• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在院前血液制品输血研究中运用倾向评分分析:经验教训与迈向最佳实践

Utilizing Propensity Score Analyses in Prehospital Blood Product Transfusion Studies: Lessons Learned and Moving Toward Best Practice.

作者信息

Greene Thomas J, DeSantis Stacia M, Fox Erin E, Wade Charles E, Holcomb John B, Swartz Michael D

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 1200 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030.

Center for Translational Injury Research, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6410 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030.

出版信息

Mil Med. 2018 Mar 1;183(suppl_1):124-133. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usx137.

DOI:10.1093/milmed/usx137
PMID:29635550
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6020820/
Abstract

Recently, observational studies analyzing prehospital blood product transfusions (PHT) for trauma have become more widespread in both military and civilian communities. Due to these studies' non-random treatment assignment, propensity score (PS) methodologies are often used to determine an intervention's effectiveness. However, there are no guidelines on how to appropriately conduct PS analyses in prehospital studies. Such analyses are complicated when treatments are given in emergent settings as the ability to administer treatment early, often before hospital admission, can interfere with assumptions of PS modeling. This study conducts a systematic review of literature from military and civilian populations to assess current practice of PS methodology in PHT analyses. The decision-making process from the multicenter Prehospital Resuscitation on Helicopter Study (PROHS) is discussed and used as a motivating example. Results show that researchers often omit or incorrectly assess variable balance between treatment groups and include inappropriate variables in the propensity model. When used correctly, PS methodology is an effective statistical technique to show that aggressive en route resuscitation strategies, including PHT, can reduce mortality in individuals with severe trauma. This review provides guidelines for best practices in study design and analyses that will advance trauma care.

摘要

最近,分析创伤患者院前血液制品输注(PHT)的观察性研究在军事和 civilian 社区中都变得更加普遍。由于这些研究的非随机治疗分配,倾向评分(PS)方法经常被用来确定干预措施的有效性。然而,对于如何在院前研究中适当地进行 PS 分析,目前尚无指南。当在紧急情况下进行治疗时,此类分析会变得复杂,因为在医院入院前尽早进行治疗的能力可能会干扰 PS 建模的假设。本研究对来自军事和 civilian 人群的文献进行了系统综述,以评估 PHT 分析中 PS 方法的当前实践。多中心直升机院前复苏研究(PROHS)的决策过程将被讨论并用作一个激励性的例子。结果表明,研究人员经常忽略或错误评估治疗组之间的变量平衡,并在倾向模型中纳入不适当的变量。如果正确使用,PS 方法是一种有效的统计技术,可表明包括 PHT 在内的积极的途中复苏策略可以降低严重创伤患者的死亡率。本综述为研究设计和分析的最佳实践提供了指南,这将推动创伤护理的发展。 (注:原文中“civilian”未翻译完整,推测可能是“平民”等意思,你可根据实际情况补充完整。)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d373/6490292/e6a905d41c17/usx137f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d373/6490292/00f558a5b408/usx137f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d373/6490292/e34aeff55e08/usx137f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d373/6490292/aa8fb5b981b1/usx137f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d373/6490292/e6a905d41c17/usx137f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d373/6490292/00f558a5b408/usx137f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d373/6490292/e34aeff55e08/usx137f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d373/6490292/aa8fb5b981b1/usx137f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d373/6490292/e6a905d41c17/usx137f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Utilizing Propensity Score Analyses in Prehospital Blood Product Transfusion Studies: Lessons Learned and Moving Toward Best Practice.在院前血液制品输血研究中运用倾向评分分析:经验教训与迈向最佳实践
Mil Med. 2018 Mar 1;183(suppl_1):124-133. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usx137.
2
Multicenter observational prehospital resuscitation on helicopter study.直升机多中心院前复苏观察性研究
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jul;83(1 Suppl 1):S83-S91. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001484.
3
Prehospital whole blood reduces early mortality in patients with hemorrhagic shock.院前输注全血可降低失血性休克患者的早期死亡率。
Transfusion. 2021 Jul;61 Suppl 1:S15-S21. doi: 10.1111/trf.16528.
4
Are on-scene blood transfusions by a helicopter emergency medical service useful and safe? A multicentre case-control study.直升机紧急医疗服务现场输血是否有用且安全?一项多中心病例对照研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Apr;26(2):128-132. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000516.
5
The effects of prehospital plasma on patients with injury: a prehospital plasma resuscitation.院前输注血浆对创伤患者的影响:一项院前血浆复苏研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Aug;73(2 Suppl 1):S49-53. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31826060ff.
6
What is the impact of prehospital blood product administration for patients with catastrophic haemorrhage: an integrative review.院前血液制品输注对灾难性出血患者的影响:一项综合综述
Injury. 2019 Feb;50(2):226-234. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.11.049. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
7
Prehospital fluid resuscitation in hypotensive trauma patients: do we need a tailored approach?低血压创伤患者的院前液体复苏:我们是否需要一种个性化的方法?
Injury. 2015 Jan;46(1):4-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
8
Prehospital administration of blood products: experiences from a Finnish physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service.院前血制品的使用:来自芬兰配备医师的直升机紧急医疗服务的经验。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 7;20(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00350-x.
9
Indication Bias Explains Some of the Observed Increased Mortality Associated With Use of Prehospital Intravenous Fluids in a Pediatric Trauma Population.指征偏倚解释了在儿科创伤人群中观察到的与院前静脉输液使用相关的死亡率增加的部分原因。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Jan;23(1):83-92. doi: 10.1111/acem.12841. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
10
Prehospital Blood Product Resuscitation for Trauma: A Systematic Review.创伤院前血液制品复苏:一项系统评价
Shock. 2016 Jul;46(1):3-16. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000569.

