• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替格瑞洛与普拉格雷治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床结局比较 - 来自韩国急性心肌梗死注册登记研究 - 美国国立卫生研究院。

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Prasugrel in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction - Results From the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health.

机构信息

Heart Center of Chonnam National University Hospital.

Gachon University Gil Medical Center.

出版信息

Circ J. 2018 Jun 25;82(7):1866-1873. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0112. Epub 2018 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0112
PMID:29643279
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is little information regarding comparison of ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We sought to compare clinical outcomes between ticagrelor and prasugrel in STEMI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 1,440 patients with STEMI who underwent successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention were analyzed; the data were obtained from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health. Of the patients, 963 received ticagrelor, and 477 received prasugrel. The primary study endpoint was 12-month major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR). MACE occurred in 91 patients (6.3%) over the 1-year follow-up, and there were no differences in the incidence of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-1.91, P=0.438) between the 2 groups. Analysis by propensity score matching (429 pairs) did not significantly affect the results. The incidence of in-hospital major bleeding events was still comparable between the 2 groups (2.4% vs. 2.5%, odds ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.30-1.86, P=0.532), and there was no significant difference in the incidence of MACE (5.4% vs. 5.8%, HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.56-1.74, P=0.951) after matching.

CONCLUSIONS

Ticagrelor and prasugrel showed similar efficacy and safety profiles for treating STEMI in this Korean multicenter registry.

摘要

背景

关于替格瑞洛和普拉格雷在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中的比较,相关信息较少。我们旨在比较替格瑞洛和普拉格雷在 STEMI 患者中的临床结局。

方法和结果

共分析了 1440 例接受成功直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 STEMI 患者;这些数据来自韩国急性心肌梗死注册研究-美国国立卫生研究院。其中,963 例患者接受替格瑞洛治疗,477 例患者接受普拉格雷治疗。主要研究终点为 12 个月时的主要不良心脏事件(MACE),包括心脏死亡、心肌梗死(MI)和靶血管血运重建(TVR)。在 1 年随访期间,91 例患者(6.3%)发生 MACE,两组间 MACE 的发生率无差异(风险比 [HR] 1.20,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.76-1.91,P=0.438)。通过倾向评分匹配(429 对)分析并未显著影响结果。两组住院期间大出血事件的发生率仍相似(2.4% vs. 2.5%,比值比 0.75,95%CI 0.30-1.86,P=0.532),且匹配后 MACE 的发生率也无显著差异(5.4% vs. 5.8%,HR 0.98,95%CI 0.56-1.74,P=0.951)。

结论

在这项韩国多中心注册研究中,替格瑞洛和普拉格雷在治疗 STEMI 方面显示出相似的疗效和安全性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Prasugrel in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction - Results From the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health.替格瑞洛与普拉格雷治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床结局比较 - 来自韩国急性心肌梗死注册登记研究 - 美国国立卫生研究院。
Circ J. 2018 Jun 25;82(7):1866-1873. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0112. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
2
Real-World Data of Prasugrel vs. Ticagrelor in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results from the RENAMI Registry.真实世界研究:普拉格雷与替格瑞洛用于急性心肌梗死的疗效对比:RENA MI 注册研究结果。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2019 Aug;19(4):381-391. doi: 10.1007/s40256-019-00339-3.
3
Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.替格瑞洛或普拉格雷在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用。
Circulation. 2020 Dec 15;142(24):2329-2337. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050244. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
4
Effectiveness and safety of P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a nationwide registry-based study.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中 P2Y12 抑制剂的有效性和安全性:一项基于全国登记的研究。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2022 Sep 29;11(9):697-705. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuac095.
5
Safety and Efficacy in Prasugrel- Versus Ticagrelor-Treated Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.替格瑞洛与普拉格雷治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的安全性和疗效。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2018 Oct;72(4):186-190. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000609.
6
Optimal P2Y12 Inhibitor in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Network Meta-Analysis.行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的最佳 P2Y12 抑制剂:网状荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May 23;9(10):1036-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.02.013.
7
Physician and Hospital Utilization of P2Y12 Inhibitors in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States: A Study From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry's Research to Practice Initiative.美国ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中P2Y12抑制剂的医生及医院使用情况:一项来自国家心血管数据注册中心“研究到实践”倡议的研究
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Mar;13(3):e006275. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006275. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
8
Prehospital Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Real-World Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Referred for Primary PCI: Procedural and 30-Day Outcomes.院前普拉格雷与替格瑞洛用于接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死真实世界患者:手术及30天结局
J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Dec;30(12):431-436. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
9
Comparison of Prasugrel and Ticagrelor Antiplatelet Effects in Korean Patients Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.替格瑞洛与普拉格雷对韩国ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者抗血小板作用的比较
Circ J. 2015;79(6):1248-54. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0270. Epub 2015 May 11.
10
Outcomes Among Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, and Ticagrelor in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Who Underwent Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention From the TOTAL Trial.TOTAL 试验中接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中氯吡格雷、普拉格雷和替格瑞洛的结局。
Can J Cardiol. 2019 Oct;35(10):1377-1385. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.04.026. Epub 2019 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of Bleeding and Ischemia in Elderly East Asian Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Treated with either Clopidogrel or Ticagrelor: From the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-V.东亚老年糖尿病患者使用氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛治疗时的出血和缺血风险:来自韩国急性心肌梗死注册研究-V
Chonnam Med J. 2024 Sep;60(3):147-154. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2024.60.3.147. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
2
Ticagrelor versus Prasugrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Analysis from the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey.替格瑞洛与普拉格雷在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的比较:来自以色列急性冠状动脉综合征调查的分析。
Cardiology. 2022;147(2):113-120. doi: 10.1159/000521042. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Older Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Frequentist Network Meta-Analysis.
口服 P2Y12 抑制剂在老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的疗效和安全性:一项基于频率的网络荟萃分析。
Drugs Aging. 2021 Nov;38(11):1003-1016. doi: 10.1007/s40266-021-00896-w. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
4
Current status of acute myocardial infarction in Korea.韩国急性心肌梗死的现状。
Korean J Intern Med. 2019 Jan;34(1):1-10. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2018.381. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
5
Rationale, Design, and Baseline Characteristics of the Prospective Japan Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (JAMIR).《前瞻性日本急性心肌梗死注册研究(JAMIR)的背景、设计和基线特征》。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2019 Feb;33(1):97-103. doi: 10.1007/s10557-018-6839-1.