Cardiac surgery risk scoring systems: In quest for the best.
作者信息
Hote Milind
出版信息
Heart Asia. 2018 Apr 4;10(1):e011017. doi: 10.1136/heartasia-2018-011017. eCollection 2018.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Cardiac surgery risk scoring systems: In quest for the best.心脏手术风险评分系统：探寻最佳方案。
Heart Asia. 2018 Apr 4;10(1):e011017. doi: 10.1136/heartasia-2018-011017. eCollection 2018.
2
Assessing the validity of cardiac surgery risk stratification systems for CABG patients in a single center.
Med Sci Monit. 2005 May;11(5):CR215-218. Epub 2005 Apr 28.
3
Prediction of Postoperative Outcomes and Long-Term Survival in Cardiac Surgical Patients Using the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre Score.使用重症监护国家审计与研究中心评分预测心脏外科患者的术后结局和长期生存。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Nov;33(11):3022-3027. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.05.034. Epub 2019 May 27.
4
API expert consensus document on management of ischemic heart disease.缺血性心脏病管理的API专家共识文件
J Assoc Physicians India. 2006 Jun;54:469-80.
5
Usefulness of EuroSCORE systems for risk stratification.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2015 Feb;16(2):90-9. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000065.
6
The Papworth Bleeding Risk Score: a stratification scheme for identifying cardiac surgery patients at risk of excessive early postoperative bleeding.Papworth 出血风险评分：一种用于识别心脏手术患者术后早期过度出血风险的分层方案。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Jun;39(6):924-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.10.003. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
7
An alternative scoring system to predict risk for surgical site infection complicating coronary artery bypass graft surgery.一种用于预测冠状动脉搭桥手术并发手术部位感染风险的替代评分系统。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Oct;28(10):1162-8. doi: 10.1086/519534. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
8
Validation of the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre Scoring System in a UK Adult Cardiac Surgery Population.重症监护国家审计与研究中心评分系统在英国成人心脏手术人群中的验证
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29(3):565-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.09.013. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
9
Scoring Systems for Outcome Prediction in a Cardiac Surgical Intensive Care Unit: A Comparative Study.心脏外科重症监护病房预后预测评分系统：一项比较研究
Am J Crit Care. 2015 Jul;24(4):327-34; quiz 335. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2015500.
10
Oncotic pressure and paediatric cardiopulmonary bypass: establishing baseline data for complex congenital cardiac surgery and its relation to risk stratification.胶体渗透压与小儿体外循环：建立复杂先天性心脏病手术的基线数据及其与风险分层的关系。
Perfusion. 2017 Jul;32(5):378-382. doi: 10.1177/0267659117690251. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
引用本文的文献
1
Preoperative bioelectrical impedance, measured phase angle, and hand-grip strength as predictors of postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review.术前生物电阻抗、相位角测量和握力作为心脏手术后患者术后结局的预测因素：系统评价。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):515. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04182-6.
2
Validation in Indonesia of two published scores for mortality prediction after cardiac surgery.印度尼西亚对两种已发表的心脏手术后死亡率预测评分进行验证。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2023 Jan-Mar;26(1):23-28. doi: 10.4103/aca.aca_297_20.
3
The prognostic value of elevated neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio for cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值升高对心脏手术相关急性肾损伤的预后价值：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2023 Feb;67(2):131-141. doi: 10.1111/aas.14170. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
4
Prognostic value of combined preoperative phase angle and handgrip strength in cardiac surgery.术前相位角和握力强度联合对心脏手术的预后价值。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Sep 3;17(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01970-z.
5
Machine learning to predict adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器学习预测心脏手术后不良结局：系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Card Surg. 2022 Nov;37(11):3838-3845. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16842. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
6
Machine learning methods for perioperative anesthetic management in cardiac surgery patients: a scoping review.心脏手术患者围手术期麻醉管理的机器学习方法：一项范围综述
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Dec;13(12):6976-6993. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-765.
本文引用的文献
1
East meets West: the influence of racial, ethnic and cultural risk factors on cardiac surgical risk model performance.东方与西方相遇：种族、民族和文化风险因素对心脏手术风险模型性能的影响。
Heart Asia. 2018 Feb 27;10(1):e010995. doi: 10.1136/heartasia-2017-010995. eCollection 2018.
2
Comparison of four risk scores for in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing heart valve surgery: A multicenter study in a Chinese population.心脏瓣膜手术患者院内死亡四种风险评分的比较：一项中国人群的多中心研究
Heart Lung. 2016 Sep-Oct;45(5):423-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
3
SinoSCORE: a logistically derived additive prediction model for post-coronary artery bypass grafting in-hospital mortality in a Chinese population.中国心脏手术风险评估系统（SinoSCORE）：一种基于逻辑回归分析得出的累加预测模型，用于预测中国人群冠状动脉搭桥术后住院死亡率。
Front Med. 2013 Dec;7(4):477-85. doi: 10.1007/s11684-013-0284-0. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
4
Cardiac surgery risk-stratification models.心脏手术风险分层模型。
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2012 Apr;23(3):160-4. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2011-047.
5
Risk-stratification in thoracic aortic surgery: should the EuroSCORE be modified?胸主动脉手术中的风险分层：欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统（EuroSCORE）是否应进行修改？
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 May;25(5):691-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.01.003.
6
Risk stratification in heart surgery: comparison of six score systems.心脏手术中的风险分层：六种评分系统的比较
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000 Apr;17(4):400-6. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00385-7.
7
A method of uniform stratification of risk for evaluating the results of surgery in acquired adult heart disease.一种用于评估后天性成人心脏病手术结果的风险均匀分层方法。
Circulation. 1989 Jun;79(6 Pt 2):I3-12.
Zotero 插件