务提供方面的几个证据与实践之间的差距。为了解决这些差距,需要改善临床医生的培训,增加对专门疼痛服务的投资,以及制定明确的慢性非癌性疼痛管理初级保健途径,以实现基于证据的多模式疼痛管理的可及性和公平性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01a5/9804951/fb24e81a1acd/12913_2022_8946_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验