引用本文的文献

1
Multicentre observational study on practice of prehospital management of hypotensive trauma patients: the SPITFIRE study protocol.多中心观察性研究:关于低血压创伤患者院前管理实践的研究:SPITFIRE 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 30;12(5):e062097. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062097.
2
Whole blood transfusion versus component therapy in trauma resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.创伤复苏中全血输注与成分输血治疗的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 May 29;1(4):633-641. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12089. eCollection 2020 Aug.
3
Interim monitoring of nonrandomized prospective studies that invoke propensity scoring for decision making.

本文引用的文献

1
Multicenter observational prehospital resuscitation on helicopter study.直升机多中心院前复苏观察性研究
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jul;83(1 Suppl 1):S83-S91. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001484.
2
Blood transfusion: In the air tonight?输血:今晚在空中?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Jul;81(1):15-20. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001045.
3
Articles That May Change Your Practice: Prehospital Blood Products.
Air Med J. 2015 Nov-Dec;34(6):317-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2015.08.002.
对采用倾向评分进行决策的非随机前瞻性研究的中期监测。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Feb;88(2):e46-e52. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002474.
4
Elicitation of prior probability distributions for a proposed Bayesian randomized clinical trial of whole blood for trauma resuscitation.提出的贝叶斯随机临床试验中全血用于创伤复苏的先验概率分布的启发式方法。
Transfusion. 2020 Mar;60(3):498-506. doi: 10.1111/trf.15675. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
4
Pre-trauma center red blood cell transfusion is associated with improved early outcomes in air medical trauma patients.创伤中心前的红细胞输血与空中医疗创伤患者早期预后的改善相关。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 May;220(5):797-808. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
5
Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma: the PROPPR randomized clinical trial.严重创伤患者血浆、血小板和红细胞以1:1:1与1:1:2比例输注及死亡率:PROPPR随机临床试验
JAMA. 2015 Feb 3;313(5):471-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12.
6
Prehospital blood transfusion in the en route management of severe combat trauma: a matched cohort study.严重战斗创伤途中救治中的院前输血:一项配对队列研究
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Sep;77(3 Suppl 2):S114-20. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000328.
7
Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) Trial: design, rationale and implementation.实用随机最佳血小板与血浆比例(PROPPR)试验:设计、原理与实施
Injury. 2014 Sep;45(9):1287-95. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
8
Pretrauma center red blood cell transfusion is associated with reduced mortality and coagulopathy in severely injured patients with blunt trauma.创伤中心输血前进行红细胞输注与钝性创伤严重受伤患者死亡率降低及凝血病相关。
Ann Surg. 2015 May;261(5):997-1005. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000674.
9
Goal-directed resuscitation in the prehospital setting: a propensity-adjusted analysis.院外目标导向性复苏:一项倾向评分调整分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 May;74(5):1207-12; discussion 1212-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31828c44fd.
10
Factors affecting hemoglobin measurement.影响血红蛋白测量的因素。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2013 Oct;27(5):499-508. doi: 10.1007/s10877-013-9456-3. Epub 2013 Mar 26.