Nippold Marilyn A
Communication Disorders and Sciences Program, College of Education, University of Oregon , Eugene , OR , USA.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Aug;21(4):368-376. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2018.1457721. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
: This article reviews recent studies that examined the controversial claim that children who stutter (CWS), as a group, have weaker language skills than children who do not stutter (CWNS). The article was an effort to address the conflicting conclusions of two previous reviews of the research in this area. : Studies published in research journals during the past 7 years (2011-2018) were located through a systematic review of the literature. Each study was analysed to determine how well it supported the claim that CWS, as a group, have weaker language skills than CWNS. : The evidence was not convincing to support this controversial claim. Rather, the review indicated that CWS performed as well as or better than CWNS on formal language tasks. : The claim that language weaknesses are linked to children's stuttering is not well supported by recently published studies. Alternative interpretations of the literature are offered.
本文回顾了近期的一些研究,这些研究探讨了一个有争议的观点,即口吃儿童(CWS)作为一个群体,其语言能力比非口吃儿童(CWNS)弱。本文旨在解决此前该领域两项综述得出的相互矛盾的结论。通过对文献的系统综述,找到了过去7年(2011 - 2018年)发表在研究期刊上的研究。对每项研究进行分析,以确定其在多大程度上支持CWS作为一个群体语言能力比CWNS弱这一观点。证据并不足以支持这一有争议的观点。相反,该综述表明,在正式语言任务中,CWS的表现与CWNS相当或更好。近期发表的研究并未充分支持语言缺陷与儿童口吃有关这一观点。文中还提供了对该文献的其他解释。