文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

漱口水中和全唾液样本中的口腔微生物组比较。

Comparison of the oral microbiome in mouthwash and whole saliva samples.

机构信息

Department of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.

NYU Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Institute, New York, New York, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Apr 11;13(4):e0194729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194729. eCollection 2018.


DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0194729
PMID:29641531
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5894969/
Abstract

Population-based epidemiologic studies can provide important insight regarding the role of the microbiome in human health and disease. Buccal cells samples using commercial mouthwash have been obtained in large prospective cohorts for the purpose of studying human genomic DNA. We aimed to better understand if these mouthwash samples are also a valid resource for the study of the oral microbiome. We collected one saliva sample and one Scope mouthwash sample from 10 healthy subjects. Bacterial 16S rRNA genes from both types of samples were amplified, sequenced, and assigned to bacterial taxa. We comprehensively compared these paired samples for bacterial community composition and individual taxonomic abundance. We found that mouthwash samples yielded similar amount of bacterial DNA as saliva samples (p from Student's t-test for paired samples = 0.92). Additionally, the paired samples had similar within sample diversity (p from = 0.33 for richness, and p = 0.51 for Shannon index), and clustered as pairs for diversity when analyzed by unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis. No significant difference was found in the paired samples with respect to the taxonomic abundance of major bacterial phyla, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria, and Actinobacteria (FDR adjusted q values from Wilcoxin signed-rank test = 0.15, 0.15, 0.87, 1.00 and 0.15, respectively), and all identified genera, including genus Streptococcus (q = 0.21), Prevotella (q = 0.25), Neisseria (q = 0.37), Veillonella (q = 0.73), Fusobacterium (q = 0.19), and Porphyromonas (q = 0.60). These results show that mouthwash samples perform similarly to saliva samples for analysis of the oral microbiome. Mouthwash samples collected originally for analysis of human DNA are also a resource suitable for human microbiome research.

摘要

基于人群的流行病学研究可以为微生物组在人类健康和疾病中的作用提供重要的见解。为了研究人类基因组 DNA,已经从大型前瞻性队列中获得了使用商业漱口水的口腔细胞样本。我们旨在更好地了解这些漱口水样本是否也是研究口腔微生物组的有效资源。我们从 10 名健康受试者中收集了一个唾液样本和一个 Scope 漱口水样本。对这两种类型的样本中的细菌 16S rRNA 基因进行扩增、测序并分配到细菌分类群中。我们全面比较了这两种配对样本的细菌群落组成和个体分类丰度。我们发现,漱口水样本产生的细菌 DNA 量与唾液样本相似(配对样本学生 t 检验的 p 值=0.92)。此外,当通过非监督层次聚类分析进行分析时,配对样本的样本内多样性相似(丰富度的 p 值=0.33,Shannon 指数的 p 值=0.51),并且作为对聚类。在主要细菌门(拟杆菌门、厚壁菌门、变形菌门、梭杆菌门和放线菌门)的分类丰度方面,配对样本之间没有发现显著差异(Wilcoxon 符号秩检验的 FDR 调整 q 值分别为 0.15、0.15、0.87、1.00 和 0.15),以及所有鉴定的属,包括链球菌属(q=0.21)、普雷沃菌属(q=0.25)、奈瑟菌属(q=0.37)、韦荣球菌属(q=0.73)、梭杆菌属(q=0.19)和卟啉单胞菌属(q=0.60)。这些结果表明,漱口水样本在分析口腔微生物组方面与唾液样本表现相似。最初为分析人类 DNA 而收集的漱口水样本也是适合人类微生物组研究的资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb50/5894969/880c71be714c/pone.0194729.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb50/5894969/d896327fda50/pone.0194729.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb50/5894969/ae6cccf54d3d/pone.0194729.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb50/5894969/880c71be714c/pone.0194729.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb50/5894969/d896327fda50/pone.0194729.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb50/5894969/ae6cccf54d3d/pone.0194729.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb50/5894969/880c71be714c/pone.0194729.g003.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Comparison of the oral microbiome in mouthwash and whole saliva samples.

PLoS One. 2018-4-11

[2]
The Oral Microbiome in the Elderly With Dental Caries and Health.

Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019-1-4

[3]
Comparison of Oral Collection Methods for Studies of Microbiota.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018-9-27

[4]
Evaluation of Buccal Cell Samples for Studies of Oral Microbiota.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017-2

[5]
16S rRNA amplicon sequencing identifies microbiota associated with oral cancer, human papilloma virus infection and surgical treatment.

Oncotarget. 2016-8-9

[6]
Analysis of Transcriptionally Active Bacteria Throughout the Gastrointestinal Tract of Healthy Individuals.

Gastroenterology. 2019-6-5

[7]
The salivary microbiome for differentiating individuals: proof of principle.

Microbes Infect. 2016-4-8

[8]
Comparison of the Oral Microbiomes of Canines and Their Owners Using Next-Generation Sequencing.

PLoS One. 2015-7-2

[9]
Comparison of fecal and oral collection methods for studies of the human microbiota in two Iranian cohorts.

BMC Microbiol. 2021-11-22

[10]
The bacterial microbiota in the oral mucosa of rural Amerindians.

Microbiology (Reading). 2010-9-16

引用本文的文献

[1]
Sampling strategies for digestive system flora studies: current research and perspectives.

PeerJ. 2025-8-13

[2]
OSaMPle workflow for salivary metaproteomics analysis reveals dysbiosis in inflammatory bowel disease patients.

NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2025-4-23

[3]
Systematic analyses uncover robust salivary microbial signatures and host-microbiome perturbations in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

mSystems. 2025-2-18

[4]
Microbial and proteomic signatures of type 2 diabetes in an Arab population.

J Transl Med. 2024-12-20

[5]
Antiseptics: An expeditious third force in the prevention and management of coronavirus diseases.

Curr Res Microb Sci. 2024-10-16

[6]
Oral Microbiome: A Review of Its Impact on Oral and Systemic Health.

Microorganisms. 2024-8-29

[7]
Saliva assay: a call for methodological standardization.

J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2025-2

[8]
Altered salivary microbiota associated with high-sugar beverage consumption.

Sci Rep. 2024-6-11

[9]
Microbial Symphony: Navigating the Intricacies of the Human Oral Microbiome and Its Impact on Health.

Microorganisms. 2024-3-13

[10]
The Immune System Response to in Neurological Diseases.

Microorganisms. 2023-10-13

本文引用的文献

[1]
Association of Oral Microbiome With Risk for Incident Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer.

JAMA Oncol. 2018-3-1

[2]
Microbial Communities Associated with Primary and Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma - A High Fusobacterial and Low Streptococcal Signature.

Sci Rep. 2017-8-30

[3]
The oral microbiome and human health.

J Oral Sci. 2017

[4]
The oral microbiome - an update for oral healthcare professionals.

Br Dent J. 2016-11-18

[5]
Evaluation of Buccal Cell Samples for Studies of Oral Microbiota.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017-2

[6]
Human oral microbiome and prospective risk for pancreatic cancer: a population-based nested case-control study.

Gut. 2018-1

[7]
DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data.

Nat Methods. 2016-7

[8]
Sensitivity and correlation of hypervariable regions in 16S rRNA genes in phylogenetic analysis.

BMC Bioinformatics. 2016-3-22

[9]
Meta-analysis of the effect of an essential oil-containing mouthrinse on gingivitis and plaque.

J Am Dent Assoc. 2015-8

[10]
The Integrative Human Microbiome Project: dynamic analysis of microbiome-host omics profiles during periods of human health and disease.

Cell Host Microbe. 2014-9-10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索